Skip to content

· Private foundation

Del Corazon

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$900k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$240k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$2.9MEducation$1.8MHealth$857kFood & Nutrition$277kEnvironment$72kRecreation & Sports$68kReligion$67kHuman Services$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $842k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FUTURO BRILLANTE$240,000
SHARP HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$200,000
GLOBAL CARE ALLIANCE$162,250
CUREBOUND$100,000
NATIVITY PREP ACADEMY$90,000
PACIFIC RIDGE SCHOOL$50,000
THE UCLA FOUNDATION$25,000
USD BURNHAM-MOORES CENTER FOR REAL ESTATE$10,000
DYSAUTONOMIA INTERNATIONAL$10,000
WESLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$8,000
CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION$1,500
PEDAL THE CAUSE$1,000
ANGELS OF GRACE$1,000
THOUSAND SMILES FOUNDATION$500
THE NEW CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ANGELS OF GRACE: $1k → 19%ANGELS OF GRACE: $598 → 19%THE PATRIOT'S INITIATIVE: $250 → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $27k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $9k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $7k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%Challenged Athletes Foundation: $2k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
NV
OH
PA
CA
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.9M · 25 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
40

Total granted

$5.9M
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+29%

Still filing today

72%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FUTURO BRILLANTE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +48% · 80% of their budget
  • NP
    NATIVITY PREP ACADEMY OF SAN DIEGO INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $895k · revenue +98%
  • GC
    GLOBAL CARE ALLIANCE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $813k · revenue +12% · 52% of their budget

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • RO
    RENO-TAHOE OPEN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -4%
  • BL
    BLACK LIVES MATTER
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
San Diego State University Foundation Sdsu Research Foundation

To support and further the research, education and community service objectives of san diego state university.

Education
4
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
5
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
6
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
7
Naval Postgraduate School Foundation Inc

Our mission is to support the naval postgraduate school by providing funding and programmatic support for education, research, technology development, institutional initiatives, and community programs that advance national security and…

Education
8
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
9
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
10
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
11
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
12
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Futuro Brillante. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/41
Grantees still filing
30/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FUTURO BRILLANTE: $2,062,066 · InternationalFUTURO BRILLANTEGLOBAL CARE ALLIANCE INC: $812,554 · InternationalGLOBAL CARE ALLIANCE INC+1 more: $500 · InternationalNATIVITY PREP ACADEMY OF SAN DIEGO INC: $895,000 · EducationNATIVITY PREP ACADEMY OF S…PACIFIC RIDGE SCHOOL: $220,000 · EducationPACIFIC RIDGE SCHOOLUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $110,000 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIONHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $105,000 · EducationHIGH POINT UNIVERSITYUCLA FOUNDATION: $72,800 · Education+3 more: $35,500 · EducationSharp Healthcare Foundation: $705,000 · HealthSharp Healthcar…CUREBOUND: $105,000 · HealthCUREBOUNDDYSAUTONOMIA INTERNATIONAL INC: $30,000 · Health+5 more: $11,167 · HealthFRANCES KITCHEN PROJECT: $247,970 · OtherFRANCES KITCHE…UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $161,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF …UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO: $110,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF …WESLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $62,000 · OtherWESLEY UNITED …+38 more: $174,893 · Other+38 moreCalifornia Environmental Technology Education Network: $70,000 · EnvironmentCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $52,500 · Human ServicesBARRIO STATION: $3,000 · Human Services+2 more: $1,848 · Human ServicesRANCHO SANTA FE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $16,400 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyRANCHO SANTA FE FOUNDATION: $2,300 · Philanthropy+2 more: $375 · Philanthropy
International$2,875,120Education$1,438,300Health$851,167Other$755,863Environment$70,000Human Services$57,348Philanthropy$24,075

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFUTURO BRILLANTE: $2,062,066 over 8y, 80% of budgetNATIVITY PREP ACADEMY OF SAN DIEGO INC: $895,000 over 8y, 6.0% of budgetGLOBAL CARE ALLIANCE INC: $812,554 over 8y, 52% of budgetSharp Healthcare Foundation: $705,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetPACIFIC RIDGE SCHOOL: $220,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $161,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $110,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $105,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCUREBOUND: $105,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $72,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Environmental Technology Education Network: $70,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $52,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDYSAUTONOMIA INTERNATIONAL INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetGRAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION: $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetRANCHO SANTA FE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $16,400 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetRENO-TAHOE OPEN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGrossmont Hospital Foundation: $5,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDAKSHANA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $3,322 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBARRIO STATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO SANTA FE FOUNDATION: $2,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO PORT TENANTS ASSOCIATION DBA SAN DIEGO WORKING WATERFRONT: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetANGELS OF GRACE INC: $1,598 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA APARTMENT ASSOCIATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHSTAR TEAM FOUNDATION: $1,432 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHOPE HOUSE CORPORATION: $1,001 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALOMAR HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARRIO LOGAN COLLEGE INSTITUTE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOUSAND SMILES FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SAN DIEGO INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELP ME SEE INC: $245 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $115 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FUTURO BRILLANTE ↗
  • Who funds NATIVITY PREP ACADEMY OF SAN DIEGO INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL CARE ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Sharp Healthcare Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC RIDGE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CUREBOUND ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds California Environmental Technology Education Network ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
  • Who funds DYSAUTONOMIA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO SANTA FE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RENO-TAHOE OPEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds Grossmont Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DAKSHANA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BARRIO STATION ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO SANTA FE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO PORT TENANTS ASSOCIATION DBA SAN DIEGO WORKING WATERFRONT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of San DiegoCA22.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The Burnham Foundation · The Parker Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Del Corazon funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Del Corazon. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Del Corazon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph