Skip to content

· Public charity

Destination Conshohocken

DESTINATION CONSHOHOCKEN promotes community engagement and civic participation through arts and cultural programs, charitable giving, and volunteer-driven community service.

$4k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Food & Nutrition$8kArts & Culture$8kCommunity Improvement$3kHuman Services$3kCivil Rights$2kHealth$1kCrime & Legal$884Youth Development$600Other$0
02FY2023 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
2
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLONIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL$1,000
CONSHOHOCKEN ART LEAGUE$1,000
ROTARY INTERNATIONAL - BLUE BELL ROTARY CLUB$552
BEATS FOR BELLA$550
FRITZ LODGE 308$500
NATIONAL AMBUCS INC CONSHOHOCKEN CHAPTER$250
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN$183
Individual grant recipient$120
CONSHOHOCKEN VFW POST 1074$100
COLONIAL AREA ANTI RACISM AND SOCIAL EQUITY ALLIANCE (CAARSEA)$100
THE TRICYCLE GROUP LLC$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $211) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOMEN'S CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $211 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
PA
CA
MD
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Destination Conshohocken’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 58%.

Destination Conshohockenlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 29% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19k · 11 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
26

Total granted

$19k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-19%
-15%

Still filing today

27%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $953 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
Civil RightsHealthCrime & LegalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    COLONIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL
    4× · 2020–2023 · $8k · revenue -19%
  • CA
    CONSHOHOCKEN ART LEAGUE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $5k
  • MC
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY LGBT BUSINESS ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1k

Funded once

  • MC
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • 2M
    2 MAPLE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $600
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
2
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
3
The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Inc

The multiple myeloma research foundation (mmrf) is the largest nonprofit in the world solely focused on accelerating a cure for each and every multiple myeloma patient. we drive the development and delivery of next-generation therapies,…

Health
4
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
6
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
7
The Parent Project for Muscular Dystrophy Research Inc

The parent project muscular dystrophy (ppmd) fights to end duchenne. we accelerate research, raise our voices to impact policy, demand optimal care for every single family, and strive to ensure access to approved therapies.

Human Services
8
American Brain Foundation

The american brain foundation accelerates breakthrough research across brain diseases and disorders by investing in innovative science, early-career investigators, and cross-disease discoveries that advance treatments, cures, and brain…

Health
9
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
10
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
11
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
12
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Colonial Neighborhood Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLONIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL: $8,168 · OtherCOLONIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCILCONSHOHOCKEN ART LEAGUE: $4,500 · OtherCONSHOHOCKEN ART LEAGUEMONTGOMERY COUNTY FOUNDATION INC: $2,202 · OtherMONTGOMERY COUNTY FOUNDATION INCMONTGOMERY COUNTY LGBT BUSINESS ASSOCIATION: $1,050 · OtherFRITZ LODGE 308: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherNATIONAL AMBUCS INC CONSHOHOCKEN CHAPTER: $954 · OtherCONSHOHOCKEN VFW POST 1074: $900 · Other+22 more: $6,154 · Other+22 moreMINDING YOUR MIND: $500 · HealthNATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC: $250 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $105 · HealthHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $183 · Civil RightsWE THE PROTESTERS INC: $150 · Civil RightsTHE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC: $50 · Civil RightsWOMEN'S CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $211 · Human ServicesPHILADELPHIA BAIL FUND INC: $150 · Crime & LegalMINNESOTA FREEDOM FUND: $50 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $124 · PhilanthropyHOW CHARITIES: $47 · Philanthropy
Other$25,928Health$855Civil Rights$383Human Services$211Crime & Legal$200Philanthropy$171

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLONIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL: $8,168 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL AMBUCS INC CONSHOHOCKEN CHAPTER: $954 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetMINDING YOUR MIND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS SERVICES INC: $276 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $211 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $183 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWE THE PROTESTERS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA BAIL FUND INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $124 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA FREEDOM FUND: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOW CHARITIES: $47 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLONIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AMBUCS INC CONSHOHOCKEN CHAPTER ↗
  • Who funds MINDING YOUR MIND ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds WE THE PROTESTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA BAIL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA FREEDOM FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOW CHARITIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Destination Conshohocken funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Destination Conshohocken. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Destination Conshohocken?

    Find your warmest path to Destination Conshohocken through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $3k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Destination Conshohocken’s filings →

    More from the funding graph