Skip to content
De Miranda Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

De Miranda Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$504k
Granted FY2026still arriving
15
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$98k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$1.0MHuman Services$947kEducation$345kHealth$334kArts & Culture$232kYouth Development$57kEnvironment$24kOther$0
02FY2026 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $344k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $160k
$35,160
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UGANDA AIDS ORPHAN CHILDRENS FOUNDA$98,268
EL NIDO SCHOLARSHIP FUND$61,908
TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER$45,144
SOUTH BAY CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER$42,000
EL NIDO FAMILY CENTERS$40,260
HARMONY PROJECT$37,320
UNATTI FOUNDATION$35,880
PROMISE CHILD$35,160
Individual grant recipient$24,864
SPEAK UP FOR THE POOR$22,920
MOMENTUM$14,208
MILES JESU$13,920
STBERNADETTE CHILDREN'S MISSION TO$11,940
BLIND CHILDREN'S CENTER$10,104
FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION$10,104
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $917k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PROMISE CHILD: $35k → 12%PROMISE CHILD: $33k → 12%PROMISE CHILD: $31k → 12%PROMISE CHILD: $30k → 12%PROMISE CHILD: $30k → 12%PROMISE CHILD: $22k → 12%PROMISE CHILD: $19k → 12%PROMISE CHILD: $18k → 12%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ACHIEVERS: $26k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ACHIEVERS: $26k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ACHIEVERS: $24k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ACHIEVERS: $18k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ACHIEVERS: $18k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ACHIEVERS: $16k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ACHIEVERS: $16k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $45k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $42k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $25k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $25k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $24k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $23k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $20k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $16k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $15k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $15k → 14%SOUTH BAY CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER: $42k → 14%SOUTH BAY CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER: $38k → 14%SOUTH BAY CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER: $34k → 14%SOUTH BAY CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER: $34k → 14%SOUTH BAY CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER: $30k → 14%SOUTH BAY CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER: $30k → 14%SOUTH BAY CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER: $29k → 14%SOUTH BAY CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER: $28k → 14%SOUTH BAY CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER: $21k → 14%SOUTH BAY CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 18 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$3.7M
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+88%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesEducationInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EN
    EL NIDO FAMILY CENTERS
    10× · 2017–2026 · $408k · revenue +39%
  • SB
    SOUTH BAY CHILDRENS HEALTH CENTER
    10× · 2017–2026 · $306k · revenue +150%
  • HP
    Harmony Project
    10× · 2017–2026 · $269k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • FW
    FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2026 · $10k · revenue +88%
  • TB
    The Blind Childrens Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2026 · $10k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Miami Childrens Initiative Inc

The mission is to create a community-based network that develops coordinates and provides quality education accessible health care youth development programs opportunities for employment and safe neighborhoods for children and families…

Community Improvement
2
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
3
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
4
Institute for Human & Social Development

Institute for Human and Social Development provides excellent comprehensive child development and family support services through center based family child care and home visiting to the highest need children of 0-5 years old and their…

Education
5
Linda Vista Children's Center

We help children discover a way of dealing with life that is realistic, comfortable, and satisfying. Self-confidence is nurtured as children learn to rely on themselves and each other. The noncompetitive environment is one that allows each…

—
6
Children's Specialty Care Coalition

To ensure that children with complex health care needs have access to timely and high quality medical care, and that pediatric specialists are able to thrive in californias health care

Community Improvement
7
Child Empowerment International
Human Services
8
Hands Together a Center for Children

Our mission is to provide the highest quality early education and care to families of the working poor who are striving to gain stability, improve their lives, and emerge from poverty.

Human Services
9
Children's Health Council Inc

Children's health council's mission is to transform young lives by providing culturally-responsible best-in-class services for learning differences and mental health to families from diverse backgrounds regardless of language, location or…

Health
10
Options for Learning

Options for learning is a leader in preparing children and supporting families for life success through innovative, quality child development programs.vision: unlocking the promise of every child.

—
11
Northern California Children's Therapy Center

No child should go through life with a disability that could be prevented through early intervention.

Health
12
California Young World Inc

To provide a quality child development program in an atmosphere conducive to the development of the whole child.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Toberman Neighborhood Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Unatti Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UGANDA AIDS ORPHAN CHILDRENS FOUNDA: $877,984 · OtherUGANDA AIDS ORPHAN CHILDRENS FOUNDAEL NIDO FAMILY CENTERS: $407,900 · OtherEL NIDO FAMILY CENTERSEL NIDO SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $348,844 · OtherEL NIDO SCHOLARSHIP FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $131,304 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMILES JESU: $90,060 · Other+5 more: $244,645 · Other+5 moreSOUTH BAY CHILDRENS HEALTH CENTER: $306,325 · Human ServicesSOUTH BAY CHILDRENS HEALTH CE…PROMISE CHILD: $267,128 · Human ServicesPROMISE CHILDTOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $249,754 · Human ServicesTOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER …NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ACHIEVERS: $142,760 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ACHIEVERSUnatti Foundation: $266,108 · InternationalUnatti Fo…SPEAK UP FOR THE POOR: $55,524 · InternationalSPEAK UP …Harmony Project: $269,316 · EducationThe Blind Childrens Center Inc: $10,104 · EducationHELP ME SEE INC: $30,000 · HealthFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $10,104 · Health
Other$2,100,737Human Services$965,967International$321,632Education$279,420Health$40,104

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEL NIDO FAMILY CENTERS: $407,900 over 10y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTH BAY CHILDRENS HEALTH CENTER: $306,325 over 10y, 1.7% of budgetHarmony Project: $269,316 over 10y, 0.9% of budgetPROMISE CHILD: $267,128 over 10y, 2.1% of budgetUnatti Foundation: $266,108 over 10y, 27% of budgetTOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $249,754 over 10y, 1.1% of budgetCrown Jewel Club Inc: $57,284 over 4y, 57% of budgetSPEAK UP FOR THE POOR: $55,524 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetPEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK: $39,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHELP ME SEE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EL NIDO FAMILY CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH BAY CHILDRENS HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Harmony Project ↗
  • Who funds PROMISE CHILD ↗
  • Who funds Unatti Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ACHIEVERS ↗
  • Who funds Crown Jewel Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds SPEAK UP FOR THE POOR ↗
  • Who funds PEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds HELP ME SEE INC ↗
  • Who funds FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION ↗
  • Who funds The Blind Childrens Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Annenberg Foundat…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Annenberg FoundationPA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Annenberg Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization De Miranda Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from De Miranda Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to De Miranda Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to De Miranda Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on De Miranda’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home