· Private foundation
Del Corazon
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $842k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FUTURO BRILLANTE | $240,000 |
| SHARP HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| GLOBAL CARE ALLIANCE | $162,250 |
| CUREBOUND | $100,000 |
| NATIVITY PREP ACADEMY | $90,000 |
| PACIFIC RIDGE SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| THE UCLA FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| DYSAUTONOMIA INTERNATIONAL | $10,000 |
| USD BURNHAM-MOORES CENTER FOR REAL ESTATE | $10,000 |
| WESLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $8,000 |
| CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| ANGELS OF GRACE | $1,000 |
| PEDAL THE CAUSE | $1,000 |
| THOUSAND SMILES FOUNDATION | $500 |
| THE NEW CHILDREN'S MUSEUM | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FBFUTURO BRILLANTE8× · 2017–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +48% · 80% of their budget
- GCGLOBAL CARE ALLIANCE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $813k · revenue +12% · 52% of their budget
- SHSharp Healthcare Foundation6× · 2017–2024 · $705k · revenue +60%
Funded once
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMYone grant, 2022 · $25k
- RORENO-TAHOE OPEN FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -4%
- BLBLACK LIVES MATTERone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
To support and further the research, education and community service objectives of san diego state university.
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
Our mission is to support the naval postgraduate school by providing funding and programmatic support for education, research, technology development, institutional initiatives, and community programs that advance national security and…
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.
The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Futuro Brillante. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FUTURO BRILLANTE ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL CARE ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Sharp Healthcare Foundation ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC RIDGE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CUREBOUND ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds California Environmental Technology Education Network ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
- Who funds DYSAUTONOMIA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds GRAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds RANCHO SANTA FE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RENO-TAHOE OPEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds Grossmont Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DAKSHANA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BARRIO STATION ↗
- Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds RANCHO SANTA FE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO PORT TENANTS ASSOCIATION DBA SAN DIEGO WORKING WATERFRONT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The Burnham Foundation · The Parker Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Del Corazon funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.