Skip to content
Del E Webb Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Del E Webb Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
51
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$325k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$11MEducation$4.7MHuman Services$4.4MFood & Nutrition$2.3MHousing & Shelter$2.1MYouth Development$1.3MRecreation & Sports$756kPublic Safety & Disaster$733kOther$0
02FY2025 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $388k
  • $50k–250k30 grants · $2.7M
  • $250k+3 grants · $825k
$54,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$98M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARIZONA RECREATION CENTER FOR THE HANDICAPPED$325,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WESTERN NEVADA$250,000
DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$250,000
UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS$200,000
A R M OF SAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA$192,000
UNIVERSITY MUSLIM MEDICAL ASSOCIATION$160,000
TONTO RIM SEARCH AND RESCUE SQUAD$150,000
BILLYS PLACE$140,000
HOUSE OF REFUGE$125,000
JOY BUS$122,000
TOGETHER CALIFORNIA$100,000
AGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT$100,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA$100,000
BEYOND BLINDNESS$100,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY LAS VEGAS$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TOOTH BUDDS: $45k → 15%FORGOTTEN SOLDIERS PROGRAM: $35k → 6%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $100k → 9%BRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH: $150k → 11%NEVADA INSTITUTE OF FORENSIC NURSING: $95k → 9%CENTER FOR HEALTHY AGING: $25k → 10%TOOTH BUDDS: $40k → 15%STEP UP BISBEE NACO: $60k → 18%NEVADA INSTITUTE OF FORENSIC NURSING: $80k → 9%GENTLEMEN BY CHOICE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $30k → 13%STEP UP BISBEE NACO: $60k → 18%CHILDRENS RESOURCE NETWORK OF THE CENTRAL COAST: $200k → 10%CAROLS KITCHEN: $95k → 11%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER SAN DIEGO: $27k → 11%CAROLS KITCHEN: $50k → 11%AROUET FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%FRIENDSHIP CLUB: $40k → 11%AROUET FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%OLD TOWN MISSION: $85k → 14%AVIVA CHILDRENS SERVICES: $84k → 15%CASA DE AMPARO: $50k → 11%AGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT: $100k → 14%YARNELL REGIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER: $32k → 14%HARBOR CARE FOUNDATION: $52k → 14%YARNELL REGIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER: $30k → 14%TOGETHER CALIFORNIA: $100k → 14%YARNELL REGIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER: $30k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND: $50k → 14%WOMENSHELTER OF LONG BEACH: $30k → 14%HOMEMORE PROJECT: $50k → 14%FOSTER KINSHIP: $70k → 13%HOUSE OF RUTH: $75k → 14%UNIVERSITY MUSLIM MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $160k → 14%SHOES THAT FIT: $60k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $250k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $150k → 11%VERDE VALLEY CAREGIVERS COALITION: $35k → 14%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $50k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $50k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $50k → 15%NEW LIFE CENTER: $62k → 11%NEW LIFE CENTER: $50k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $150k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $100k → 11%BILLYS PLACE: $140k → 11%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PHOENIX ARIZONA: $25k → 11%REBUILDING TOGETHER VALLEY OF THE SUN: $25k → 11%DELIVERING DREAMS OF ARIZONA: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Del E Webb Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 73% of the giving stays in AZ; by stated purpose, 70%.

Del E Webb Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 61 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

61 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
125

Total granted

$19M
$8.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+14%

Still filing today

84%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2021 · $1.8M · revenue +337%
  • CC
    COCONINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2021 · $1.1M · revenue +278% · 45% of their budget
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR BLIND CHILDREN
    5× · 2018–2024 · $898k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $400k · revenue +196%
  • CC
    Chiricahua Community Health Centers Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $366k · revenue +32%
  • CQ
    COPPER QUEEN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $300k · revenue +238%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southeastern Arizona Behavioral Health Services Inc

Our mission is continually to improve the quality of life for the people we serve in collaboration with our diverse communities in a respectful, caring, culturally sensitive manner. The organization provides behavioral health services for…

Health
2
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

—
3
Tempe Community Action Agency Inc

TCAA's mission is to eliminate poverty and advance equitable communities. This mission is achieved through the delivery of comprehensive human services programs designed to improve housing stability, increase food security, improve health…

Community Improvement
4
Central Arizona Shelter Services Inc

The Organizations mission is to prevent and end homelessness among individuals and families while advancing compassionate community solutions.

Housing & Shelter
5
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
6
Vista Community Clinic

The mission of Vista Community Clinic is to advance community health and hope by providing access to premier health services and education for those who need it most.

Health
7
Adelante Healthcareinc

Mission: cultivate health by supporting individuals and the community at every step of their journey. vision: lead a future in which accessible, high-quality care sets the standard for all. adelante healthcare, a federally qualified health…

Health
8
Azcend

AZCEND nourishes minds and bodies so that neighbors in need experience a brighter future.

Human Services
9
Hope House of Sedona

Hope House of Sedona provides families experiencing homelessness access to safe haven, support, and tools for lasting stability.

Housing & Shelter
10
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
11
Family Promise - Greater Phoenix

Enable families on the precipice of homelessness, or currently experiencing homelessness, to sustain or gain employment, independent housing and self-sufficiency.

Religion
12
Tmm Family Services Inc

TMM's mission is to provide quality affordale housing, essential education, and stabiliity for qualifying low-income seniors, single parents, and veterans within the Greater Tucson area.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is House of Refuge Inc; the most unlike its peers is William Jessup University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

190 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 190 of the 218 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

19
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
63
Early backer (in before they grew)
189/190
Grantees still filing
118/190
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DIOCESAN COUN FOR SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $1,600,000 · OtherDIOCESAN COUN FOR SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE …CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY: $1,500,000 · OtherCREIGHTON UNIVERSITYDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $1,000,000 · OtherDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT …Arizona Recreation Center for the Handicapped: $650,000 · OtherArizona Recreation Center for the Handicapp…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER LAS VEGAS: $650,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER …+79 more: $5,956,791 · Other+79 moreHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,470,000 · HealthHONORHEALTH FOUNDATIONFOUNDATION FOR BLIND CHILDREN: $898,000 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR BLIND CH…Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $670,260 · HealthPhoenix Children's Hosp…Sierra Nevada Memorial Hospital Foundation: $380,000 · HealthSierra Nevada Memorial …Chiricahua Community Health Centers Inc: $366,000 · HealthChiricahua Community He…COPPER QUEEN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $300,000 · HealthLa Paz Regional Hospital: $250,000 · HealthVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $243,000 · Health+21 more: $1,580,813 · Health+21 moreNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,833,334 · EducationNORTHERN ARIZONA U…COCONINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,094,000 · EducationCOCONINO COMMUNITY…University of Arizona Foundation: $499,987 · EducationUniversity of Ariz…ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $400,000 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIV…CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $250,000 · EducationNORTHLAND PIONEER COLLEGE FRIENDS AND FAMILY INC: $228,000 · Education+12 more: $644,000 · Education+12 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $400,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHAR…HUSHABYE NURSERY: $250,000 · Human ServicesHUSHABYE NURS…Childrens Resource Network of the Central Coast: $200,000 · Human ServicesChildrens Res…BRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH: $190,000 · Human ServicesNEVADA INSTITUTE OF FORENSIC NURSING: $175,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY MUSLIM MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC: $160,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $150,000 · Human ServicesCAROL'S KITCHEN INC: $145,000 · Human ServicesBILLY'S PLACE INC: $140,000 · Human ServicesStep Up Bisbee-Naco Inc: $120,000 · Human Services+27 more: $1,646,200 · Human Services+27 moreHOUSE OF REFUGE INC: $367,000 · Housing & ShelterUMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC: $200,000 · Housing & ShelterARM OF SAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA: $192,000 · Housing & ShelterPrescott Area Shelter Services Inc: $172,000 · Housing & ShelterFLAGSTAFF SHELTER SERVICES INC: $130,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY LAS VEGAS: $125,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMES FOR FAMILIES: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterREFUGE FOR WOMEN INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING TOGETHER SOUTHERN NEVADA: $50,000 · Housing & Shelter+2 more: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterSAHUARITA FOOD BANK: $405,000 · Food & NutritionFundamental Needs Inc: $205,000 · Food & NutritionTHE JOY BUS: $122,000 · Food & NutritionWHITE MOUNTAIN MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $118,000 · Food & NutritionManzanita Outreach: $113,000 · Food & NutritionDIABETES PREVENTION AND AID FUND: $75,000 · Food & NutritionMOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC: $72,000 · Food & NutritionPRESCOTT COMMUNITY CUPBOARD FOOD BANK INC: $55,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $46,000 · Food & NutritionTEEN KITCHEN PROJECT: $625,000 · Youth DevelopmentACCELERATE EDUCATION GROUP: $196,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoys to Men Tucson Inc: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentSHINE TOGETHER INC: $50,000 · Youth Development+5 more: $127,000 · Youth Development
