Skip to content

· Private foundation

Derek Wang Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$31kEnvironment$30kHealth$23kReligion$13kScience & Tech$8kPhilanthropy$6kEducation$4kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$349k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Friends of Children with Special Ne$5,500
Monterey Bay Aquarium$2,500
James Smithson Society$2,500
River of Life Christian Church$1,500
National Geographic Society$1,000
Camp Via West$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Grand Canyon Associate: $1k → 16%LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%Stop AAPI Hate: $1k → 10%Monterey Bay Aquarium: $3k → 12%St Jude Children's Research Hospita: $1k → 17%Art Institute of Chicago: $1k → 14%Grand Canyon Conservancy: $1k → 16%Lucile Packard Foundation: $1k → 8%Friends of Children with Special Ne: $6k → 10%BRIGHT FUNDS: $2k → 10%Monterey Bay Aquarium: $3k → 12%Vatican Museums Patrons of Arts: $2k → 17%Art Institute of Chicago: $1k → 14%Alzheimer Disease Research: $1k → 8%Grand Canyon Associate: $1k → 16%Friends of Children with Special Ne: $4k → 10%BRIGHT FUNDS: $1k → 10%Monterey Bay Aquarium: $3k → 12%Art Institute of Chicago: $1k → 14%Grand Canyon Conservancy: $1k → 16%Friends of Children with Special Ne: $2k → 10%Monterey Bay Aquarium: $3k → 12%Vatican Museums Patrons of Arts: $1k → 17%Art Institute of Chicago: $1k → 14%Grand Canyon Associate: $1k → 16%Monterey Bay Aquarium: $3k → 12%GRAND CANYON ASSOCIATE: $1k → 16%MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM: $3k → 12%MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM: $3k → 12%Monterey Bay Aquarium: $3k → 12%United Nations Foundation: $1k → 17%RIVER OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $3k → 8%River of Life Christian Church: $3k → 8%ROLCC River of Live Christian Churc: $3k → 8%RIVER OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $2k → 8%NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $1k → 14%River of Life Christian Church: $2k → 8%National Geographic Society: $2k → 14%River of Life Christian Church: $2k → 8%National Geographic Society: $1k → 14%River of Life Christian Church: $2k → 8%National Geographic Society: $1k → 14%ROLCC River of Live Christian Churc: $1k → 8%National Geographic Society: $1k → 14%FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 8%National Geographic Society: $1k → 14%National Geographic Society: $1k → 14%CUPERTINO MIDDLE SCHOOL: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CA
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$110k · 25 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
31

Total granted

$110k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+19%

Still filing today

52%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsEnvironmentInternationalRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +105%
  • FO
    Friends of Children with Special Needs
    4× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +37%
  • NG
    NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY
    6× · 2019–2025 · $7k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • SL
    Stanford Lucile Packard Children Ho
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • SS
    SHIN SHIN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
4
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
5
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
6
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
7
International Snow Leopard Trust

The international snow leopard trust aims to ethically conserve snow leopards and their high mountain ecosystems through partnerships with indigenous peoples and local communities, and through research to improve the understanding of snow…

Animals
8
Sweet Farm Foundation

Sweet farm is the world's first nonprofit sanctuary to address the devastating impact that factory farming has on climate change from the perspective of animals, plants, and the planet. we must first understand how these pieces are…

Animals
9
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
10
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
11
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
12
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California State Parks Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Shin Shin Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JAMES SMITHSON SOCIETY: $17,500 · OtherJAMES SMITHSON SOCIETYRIVER OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $12,620 · OtherRIVER OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCHSMITHSONIAN: $4,750 · OtherSMITHSONIANROLCC River of Live Christian Churc: $3,900 · OtherROLCC River of Live Christian ChurcBRIGHT FUNDS: $3,491 · OtherBRIGHT FUNDSVatican Museums Patrons of Arts: $3,480 · OtherVatican Museums Patrons of Arts+32 more: $14,349 · Other+32 moreMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $20,550 · AnimalsMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM…PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $1,000 · Animals+3 more: $1,300 · Animals+3 moreFriends of Children with Special Needs: $11,780 · HealthFriends of Chil…LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $2,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD …VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF): $1,500 · HealthVALLEY HEALTH F…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,241 · HealthST JUDE CHILDRE…+2 more: $250 · HealthNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $6,500 · EducationNATIONAL …THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $4,117 · EducationTHE ART I…GRAND CANYON CONSERVANCY: $6,500 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $960 · Environment+1 more: $100 · EnvironmentSHIN SHIN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · InternationalUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 · InternationalGOFUNDMEORG: $1,515 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$60,090Animals$22,850Health$16,771Education$10,617Environment$7,560International$2,500Philanthropy$2,015

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $20,550 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Children with Special Needs: $11,780 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND CANYON CONSERVANCY: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $4,117 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $1,515 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF): $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,241 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHIN SHIN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $960 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMITHIL PRASAD FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPoint Lobos Foundation: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA CLARA CHORALE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIA REHABILITATION SERVICES INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Children with Special Needs ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GRAND CANYON CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF) ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHIN SHIN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds SPCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA13.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Derek Wang Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Derek Wang Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Derek Wang Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Derek Wang Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Derek Wang Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph