Skip to content
Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative Inc

Dac is leading the largest global response of its kind, driving scientific discovery and aligning health systems to help people worldwide, including those in low resourced environments left out of previous efforts to fight alzheimer's.

$3.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$650k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$6.5MEducation$330k
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $2,318,750, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,542,155 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,223,405 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+1 grant · $650k
$82,500
Median grant
14
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION$650,000
TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER$187,500
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER$165,000
NORTON HEALTHCARE INC$100,000
SHARP REES-STEAL MEDICAL GROUP INC$100,000
DARTMOUTH -HITCHCOCK CLINIC$100,000
UNIV OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$100,000
MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE$100,000
SCAN HEALTH PLAN$82,500
COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH$82,500
UMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH - HARRINGTON$82,500
FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTHERN INDIANA$82,500
VIRTUA HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF)$82,500
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA TRUSTEES OF$82,500
EMORY UNIVERSITY$82,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%UMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH - HARRINGTON: $83k → 11%BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $313k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA TRUSTEES OF: $83k → 22%SHARP REES-STEAL MEDICAL GROUP INC: $100k → 11%UNIV OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $100k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $165k → 14%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA (MUSC): $83k → 12%MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE: $100k → 12%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $36k → 11%GLOBAL ALZHEIMER'S PLATFORM FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%AVANT INSTITUTE: $65k → 10%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $83k → 14%COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH: $83k → 8%FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTHERN INDIANA: $83k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI PHYSICIANS COMPANY: $50k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $250k → 9%ADVOCATE AURORA HEALTH: $125k → 7%VIRTUA HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF): $83k → 7%PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATE FOUNDA: $860k → 9%NORTON HEALTHCARE INC: $100k → 15%UMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH - HARRINGTON: $83k → 11%TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER: $188k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA TRUSTEES OF: $83k → 22%USC BHN: $50k → 14%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA (MUSC): $83k → 12%AVANT INSTITUTE: $23k → 10%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $83k → 14%COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH: $83k → 8%FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTHERN INDIANA: $83k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $221k → 9%ADVOCATE AURORA HEALTH: $125k → 7%VIRTUA HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF): $83k → 7%PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN: $405k → 9%TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $500k → 16%SCAN HEALTH PLAN: $83k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $56k → 9%ADVOCATE AURORA HEALTH: $125k → 7%BOSTON UNIVERSITY'S SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ANATOMY & NEUROBIOLOGY DEPARTMENT: $13k → 16%SCAN HEALTH PLAN: $83k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMP: $523k → 16%INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT: $224k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
IL
MI
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
AZ
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $1.2M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$986k · 81% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH FOR ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE · SPONSORSHIP

East Asia and the Pacific$231k · 19% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH FOR ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 12 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$3.7M
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+13%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2021–2023 · $813k · revenue +24%
  • AH
    ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK
    3× · 2022–2024 · $375k · revenue ×14
  • UM
    UMass Memorial Health Care Inc (Parent)
    2× · 2024–2025 · $165k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $36k · revenue +13%
  • BN
    BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -41%
  • U
    USAGAINSTALZHEIMER'Sgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
2
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
5
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
6
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
8
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group

Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…

Health
11
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
12
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Norton Healthcare Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
11/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $650,000 · HealthTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK: $374,733 · HealthADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORKSCAN HEALTH PLAN: $165,000 · HealthSCAN HEALTH PLANUMass Memorial Health Care Inc (Parent): $165,000 · HealthUMass Memorial Health Care Inc (Parent)FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF CLARK COUNTY INC: $165,000 · HealthFAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF CLARK COUNTY IN…COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH: $165,000 · HealthCOMMONSPIRIT HEALTHVIRTUA HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $165,000 · HealthVIRTUA HEALTH FOUNDATION INCMEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $100,000 · HealthDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center: $100,000 · HealthNorton Healthcare Inc: $100,000 · HealthSharp Healthcare: $100,000 · Health+4 more: $120,191 · HealthTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $813,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $527,104 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONTUFTS MEDICAL CENTER PARENT INC: $187,500 · OtherTUFTS MEDICAL CENTER PARENT INCTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE: $165,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWES…PHI CHI MEDICAL FRATERNITY INC: $165,000 · OtherPHI CHI MEDICAL FRATERNITY INCAVANT INSTITUTE: $87,728 · OtherPHYSICIAN ASSOCIATE FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES: $1,264,614 · Community ImprovementPHYSICIAN ASSOCIATE …INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT: $759,206 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FO…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $165,000 · EducationEmory University: $165,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $150,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $36,432 · Education
Health$2,369,924Other$1,945,332Community Improvement$1,264,614Civil Rights$759,206Education$516,432

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHYSICIAN ASSOCIATE FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES: $1,264,614 over 2y, 55% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $813,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT: $759,206 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK: $374,733 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $165,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSCAN HEALTH PLAN: $165,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUMass Memorial Health Care Inc (Parent): $165,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF CLARK COUNTY INC: $165,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetEmory University: $165,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMONSPIRIT HEALTH: $165,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIRTUA HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $165,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center: $100,000 over 1y, 82% of budgetSharp Healthcare: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUC HEALTHCARE SYSTEM: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $36,432 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGlobal Alzheimer's Platform Foundation Inc: $20,191 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Cancer Socie…President and Fellows…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Cancer Society IncGA15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · President and Fellows of Harvard College · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative Inc?

Find your warmest path to Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home