· Private foundation
Deborah K Holmes Family Foundation Uad 0
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| BLOC EDUCATION FUND | $25,000 |
| STATE DEMOCRACY PROJECT | $25,000 |
| HEARTLAND FUND | $20,000 |
| TIDES FOUNDATION | $10,250 |
| GAMP PARENT AND ALUMNI ORGANIZATION | $10,000 |
| MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE | $10,000 |
| EL SISTEMA USA | $10,000 |
| DOWN HOME | $10,000 |
| COLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE | $5,000 |
| LATIN AMERICA WORKING GROUP | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| INDIVISIBLE CIVICS | $5,000 |
| PROJECT 440 | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRTHE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC3× · 2023–2025 · $90k · revenue +52%
- PAPA Alliance Foundation2× · 2022–2024 · $51k · revenue +118%
- GPGAMP PARENT AND ALUMNI ORGANIZATION4× · 2022–2025 · $41k · revenue +553% · 27% of their budget
Funded once
- TFTIDES FOUNDATIONHEALTYone grant, 2022 · $500k
- FMFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGEone grant, 2023 · $66k · revenue +7%
- CFCENTER FOR WORKING FAMILIES FUNDone grant, 2022 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.
The organization is founded for social welfare purposes, including assisting with voter registration and advocating for policies which lead to increased voter registration in the united states.
Foreign Policy For America is a nonpartisan advocacy organization founded to strengthen support for principled American engagement in the world.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.
Through grassroots people-powered advocacy and organizing, lwvnj trains, mobilizes, and educates advocates to have a greater voice in government and influence public policy.
To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.
Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.
To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.
To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.
Lwvnj-ef's nonpartisan voter education and voter protection work ensures everyone has the tools, resources, and confidence they need to participate fully at the ballot box and beyond.
RepresentUs is America's leading nonpartisan grassroots organization working for a government accountable to the people. We unite people from all backgrounds to defend democracy, root out corruption, mobilize action, and support campaigns…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rock the Vote and the most unlike its peers is Gamp Parent and Alumni Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds PA Alliance Foundation ↗
- Who funds GAMP PARENT AND ALUMNI ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds INDIVISIBLE CIVICS ↗
- Who funds EL SISTEMA USA ↗
- Who funds PROJECT 440 INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds STATE DEMOCRACY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
- Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
- Who funds A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA ABORTION FUND ↗
- Who funds Yellowhammer Fund ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND ↗
- Who funds Emgage Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA STANDS UP INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Trust Women Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds IF NOT NOW EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST ↗
- Who funds T'RUAH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · New Venture Fund · Impactassetsinc · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Hopewell Fund · NEO Philanthropy Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Prentice Foundation Inc · Park Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Deborah K Holmes Family Foundation Uad 0 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Aspetuck Land Trust — 28% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.