Other$11,356,791Health$6,158,073Education$4,949,321Human Services$3,576,200Housing & Shelter$1,436,000Food & Nutrition$1,211,000Youth Development$1,148,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,833,334 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,470,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCOCONINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,094,000 over 4y, 45% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR BLIND CHILDREN: $898,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $670,260 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetArizona Recreation Center for the Handicapped: $650,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER LAS VEGAS: $650,000 over 4y, 8.7% of budgetTEEN KITCHEN PROJECT: $625,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $499,987 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAHUARITA FOOD BANK: $405,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $400,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $400,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSierra Nevada Memorial Hospital Foundation: $380,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetHOUSE OF REFUGE INC: $367,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetChiricahua Community Health Centers Inc: $366,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHUSHABYE NURSERY: $250,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWalker Fire Protection Association Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA: $250,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetLa Paz Regional Hospital: $250,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $243,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNORTHLAND PIONEER COLLEGE FRIENDS AND FAMILY INC: $228,000 over 3y, 55% of budgetFundamental Needs Inc: $205,000 over 2y, 34% of budgetSEPSIS ALLIANCE INC: $200,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetChildrens Resource Network of the Central Coast: $200,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetUMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetACCELERATE EDUCATION GROUP: $196,000 over 3y, 35% of budgetARM OF SAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA: $192,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH: $190,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetNEVADA INSTITUTE OF FORENSIC NURSING: $175,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetPrescott Area Shelter Services Inc: $172,000 over 5y, 9.6% of budgetHumboldt Senior Resource Center: $159,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $155,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetWESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC: $150,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $150,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetCOLUMBIAN CHARITIES OF SIERRA VISTA: $150,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetCatholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Inc: $150,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCAROL'S KITCHEN INC: $145,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC: $144,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $137,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetREDWOODS RURAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $137,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC: $128,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY LAS VEGAS: $125,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetHEALTH CARE FOUNDATION FOR VENTURA COUNTY INC: $124,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetStep Up Bisbee-Naco Inc: $120,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetTUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON: $118,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetWHITE MOUNTAIN MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $118,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetManzanita Outreach: $113,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…The Diane and Bruce H…Thunderbirds CharitiesThe Foundation for Co…Virginia G Piper Char…Burton Family Foundat…BHHS Legacy FoundationPhoenix Suns Charitie…John F Long Foundatio…Jw Kieckhefer Foundat…Community Foundation …Fiesta Events Inc
Arizona Community FoundationAZ83.7× affinity79 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Burton Family Foundation · BHHS Legacy Foundation · Phoenix Suns Charities Inc · John F Long Foundation Inc · Jw Kieckhefer Foundation · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Fiesta Events Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Del E Webb Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Del E Webb Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    70report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 218 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Del E Webb’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home