Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Destination Conshohocken

DESTINATION CONSHOHOCKEN promotes community engagement and civic participation through arts and cultural programs, charitable giving, and volunteer-driven community service.

$4k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Food & Nutrition$8kArts & Culture$8kCommunity Improvement$3kHuman Services$3kCivil Rights$2kHealth$1kCrime & Legal$884Youth Development$600Other$0
02FY2023 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$250
Median grant
2
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONSHOHOCKEN ART LEAGUE$1,000
COLONIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL$1,000
ROTARY INTERNATIONAL - BLUE BELL ROTARY CLUB$552
BEATS FOR BELLA$550
FRITZ LODGE 308$500
NATIONAL AMBUCS INC CONSHOHOCKEN CHAPTER$250
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN$183
Individual grant recipient$120
CONSHOHOCKEN VFW POST 1074$100
COLONIAL AREA ANTI RACISM AND SOCIAL EQUITY ALLIANCE (CAARSEA)$100
THE TRICYCLE GROUP LLC$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $211) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOMEN'S CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $211 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
NY
PA
CA
MD
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of Destination Conshohocken’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 58% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Destination Conshohockenlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 29% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19k · 11 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
26

Total granted

$19k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-19%
-15%

Still filing today

27%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $953 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
Civil RightsHealthCrime & LegalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    COLONIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL
    4× · 2020–2023 · $8k · revenue -19%
  • CA
    CONSHOHOCKEN ART LEAGUE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $5k
  • MC
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY LGBT BUSINESS ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1k

Funded once

  • MC
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • 2M
    2 MAPLE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $600

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
2
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
3
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
4
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
5
The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Inc

The multiple myeloma research foundation (mmrf) is the largest nonprofit in the world solely focused on accelerating acurefor multiple myeloma patient. we drive the development and delivery of next-generation therapies, leverage data to…

Health
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

7
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
8
2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal

The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…

Health
9
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
10
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
11
Communication First

To protect the rights and advance the interests of the estimated 5 million children and adults in the united states who cannot rely on speech alone to be heard and understood, through public education, systemic reform of policy and…

Education
12
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Colonial Neighborhood Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COLONIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL — $8,168 · OtherCOLONIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCILCONSHOHOCKEN ART LEAGUE — $4,500 · OtherCONSHOHOCKEN ART LEAGUEMONTGOMERY COUNTY FOUNDATION INC — $2,202 · OtherMONTGOMERY COUNTY FOUNDATION INCMONTGOMERY COUNTY LGBT BUSINESS ASSOCIATION — $1,050 · OtherFRITZ LODGE 308 — $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $1,000 · OtherNATIONAL AMBUCS INC CONSHOHOCKEN CHAPTER — $954 · OtherCONSHOHOCKEN VFW POST 1074 — $900 · Other+22 more — $6,154 · Other+22 moreMINDING YOUR MIND — $500 · HealthNATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC — $250 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC — $105 · HealthHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC — $183 · Civil RightsWE THE PROTESTERS INC — $150 · Civil RightsTHE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC — $50 · Civil RightsWOMEN'S CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY — $211 · Human ServicesPHILADELPHIA BAIL FUND INC — $150 · Crime & LegalMINNESOTA FREEDOM FUND — $50 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND — $124 · PhilanthropyHOW CHARITIES — $47 · Philanthropy
Other$25,928Health$855Civil Rights$383Human Services$211Crime & Legal$200Philanthropy$171

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLONIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL — $8,168 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL AMBUCS INC CONSHOHOCKEN CHAPTER — $954 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetMINDING YOUR MIND — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS SERVICES INC — $276 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY — $211 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC — $183 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWE THE PROTESTERS INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA BAIL FUND INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND — $124 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC — $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA FREEDOM FUND — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOW CHARITIES — $47 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLONIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL
  • Who funds NATIONAL AMBUCS INC CONSHOHOCKEN CHAPTER
  • Who funds MINDING YOUR MIND
  • Who funds ACCESS SERVICES INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC
  • Who funds WE THE PROTESTERS INC
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA BAIL FUND INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC
  • Who funds MINNESOTA FREEDOM FUND
  • Who funds THE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HOW CHARITIES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Destination Conshohocken funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Destination Conshohocken?

    Find your warmest path to Destination Conshohocken through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $6k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph