Skip to content

· Private foundation

Davis-Tailer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$191k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$338kHealth$180kEducation$164kFood & Nutrition$160kAnimals$136kReligion$51kHousing & Shelter$49kYouth Development$37kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $132k
$7,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE$30,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE$15,000
OFFICE OF DONOR AND MEMBER SERVICES$12,500
SEEDS OF HOPE$12,000
ST JOHN VIANNEY THEOLOGICAL$12,000
THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND$10,000
OFFICE OF DONOR AND MEMBERSHIP$10,000
THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF$10,000
CENTRO SAN JUAN DIEGO$10,000
ALL ROADS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
OUR CENTER$7,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
LONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%OFFICE OF DONOR AND MEMBER SERVICES: $13k → 16%THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND: $10k → 14%THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF: $10k → 8%OUR CENTER: $8k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE: $12k → 12%OFFICE OF DONOR AND MEMBERSHIP: $10k → 16%THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND: $10k → 14%OUR CENTER: $8k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE: $12k → 12%THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND: $8k → 14%OUR CENTER: $7k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE: $10k → 12%THON: $13k → 16%THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND: $8k → 14%OUR CENTER: $7k → 12%THON: $13k → 16%THON: $10k → 16%THON: $10k → 16%THON: $10k → 16%THON: $10k → 16%THON: $7k → 16%CENTRO SAN JUAN DIEGO: $10k → 12%SEEDS OF HOPE: $12k → 12%SEEDS OF HOPE: $12k → 12%SEEDS OF HOPE: $10k → 12%SEEDS OF HOPE: $10k → 12%SEEDS OF HOPE: $10k → 12%SEEDS OF HOPE: $10k → 12%SEEDS OF HOPE: $8k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE: $15k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE: $15k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE: $12k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE: $12k → 12%COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE: $30k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE: $12k → 12%COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE: $20k → 12%CENTRO SAN JUAN DIEGO: $10k → 12%COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE: $16k → 12%COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE: $16k → 12%COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE: $15k → 12%COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE: $13k → 12%COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE: $12k → 12%COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE: $10k → 12%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY: $8k → 12%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY: $8k → 12%ALL ROADS: $10k → 12%BOULDER SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $10k → 12%I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION OF: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 37 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
8

Total granted

$1.1M
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+104%

Still filing today

54%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthFood & NutritionInternationalHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $138k · revenue +18%
  • OU
    OUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +51%
  • BS
    BOULDER SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $49k · revenue +251%

Funded once

  • IH
    I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION OF
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • PS
    PENN STATE CANCER INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
2
Good Dog Rescue

To save dogs from high kill shelters and place them into loving foster homes. Prior to adoption our dogs will be vetted, spayed or neutered and nurtured to join a supportive and loving home environment.

Animals
3
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
4
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
5
Dogs Unbroken

Dog Rescue Dogs Unbroken supports Colorado dogs at higher risk for euthanasia evaluating their behavioral stability and applying training methods appropriate for their needs. The goal of helping each dog learn to make good choices in…

Animals
6
Environmental and Animal Defense

At Environmental and Animal Defense, our mission is to provide Colorado with access to affordable legal services for environmental and animal issues, in addition to protecting wildlife and their habitats through enforcement of the law. No…

Crime & Legal
7
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
8
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
9
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
10
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
11
Noco Humane

Our mission is to further the compassionate safe and responsible relationship between animals and people.

Animals
12
Best Friends Animal Society

To bring about a time when there are no more homeless pets. we do this by demonstrating and promoting exemplary animal care and building community programs and partnerships.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arizona Humane Society; the most unlike its peers is Rainforest Alliance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE: $106,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESEST JOHN VIANNEY THEOLOGICAL: $79,000 · OtherST JOHN VIANNEY THEOLOGICALSEEDS OF HOPE: $77,000 · OtherSEEDS OF HOPETHON: $76,000 · OtherTHONIndividual grant recipient: $51,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE CENTER INC: $50,250 · OtherOUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE CENTER INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $29,500 · OtherTHE V FOUNDATION FOR CANCER: $25,000 · Other+27 more: $245,750 · Other+27 moreCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $138,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOO…+1 more: $1,000 · Food & NutritionLONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $29,250 · AnimalsLONGMONT HU…COLORADO PET PANTRY: $26,000 · AnimalsCOLORADO PE…Defenders of Wildlife: $23,000 · AnimalsDefenders o…HOME FUR GOOD ANIMAL RESCUE AND PLACEMENT: $17,000 · AnimalsHOME FUR GO…LUCKY DOG RESCUE INC: $14,000 · AnimalsLUCKY DOG R…THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $11,000 · AnimalsTHE WILD AN…+1 more: $1,500 · AnimalsBOULDER SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $49,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE LUNG TRANSPLANT FOUNDATION: $23,000 · HealthLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR HOME FOR THE AGED: $21,000 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthThurgood Marshall College Fund: $46,500 · EducationMary's Meals USA Inc: $21,000 · International
Other$739,750Food & Nutrition$139,000Animals$121,750Housing & Shelter$49,000Health$49,000Education$46,500International$21,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $138,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetOUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE CENTER INC: $50,250 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBOULDER SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $49,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund: $46,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $29,250 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO PET PANTRY: $26,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $23,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LUNG TRANSPLANT FOUNDATION: $23,000 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR HOME FOR THE AGED: $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMary's Meals USA Inc: $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDONATE LIFE AMERICA: $21,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC: $19,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOME FUR GOOD ANIMAL RESCUE AND PLACEMENT: $17,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetLUCKY DOG RESCUE INC: $14,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSON OF A SAINT: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST OF HOPE PANTRY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Thurgood Marshall College Fund ↗
  • Who funds LONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO PET PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
  • Who funds THE LUNG TRANSPLANT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR HOME FOR THE AGED ↗
  • Who funds Mary's Meals USA Inc ↗
  • Who funds DONATE LIFE AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOME FUR GOOD ANIMAL RESCUE AND PLACEMENT ↗
  • Who funds LUCKY DOG RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds SON OF A SAINT ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO16.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · The Denver Foundation · Collins Foundation · The Catholic Foundation No Colorado · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Colorado Health Foundation · American Express Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Davis-Tailer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Davis-Tailer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Davis-Tailer Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Davis-Tailer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Davis-Tailer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph