Loading…
· Public charity
DESTINATION CONSHOHOCKEN
DESTINATION CONSHOHOCKEN promotes community engagement and civic participation through arts and cultural programs, charitable giving, and volunteer-driven community service.
$4k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants
2
Communities
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 94% of DESTINATION CONSHOHOCKEN’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
festival carcar showshow musicianrequested feefee paidmusician emilyemily drinker
2021
suicideafter hurricanehurricane idaida damageproceedsbikerebuild after
2022
montgomerypartner
2023
lgbtqmontgomerypartner
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 11 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$250
Median grant
2
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
- COLONIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL$1,000
- CONSHOHOCKEN ART LEAGUE$1,000
- ROTARY INTERNATIONAL - BLUE BELL ROTARY CLUB$552
- BEATS FOR BELLA$550
- FRITZ LODGE 308$500
- NATIONAL AMBUCS INC CONSHOHOCKEN CHAPTER$250
- HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN$183
- WARRIOR ELITE CHEER$120
- CONSHOHOCKEN VFW POST 1074$100
- THE TRICYCLE GROUP LLC$100
- COLONIAL AREA ANTI RACISM AND SOCIAL EQUITY ALLIANCE (CAARSEA)$100
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $211) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
05
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 16% of DESTINATION CONSHOHOCKEN’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 58% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
DESTINATION CONSHOHOCKENlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 29% directed abroad (not shown)Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19k · 11 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else
11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
11
26
Total granted
$19k
$8k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
-20%
+64%
Still filing today
27%
31%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $953 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Crime & LegalCivil RightsHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CNCOLONIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL4× · 2020–2023 · $8k · revenue -20%
- CACONSHOHOCKEN ART LEAGUE3× · 2021–2023 · $5k
- MCMONTGOMERY COUNTY LGBT BUSINESS ASSOCIATION3× · 2020–2022 · $1k
Funded once
- MCMONTGOMERY COUNTY FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $2k
- RPRICKY'S PRIDE PACone grant, 2022 · $1k
- 2M2 MAPLE INCone grant, 2021 · $600
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
National Coalition for Cancer
Advocates for changes in how the nation researches,regulates,finances & delivers quality cancer care.
Health
2
Patient Access Network Foundation
As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…
—
3
Maryland Coalition of Families Inc
The maryland coalition of families, inc. (the coalition) is the statewide voice for families who care for someone with behavioral health needs, and is dedicated to building a family-driven network of information and support, and improving…
Health
4
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank
Fighting hunger, improving lives, strengthening communities.
Food & Nutrition
5
Montco Anti-Hunger Network
Montco anti-hunger network works to end hunger, through innovation, emergency food provider support, best practices, policy advocacy and providing food resources.
Food & Nutrition
6
Human Rights Campaign Foundation
Research, advocacy and education to support and protect lgbtq+ individuals and families.
Civil Rights
7
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of
Easing the hardship of children's illness on families through programs that directly improve the health and wellbeing of children.
Health
8
Service Coordination Unlimited Inc
To coordinate services to empower people in their pursuit of independence and interdependence
Health
9
National Domestic Violence Hotline
The national domestic violence hotline provides 24/7 services to those affected by domestic violence including crisis prevention, personalized safety planning, and connection to resources, information, and referrals.
Human Services
10
Montgomery County Food Bank
The mission of Montgomery County Food Bank is uniting the community to fight hunger.
—
11
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc
The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.
Health
12
American Civil Liberties Union -
Provide assistance to those denied their civil liberties
Civil Rights
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Children's Cancer Research Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
06the grantee network
12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$26,183Health$750Civil Rights$233Human Services$211Crime & Legal$200Philanthropy$171
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COLONIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL AMBUCS INC CONSHOHOCKEN CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds MINDING YOUR MIND ↗
- Who funds ACCESS SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA BAIL FUND ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA FREEDOM FUND ↗
- Who funds THE LOVELAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOW CHARITIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Philadelphia FoundationPA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Network for Good · Verizon Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation DESTINATION CONSHOHOCKEN funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NATIONAL AMBUCS INC CONSHOHOCKEN CHAPTER.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 911904332 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on NATIONAL AMBUCS INC CONSHOHOCKEN CHAPTER, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Destination Conshohocken?
Find your warmest path to Destination Conshohocken through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines