Skip to content

· Private foundation

Des Plaines Publishing Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$110k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$403kHuman Services$54kInternational$28kEducation$25kYouth Development$17kPhilanthropy$17kHousing & Shelter$10kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Center Pointe Church$5,000
Hope Fellowship$5,000
Vision Church$5,000
Asssemblies of God World Missions$5,000
Gospel for India$5,000
Grace Covenant Church$5,000
Church At The Well$5,000
Ascent College$5,000
Openhouse Church CLG$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
New York Ministry Network$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Ascent College - Missions$4,000
One at the Well$4,000
River of Life$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Now I Am Known Foundation: $5k → 10%A Fearless Life: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
IA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Des Plaines Publishing Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 51% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 44%.

Des Plaines Publishing Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$279k · 27 repeat orgs$350k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
91

Total granted

$279k
$279k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+2%

Still filing today

26%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationInternationalHuman ServicesCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    Ascent College
    6× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +289%
  • AI
    Arrabon Inc
    4× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +862%
  • LH
    Lydia House International
    5× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • A
    AGUSM
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • NE
    Needle's Eye Ministry
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • WO
    Word of Life Assembly
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Explore God Network
—
2
Safe Haven Counseling Associates in

Biblical counseling

—
3
Be Reconciled

We exist to provide educational and training resources for believers to love biblical unity live out reconciliation and lead reconciliation conversations

Religion
4
Dove On the Rise International

Expansion of the Gospel of Christ through training literature and digital teaching materials.

—
5
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
6
The Life Connection Inc
Religion
7
Encounter Church

Church

Religion
8
Relevant Resources

To spread the gospel through public speaking platforms and engagements

Religion
9
Elevateher International Ministries

mission is to empower women to heal from trauma, grow in faith, and thrive in purpose, fully realizing their full potential

—
10
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
11
Unify Ministries
Religion
12
Kingdom Conversations

To promote Christian ministry through campus outreach, student discipleship, missions support, and gospel conversations

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Unknown Nations; the most unlike its peers is Now I am Known Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 137 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD: $30,000 · OtherTHE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GODGIVE 1125 INC: $23,474 · OtherWord of Life AG: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $18,223 · Other+114 more: $390,350 · Other+114 moreAscent College: $49,500 · ReligionAscent CollegeArrabon Inc: $12,915 · ReligionArrabon IncShe Rises Inc: $5,000 · ReligionShe Rises IncBURNING HOPE MINISTRIES: $5,000 · ReligionBURNING HOPE MIN…ASIAN AMERICAN CHRISTIAN COLLABORATIVE: $5,000 · ReligionASIAN AMERICAN C…REVFRESH INC: $5,000 · ReligionREVFRESH INCJude 3 Project Inc: $5,000 · ReligionJude 3 Project I…+1 more: $3,000 · ReligionLydia House International: $11,000 · InternationalUNKNOWN NATIONS: $9,000 · InternationalRISE PROGRAM INC (RE-ENTRY INVESTMENT/STUDENT ED): $6,000 · EducationToccoa Falls College Inc: $2,500 · EducationMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationSOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC: $1,000 · EducationA FEARLESS LIFE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesNow I am Known Foundation: $5,000 · Human ServicesSaveOne: $5,000 · Crime & LegalTEEN CHALLENGE OF BALTIMORE INC: $5,000 · HealthMISSION RECONCILE: $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$482,047Religion$90,415International$20,000Education$11,500Human Services$10,000Crime & Legal$5,000Health$5,000Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAscent College: $49,500 over 6y, 8.9% of budgetArrabon Inc: $12,915 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetLydia House International: $11,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetUNKNOWN NATIONS: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRISE PROGRAM INC (RE-ENTRY INVESTMENT/STUDENT ED): $6,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetA FEARLESS LIFE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetSaveOne: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNow I am Known Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetBURNING HOPE MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTEEN CHALLENGE OF BALTIMORE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetNEEDLE'S EYE MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN CHRISTIAN COLLABORATIVE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMISSION RECONCILE: $5,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetREVFRESH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetJude 3 Project Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetToccoa Falls College Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEEN CHALLENGE OF FLORIDA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVINE ASSOCIATES: $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ascent College ↗
  • Who funds Arrabon Inc ↗
  • Who funds Lydia House International ↗
  • Who funds UNKNOWN NATIONS ↗
  • Who funds RISE PROGRAM INC (RE-ENTRY INVESTMENT/STUDENT ED) ↗
  • Who funds A FEARLESS LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds She Rises Inc ↗
  • Who funds SaveOne ↗
  • Who funds Now I am Known Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BURNING HOPE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEEDLE'S EYE MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS10.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Des Plaines Publishing Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Des Plaines Publishing Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Des Plaines Publishing Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Des Plaines Publishing Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 137 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Des Plaines Publishing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph