Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Denise and Michael Kellen Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$23MArts & Culture$7.4MAnimals$5.1MHealth$4.5MPhilanthropy$815kReligion$222kCommunity Improvement$100kEmployment$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $618k
  • $250k+4 grants · $17M
$127,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$625M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WELLESLEY COLLEGE$10,100,000
THE JOAN AND SANFORD I WEILL$5,000,000
ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER$1,250,000
ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY$1,000,000
SILVER HILL HOSPITAL$200,000
ACT OF CONNECTICUT$140,765
CHAPEL & YORK FOUNDATION$127,500
HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY$100,000
CHABAD OF ICELAND INC$50,000
RIDGEFIELD LIBRARY ASSOCIATION$10,000
RIDGEFIELD CONSERVATORY OF DANCE$10,000
THE NEW YORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY$7,500
GLEN ROCK BOOSTER CLUB$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
KY
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$34M · 14 repeat orgs$7.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
22

Total granted

$34M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+12%

Still filing today

71%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthAnimalsCommunity ImprovementReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    Wellesley College
    7× · 2017–2024 · $20M · revenue +63%
  • VB
    Vassar Brothers Medical Center
    2× · 2020–2022 · $1.5M · revenue +34%
  • AO
    ACT OF CONNECTICUT
    6× · 2018–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +587%

Funded once

  • PM
    PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART
    one grant, 2019 · $500k · revenue -15%
  • CI
    COHME INC
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $150k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
3
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
10
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
11
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hunter College Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Korean-American Medical Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Government Accountability R…Professional Ballet Compani…Jewish Community FederationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionLand Conservation Organizat…Public Library SupportWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Developmental Disabilities …Asian American Advocacy & H…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Arts OrganizationsIndependent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%2%20–35yr13%2%35–55yr16%86%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,534

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
18/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Wellesley College — $19,607,000 · EducationWellesley CollegeTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $3,050,000 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY+6 more — $810,500 · EducationTHE JOAN AND SANFORD I WEILL — $5,000,000 · OtherTHE JOAN AND SANFORD…Weill Medical College of Cornell Univers — $1,100,000 · OtherWeill Medical Colleg…+16 more — $1,419,000 · Other+16 moreTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER — $5,000,000 · AnimalsTHE ANIMAL ME…+2 more — $55,000 · AnimalsVassar Brothers Medical Center — $1,500,000 · HealthMELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $1,025,000 · HealthSILVER HILL HOSPITAL INC — $400,000 · Health+1 more — $100,000 · HealthACT OF CONNECTICUT — $1,290,765 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $500,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC — $125,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $67,500 · Arts & CultureCHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC — $714,500 · PhilanthropyINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $100,000 · Community Improvement
Education$23,467,500Other$7,519,000Animals$5,055,000Health$3,025,000Arts & Culture$1,983,265Philanthropy$714,500Community Improvement$200,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWellesley College — $19,607,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER — $5,000,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $3,050,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetVassar Brothers Medical Center — $1,500,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACT OF CONNECTICUT — $1,290,765 over 6y, 17% of budgetMELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $1,025,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetCHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC — $714,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $500,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRIDGEFIELD ACADEMY INC — $500,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSILVER HILL HOSPITAL INC — $400,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MANHATTAN CHILDRENS CENTER — $150,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNEWYORKREP INC — $145,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC — $125,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEAGLE HILL FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD — $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIDGEFIELD CONSERVATORY OF DANCE INC — $85,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetTHE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE FOR MOVIES AND THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetChabad of Iceland Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRidgefield Library Association Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTELFAIR MUSEUM OF ART INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNew York Historical Society — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHorace Mann School — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Anna-Maria and Stephe…The Ayco Charitable F…Jewish Communal FundSynchrony FoundationGs Donor Advised Phil…The Pfizer Foundation…Vanguard Charitable E…The Chicago Community…The Blackbaud Giving …Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…
Anna-Maria and Stephen Kellen Foundation Inc C/O Joel E Sammet & Co LLPNY26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Anna-Maria and Stephen Kellen Foundation Inc C/O Joel E Sammet & Co LLP · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Synchrony Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Chicago Community Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Denise and Michael Kellen Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Act of Connecticut — 1% of income from government
  • Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
  • The Ridgefield Playhouse for Movies and the Performing Arts Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Silver Hill Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Denise and Michael Kellen Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Denise and Michael Kellen Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines