· Public charity
Destination Tomorrow Inc
Grassroots agency located in the south bronx that provides to and for the lgbtq community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $79,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $111,771 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $32,271 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 KINGS PROJECT | $32,500 |
| COLECTIVO EDUCAR-T Y MAS CORP | $14,500 |
| PHILADELPHIA BALLROOM ALLIANCE | $12,500 |
| BLACK ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION | $10,000 |
| NATIONAL MINORITY AIDS COUNCIL INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $700k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +101% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MMMAYFAIRE MEDICAL INC2× · 2021–2023 · $85k · revenue ×12 · 26% of their budget
- UTUNSPOKEN TREASURE SOCIETY INC3× · 2022–2024 · $60k · revenue +119%
- LCLGBT CENTER INTERCULTURAL COLLECTIVE INC3× · 2021–2024 · $48k · revenue +101%
Funded once
- GCGATEWAY COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENTone grant, 2020 · $250k
- SOSAVE OUR SISTERS UNITEDgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $38k · revenue +76% · 33% of their budget
- GCGame Changing Men Incone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
charitable to acheive inclusion and equality for black transgender women
Our mission is to ameliorate disparities faced by transgender, gender non-binary and intersex people as well as help reduce similar disparities among our lesbian, gay and bisexual communities.
To comprehensively serve as a resource for the well-being of gay men of color, inclusive but not limited to gay, bisexual & transgender & questioning communities through outreach, education & care.
The mission of translatina network is to gain equal and lasting rights for all latina transgender women at a local, state and federal level. through the effective social mobilization of our community, we will have direct involvement in…
Afro Pride fosters the mental and social wellness of the Afrocentric LGBTQ community and those who love and support them.
To educate, celebrate, promote self-empowerment and ensure that the social and cultural needs of LGBTQ+ individuals and families are met throughout the Atlanta Metropolitan area.
The National Black Trans Advocacy Coalition (BTAC) is on a mission to "Improve the Black trans human experience by overcoming violence and injustice in the world through the power, value and love of all people."
The organization works to challenge and end the human rights abuses committed against transgender, gender variant, and intersex people, particularly against Black and transgender women of color, in California prisons, jails, detention…
At Supreme Transitions, our mission is to provide unwavering support to Black survivors of domestic violence and non-intimate sexual assault, including members of the Black LGBTQ+ community. We recognize the deep-rooted impact of…
The Queer Trans Project a Black-led and Trans-led initiative is dedicated to providing gender-affirming resources to empower queer and trans individuals worldwide equipping them with the confidence and power to drive social change in their…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Capital Tea Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gateway Community Empowerment. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 7 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 26% of your grantees by number, and just 19% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 11% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MAYFAIRE MEDICAL INC ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Global Justice Corp ↗
- Who funds UNSPOKEN TREASURE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Power Safe Place Resource Center of Virginia ↗
- Who funds LGBT CENTER INTERCULTURAL COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MAHOGANY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Partnership to End AIDS Status Inc ↗
- Who funds True Self Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds TRANS WOMEN IN NEED OF SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL TEA INC ↗
- Who funds Baltimore Safe Haven Corp ↗
- Who funds SAVE OUR SISTERS UNITED ↗
- Who funds 3 KINGS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds AIDS PROJECT OF THE EAST BAY ↗
- Who funds Arts Business Collaborative ↗
- Who funds Game Changing Men Inc ↗
- Who funds Trans Women of Color Healing Project ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA HARM REDUCTION COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds Empowering Transgender Services Inc ↗
- Who funds NYTAG INC New York Transgender Advocacy Group ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE OF LOVE INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKLAND COUNTY PRIDE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CASA RUBY INC ↗
- Who funds THE ASTRAEA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEASTERN TRANSGENDER RESOURCE ↗
- Who funds BLACK TRANS FEMMES IN THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds Unique Womans Coalition ↗
- Who funds THE OKRA PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Borealis Philanthropy · Groundswell Fund · AIDS United · Tides Foundation · Proteus Fund Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · The Astraea Foundation Inc · AIDS Healthcare Foundation · Stonewall Community Foundation · Human Rights Campaign Foundation · Elton John AIDS Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Destination Tomorrow Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Baltimore Safe Haven Corp — 28% of income from government
- Miracle of Love Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Destination Tomorrow Inc?
Find your warmest path to Destination Tomorrow Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.