Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dda Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.

Health$1.1MEducation$60kHuman Services$50k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARBOR DAY ENDOWMENT CORPORATION$50,000
THE RECOVERY FOUNDATION$20,000
THE MEND PROJECT$15,338
HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN'S FUND: $30k → 14%SOCIETY TO AID RETARDED INC: $1.0M → 14%THE RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $30k → 14%THE RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%THE RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Addiction Recovery Foundation
—
2
All for Recovery Inc
Health
3
Lindell Recovery Network

Lindell recovery network is organized exclusively for charitable, religious, and educational causes, more specifically to serve with the love of jesus christ those who are struggling with drug addiction by providing them with hope and…

—
4
Awaken Recovery Foundation
Health
5
Als One Inc

The organization is a partnership of world leaders in als research and care focused on expediting breakthrough treatments and ultimately a cure for als while providing resources and equipment to those living with the disease now. the team…

Health
6
The Release Recovery Foundation Inc

To provide assistance to individuals suffering from addiction and alcoholism and to their families.

Health
7
Just One Recovery

Drug and Alcohol Rehabilitation

—
8
Housing for Recovery

Housing for recovery is dedicated to providing safe, stable, and supportive housing environments for individuals navigating substance use and mental health challenges. through structured recovery housing settings, the organization promotes…

Health
9
The Archway Foundation

Assist in the recovery of individuals suffering from addiction through community based approach and spiritual development.

—
10
The Recovery Research Network Foundation Inc

To provide educational and support services to those seeking help with substance abuse.

Philanthropy
11
Naatp Foundation for Recovery Science and Education

To improve addiction treatment through science, technology, and education.

Health
12
Answer Als

To find solutions for people living with als now and for the future by utilizing knowledge of patients, leading researchers and technology to seek immediate solutions to improve the lives of those living with als until a treatment or cure…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Augies Quest to Cure Als Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOCIETY TO AID RETARDED INC — $1,000,000 · Human ServicesSOCIETY TO AID RETARDED INCTHE RECOVERY FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 · Human ServicesTHE RECOVERY FOUNDATION INC+2 more — $50,338 · Human ServicesHarbor Day Endowment Corporation — $50,000 · EducationTHE GRAY ACADEMY — $5,000 · EducationNEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthAugies Quest to Cure ALS Inc — $10,000 · HealthLifeline Recovery Services Foundation — $10,000 · HealthONE RECOVERY — $10,000 · Health
Human Services$1,115,338Education$60,000Health$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOCIETY TO AID RETARDED INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetTHE RECOVERY FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetHarbor Day Endowment Corporation — $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S FUND INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetM3nd Project — $20,338 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAugies Quest to Cure ALS Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLifeline Recovery Services Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetONE RECOVERY — $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE GRAY ACADEMY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dda Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines