· Public charity
Desk Drawer Fund
Our mission is to partner with donors to empower transformational change to make a sustainable difference in our communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 17 grants below total $648,192 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $688,194 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $40,002 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k12 grants · $238k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $410k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LIGHTHOUSE MI | $100,000 |
| TRAVERSE CITY PHILHARMONIC | $100,000 |
| CHILD AND FAMILY CHARITIES | $100,000 |
| WOMEN'S CENTER OF GREATER LANSING | $60,199 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS CAPITAL REGION | $50,000 |
| AFFIRMATIONS | $40,133 |
| IMPRESSION 5 | $25,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CAPITAL REGION | $25,000 |
| MICHAEL'S PLACE | $20,066 |
| SALUTE INC | $20,066 |
| UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN | $20,066 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF WEST MICHIGAN | $20,066 |
| NEW MOM'S INC | $20,066 |
| WOLDUMAR NATURE CENTER | $17,530 |
| HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $703k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $198k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CAChild and Family Charities6× · 2019–2025 · $432k · revenue +169%
- I5IMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER5× · 2020–2025 · $155k · revenue +55%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CAPITAL REGION INC3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- TOTRI-COUNTY OFFICE ON AGINGone grant, 2024 · $61k
- WRWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER GRAND TRAVERSE AREAone grant, 2023 · $48k · revenue +11%
- ANAllen Neighborhood Centergraduatedone grant, 2023 · $47k · revenue +55%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.
Inspire awareness, appreciation and passion for michigan's history and stories, culture and environment through the arts.
To achieve full equality and respect for all michigan residents, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.
To advance the safety, independence, and economic stability of those most affected by poverty, racism, and other structurally oppressive systems by increasing access to justice and working for systemic solutions.
Providing pathways to success for detroiters in need.
To offer education, assistance and resources to women and families in the greater lansing area.
Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.
The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.
To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.
Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Affirmations Community Center and the most unlike its peers is Grit Glam and Guts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Child and Family Charities ↗
- Who funds TRAVERSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA D/B/A TRAVERSE CITY PHILHARMONIC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH OAKLAND SHELTER ↗
- Who funds Capital Area United Way Inc ↗
- Who funds IMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CAPITAL REGION INC ↗
- Who funds Lansing Promise ↗
- Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE MICHIGAN WOMEN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MICHIGAN CAPITAL REGION INC ↗
- Who funds LANSING ART GALLERY & EDUCATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds Women's Center of Greater Lansing ↗
- Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF GREATER LANSING ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER GRAND TRAVERSE AREA ↗
- Who funds Allen Neighborhood Center ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds EVE - End Violent Encounters ↗
- Who funds AFFIRMATIONS COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS ↗
- Who funds BARN SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds THE DAVIES PROJECT FOR MID MICHIGAN CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds THE NEW DAY FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds Firecracker Foundation ↗
- Who funds HELPING WOMEN PERIOD INC ↗
- Who funds AYA YOUTH COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds Reach Studio Art Center ↗
- Who funds LOVE IN DEED INC ↗
- Who funds SALUS CENTER ↗
- Who funds YOUTH HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA HOUSING PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds ALL OF THE ABOVE HIP HOP ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds HOPE AGAINST TRAFFICKING ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION OF WEST MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC THEATRE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Capital Region Community Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Lansing Economic Area Partnership · Dte Energy Foundation · Lansing Rotary Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Comerica Charitable Foundation · Joe D Pentecost Foundation · Louis Berkowitz Family Foundation Inc · Dart Foundation fka Solid Waste Management Foundation · Re Olds Foundation · Greater Lansing Destination Development Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Desk Drawer Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Desk Drawer Fund?
Find your warmest path to Desk Drawer Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.