Skip to content

· Private foundation

Deborah K Holmes Family Foundation Uad 0

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$200k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.3MPublic Benefit$221kArts & Culture$216kEducation$172kCivil Rights$108kReligion$66kEnvironment$61kHuman Services$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $150k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION$30,000
BLOC EDUCATION FUND$25,000
STATE DEMOCRACY PROJECT$25,000
HEARTLAND FUND$20,000
TIDES FOUNDATION$10,250
GAMP PARENT AND ALUMNI ORGANIZATION$10,000
MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE$10,000
EL SISTEMA USA$10,000
DOWN HOME$10,000
COLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION$5,000
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE$5,000
LATIN AMERICA WORKING GROUP$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
INDIVISIBLE CIVICS$5,000
PROJECT 440$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EL SISTEMA USA: $10k → 11%EL SISTEMA USA: $10k → 11%EL SISTEMA USA: $10k → 11%EL SISTEMA USA: $10k → 11%THE BRIGID ALIANCE: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
NM
KS
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 21 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
45

Total granted

$1.3M
$905k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
0%

Still filing today

71%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsInternationalArts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $90k · revenue +52%
  • PA
    PA Alliance Foundation
    2× · 2022–2024 · $51k · revenue +118%
  • GP
    GAMP PARENT AND ALUMNI ORGANIZATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $41k · revenue +553% · 27% of their budget

Funded once

  • TF
    TIDES FOUNDATIONHEALTY
    one grant, 2022 · $500k
  • FM
    FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $66k · revenue +7%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR WORKING FAMILIES FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
America's Newspapers

Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.

Employment
2
Register America

The organization is founded for social welfare purposes, including assisting with voter registration and advocating for policies which lead to increased voter registration in the united states.

—
3
Foreign Policy for America

Foreign Policy For America is a nonpartisan advocacy organization founded to strengthen support for principled American engagement in the world.

—
4
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
5
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
6
League of Women Voters of New Jersey

Through grassroots people-powered advocacy and organizing, lwvnj trains, mobilizes, and educates advocates to have a greater voice in government and influence public policy.

—
7
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
8
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
9
Institute for Public Accuracy

To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.

Arts & Culture
10
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
11
League of Women Voters of New Jersey Education Fund

Lwvnj-ef's nonpartisan voter education and voter protection work ensures everyone has the tools, resources, and confidence they need to participate fully at the ballot box and beyond.

Civil Rights
12
RepresentUs

RepresentUs is America's leading nonpartisan grassroots organization working for a government accountable to the people. We unite people from all backgrounds to defend democracy, root out corruption, mobilize action, and support campaigns…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rock the Vote; the most unlike its peers is Gamp Parent and Alumni Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/45
Grantees still filing
21/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TIDES FOUNDATION: $710,250 · OtherTIDES FOUNDATIONTIDES FOUNDATIONHEALTY: $500,000 · OtherTIDES FOUNDATIONHEALTY+44 more: $453,717 · Other+44 moreTHE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 · Arts & CulturePROJECT 440 INC: $35,000 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA INC: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $8,000 · Arts & CultureFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $66,093 · EducationGAMP PARENT AND ALUMNI ORGANIZATION: $41,090 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $40,000 · EducationPA Alliance Foundation: $50,862 · Civil RightsINDIVISIBLE CIVICS: $40,000 · Civil RightsYellowhammer Fund: $10,000 · Civil RightsNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC: $5,100 · Civil RightsLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsLATIN AMERICA WORKING GROUP: $5,000 · Civil RightsPENNSYLVANIA VOICE: $5,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $500 · Civil RightsNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT: $35,000 · EnvironmentLOUISIANA ABORTION FUND: $10,000 · EnvironmentNORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $10,000 · EnvironmentACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST: $10,000 · Environment+1 more: $1,000 · EnvironmentEL SISTEMA USA: $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $11,535 · InternationalIF NOT NOW EDUCATION FUND: $10,000 · InternationalT'RUAH: $7,709 · InternationalUNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC: $6,738 · InternationalFRIENDS OF JEWISH RENEWAL IN POLAND: $5,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,500 · International+1 more: $515 · International
Other$1,663,967Arts & Culture$173,000Education$147,183Civil Rights$126,462Environment$66,000Human Services$65,000International$43,997

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $66,093 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPA Alliance Foundation: $50,862 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetGAMP PARENT AND ALUMNI ORGANIZATION: $41,090 over 4y, 27% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEL SISTEMA USA: $40,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetINDIVISIBLE CIVICS: $40,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT 440 INC: $35,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT: $35,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $11,535 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOUISIANA ABORTION FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYellowhammer Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEmgage Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIF NOT NOW EDUCATION FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTrust Women Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA STANDS UP INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetT'RUAH: $7,709 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC: $6,738 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC: $5,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMusic for Everyone: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF JEWISH RENEWAL IN POLAND: $5,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WATERSHED CENTER INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTEXAS IMPACT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA VOICE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUERTO RICAN CULTURAL CENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS PEACE ACTION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELMORE BOLLING INITIATIVE INC: $1,021 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNION COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetASPETUCK LAND TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCISPES EDUCATION FUND: $515 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROCK THE VOTE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD AND ENVIRONMENT REPORTING NETWORK INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PA Alliance Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GAMP PARENT AND ALUMNI ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds EL SISTEMA USA ↗
  • Who funds INDIVISIBLE CIVICS ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT 440 INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds STATE DEMOCRACY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA ABORTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds Yellowhammer Fund ↗
  • Who funds Emgage Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND ↗
  • Who funds IF NOT NOW EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST ↗
  • Who funds Trust Women Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA STANDS UP INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds T'RUAH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC22.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · New Venture Fund · Impactassetsinc · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Hopewell Fund · NEO Philanthropy Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Prentice Foundation Inc · Park Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Deborah K Holmes Family Foundation Uad 0 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Deborah K Holmes Family Foundation Uad 0. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Aspetuck Land Trust: 28% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Deborah K Holmes Family Foundation Uad 0’s filings →

More from the funding graph