Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dennis and Deborah Getter Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$137k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$205kHuman Services$195kYouth Development$145kFood & Nutrition$75kHousing & Shelter$55kArts & Culture$54kReligion$51kPublic Benefit$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COVENANT DAY SCHOOL$40,000
YOUNG LIFE$10,000
FOLDS OF HONOR$10,000
THE COMMUNITY CAFE INC$10,000
DEFEND THE FATHERLESS$10,000
WORTHY BOYS AND GIRLS CAMP$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
THE BALLANTYNE BALL$6,500
MATTHEWS ATHLETIC & RECREATION ASSOCIATION$5,500
FORT MILL CARE CENTER INC$5,000
CHILDREN'S ATTENTION HOME$5,000
NATION FORD HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF YORK COUNTY$5,000
COMPETITIVE CHAMPIONS OF THE CAROLINAS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $230k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS: $15k → 7%MISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS: $10k → 7%MISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS: $10k → 7%MISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS: $10k → 7%PATHWAYS COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 8%MISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS: $10k → 7%MISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS: $10k → 7%MISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS: $10k → 7%DEFEND THE FATHERLESS: $10k → 8%DEFEND THE FATHERLESS: $10k → 8%DEFEND THE FATHERLESS: $10k → 8%FORT MILL CARE CENTER INC: $5k → 8%FORT MILL CARE CENTER INC: $5k → 8%FORT MILL CARE CENTER INC: $5k → 8%FORT MILL CARE CENTER INC: $5k → 8%FORT MILL CARE CENTER INC: $5k → 8%FORT MILL CARE CENTER INC: $5k → 8%FORT MILL CARE CENTER INC: $5k → 8%FORT MILL CARE CENTER INC: $5k → 8%THE COMMUNITY CAFE: $15k → 8%THE COMMUNITY CAFE INC: $10k → 8%THE COMMUNITY CAFE: $10k → 8%THE COMMUNITY CAFE INC: $10k → 8%THE COMMUNITY CAFE: $10k → 8%THE COMMUNITY CAFE INC: $10k → 8%THE COMMUNITY CAFE INC: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$834k · 21 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
5

Total granted

$834k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+106%

Still filing today

48%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity of York County Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $55k · revenue +227%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $55k · revenue +62%
  • TP
    THE PALMETTO SCHOOL
    5× · 2017–2021 · $40k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • CA
    CULTURE AND HERITAGE MUSEUM OF NEW YORK COUNTY
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
  • PC
    PATHWAYS COMMUNITY CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +106%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Childrens Home

The mission of Carolina Children's Home is to meet the under-served mental and physical health needs of children, young adults, and their families

Human Services
2
Carolina Adoption Services Inc

Carolina adoption services provides international and domestic adoption services, foster care, home studies, and post adoption support for children, youth and adoptive families.

Human Services
3
Carolina Family Connections

Recruit and train and license foster parents to receive foster children from county government agencies.

Human Services
4
Carolina Community Care Inc

The mission of hospice & community care is to give hope, comfort, and compassion to those that need it most. hospice & community care is a nonprofit healthcare organization providing hospice and palliative care to residents of york,…

—
5
York County Board of Disabilities and Special Needs

Serve clients with intellectual and developmental disabilities within york county, south carolina.

—
6
South Carolina Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse

Youth Development
7
Waccamaw Youth Center Inc

The waccamaw youth center is committed to providing the at-risk youth of south carolina with a safe and comforting place to call home.

—
8
Childcare Matters Inc

To provide quality childcare for the chapel hill nc community.

Human Services
9
Carolina Youth Soccer Association

To provide all families a positive, healthy, progressive environment for youth development through soccer in our community.

Youth Development
10
Ymca of Coastal Carolina

To put chirstian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

Human Services
11
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

Human Services
12
Church of God Children's Home of North Carolina Inc

To provide a positive and safe living environment for hurting, abused, neglected and at-risk children placed privately and by the north carolina department of social services

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Attention Home Inc; the most unlike its peers is Competitive Champions of the Carolinas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COVENANT DAY SCHOOL INC: $130,000 · OtherCOVENANT DAY SCHOOL INCWORTHY BOYS AND GIRLS CAMP: $90,000 · OtherWORTHY BOYS AND GIRLS CAMPHabitat for Humanity of York County Inc: $55,000 · OtherHabitat for Humanity of York County IncFOLDS OF HONOR: $40,000 · OtherFOLDS OF HONORCHILDREN'S ATTENTION HOME INC: $40,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S ATTENTION HOME INCSOUTH CAROLINA POLICY COUNCIL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherSOUTH CAROLINA POLICY COUNCIL EDUCATION FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherNATION FORD HIGH SCHOOL: $20,000 · Other+12 more: $108,800 · Other+12 moreMISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesMISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS IN…THE COMMUNITY CAFE INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY CAFE INCFort Mill Care Center Inc: $40,000 · Human ServicesFort Mill Care Center IncDEFEND THE FATHERLESS INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesDEFEND THE FATHERLESS INCPATHWAYS COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG LIFE: $55,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PALMETTO SCHOOL: $40,000 · EducationBallantyne Ball: $26,500 · Arts & CultureCOMPETITIVE CHAMPIONS OF THE CAROLINAS: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$533,800Human Services$230,000Youth Development$55,000Education$40,000Arts & Culture$26,500Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS INC: $75,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY CAFE INC: $75,000 over 7y, 15% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of York County Inc: $55,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PALMETTO SCHOOL: $40,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetFort Mill Care Center Inc: $40,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S ATTENTION HOME INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDEFEND THE FATHERLESS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA POLICY COUNCIL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetBallantyne Ball: $26,500 over 5y, 57% of budgetPATHWAYS COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMATTHEWS ATHLETIC AND RECREATION ASSOCIATION: $5,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMPETITIVE CHAMPIONS OF THE CAROLINAS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY CAFE INC ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of York County Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds THE PALMETTO SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Fort Mill Care Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ATTENTION HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds DEFEND THE FATHERLESS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA POLICY COUNCIL EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Ballantyne Ball ↗
  • Who funds PATHWAYS COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MATTHEWS ATHLETIC AND RECREATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COMPETITIVE CHAMPIONS OF THE CAROLINAS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC22.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · The Springs Close Foundation Inc · The Junior Welfare League Inc · United Way of York County SC · York Electric Trust Inc · Community Partnership Foundation · Comporium Foundation Inc · South Carolina Christian Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way Worldwide · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dennis and Deborah Getter Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dennis and Deborah Getter Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dennis and Deborah Getter’s filings →

    More from the funding graph