· Private foundation
Dennis & Jennie Hendrix Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IU WOMEN'S PHILANTHROPY LEADERSHIP COUNCIL | $5,000 |
| GRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| GREENVILLE LEARNING CENTER INC | $3,500 |
| THE SHELTON SCHOOL | $2,000 |
| ROARING FORK CONSERVANCY | $2,000 |
| GREAT HEARTS MONTE VISTA | $1,500 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES BLOOMINGTON INC | $1,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BLOOMINGTON AND MONROE COUNTY | $1,000 |
| BLOOMINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC | $1,000 |
| NEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE | $1,000 |
| PARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GLGREENVILLE LEARNING CENTER8× · 2017–2025 · $49k · revenue +64%
Indiana University Foundation7× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +97%- GHGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +149%
Funded once
- ARAMERICAN RED CROSS GREATER HOUSTON CHAPTERone grant, 2017 · $10k
- SASALVATION ARMYone grant, 2018 · $2k
- CFCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BLOOMINGTONone grant, 2020 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Foundation is organized to raise and preserve funds to be used to promote and extend the programming of the Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Carolina.
To identify qualified applicants in order to provide scholarship grants for advanced career educational opportunities that may otherwise go unfulfilled.
Mission and significant activities to promote exclusively the social welfare of boys and girls in indiana; to provide guidance and to promote the health, social, educational, vocational, character, and cultural development of boys and…
The Bowling Green Community Foundation, a nonprofit entity, exists to improve the quality of life in the Bowling Green area by providing funding and support for programs that will enhance the health, welfare, and vitality of the Bowling…
Since 1930, the boys & girls club of dayton (bgcd) has been an anchor and oasis with a mission focused on inspiring, developing and helping young people to reach their full potential because we believe that every child has the potential to…
Bgci believes that every young person deserves to live a life filled with hope and opportunity. because we care about our young people, we provide a safe, educational, and positive atmosphere where they can prosper and reach their full…
To foster the courage and strength in children and families to meet life's challenges and build fulfilling lives serving new haven, hartford and tolland counties.
At buxton, we meet each student where they are. we shape an education together, in an environment where the principles of progressive education can be lived every day. here, experiences outside the classroom are as important as those…
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Match mentoring volunteers with children in need to build and foster relationships.
Aid in funding the programs of the Boys & Girls Club of Wichita Falls. Contributions are made throughout the year to the Boys & Girls Club of Wichita Falls to help defray the cost of operating the clubs and to help fund the activities for…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Bloomington and Monroe County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Trini Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREENVILLE LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
- Who funds GRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ROARING FORK CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Third Street Education Center Inc ↗
- Who funds BLOOMINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRINI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BLOOMINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BLOOMINGTON AND MONROE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities Bloomington Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN ↗
- Who funds THE MAGDALEN HOUSE ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA ↗
- Who funds Building Hope Community Life Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Hope of Glory Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds PARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE ↗
- Who funds Constellation Stage & Screen Inc ↗
- Who funds WESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Eddie and Jo Allison Smith Family Foundation Inc · Tr Uw Vivian S West - West Memorial Fund · Mildred Sheffield Wells Char Trust · James J & Mamie Richardson Perkins Memorial Fund - C/O Bank of America · University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation Inc · The Smithville Charitable Foundation Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Duke Energy Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dennis & Jennie Hendrix Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.