Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

David S Shrager Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$66k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$464kReligion$102kPhilanthropy$20kEducation$11kCommunity Improvement$8kHealth$5kCivil Rights$200Recreation & Sports$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$66,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIGNATURE THEATRE$66,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $102) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $50 → 14%ARLINGTON THRIVE: $52 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$593k · 13 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
21

Total granted

$593k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+11%

Still filing today

85%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SIGNATURE THEATRE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $232k · revenue +61%
  • SA
    SITAR ARTS CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $180k · revenue +73%
  • MT
    MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +35%
  • GD
    GEORGETOWN DAY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -28%
  • PM
    Potomac Massage Training Institutegraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +138%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center Stage Associates Inc

See schedule o.inspired by our home city, baltimore center stage acts as a cultural catalyst for all communities to access theater in every form and engage in compelling conversations. programming: capture the collective imagination and…

Arts & Culture
2
Stages

Stages makes plays and tells stories that invite everyone to live more deeply and love more boldly.

Arts & Culture
3
Staretthe Directors Company Inc

The Directors Company is an award-winning not-for-profit theatre company with an extraordinary record in its mission to develop and produce groundbreaking new plays and musicals initiated and generated by outstanding directorial talent,…

Arts & Culture
4
Washington Performing Arts Society

Washington performing arts champions the arts as a unifying force. through collaborations with artists, educators, community leaders, and institutional partners, we bring wide-ranging artistic programs to stages, schools, and neighborhoods…

Arts & Culture
5
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
6
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
7
Philadelphia Theatre Company

Philadelphia theatre company is a vital civic institution dedicated to the creation of extraordinary theatrical experiences that reflect the essential issues and ideas of our time, and which foster connection, understanding, and…

Arts & Culture
8
Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc

The oregon shakespeare festival creates world-class theater, revealing our collective humanity through illuminating interpretations of new and classic plays, and inspiring a love of our art form for current and future generations.

Arts & Culture
9
The National Theatre Foundation

The national theatre foundation oversees and preserves one of america's most iconic theatres toward an innovative and inclusive future. while serving as the primary home for broadway in our nation's capital, the foundation also presents…

Arts & Culture
10
Apollo Theater Foundation Inc

The apollo theater is a commissioner and presenter; catalyst for new artists, audiences, and creative workforce; and partner in the projection of the african american narrative and its role in the development of american and global…

Arts & Culture
11
Arizona Theatre Company

ATC's mission is to create world-class theatre about what it means to be alive today - inspiring curiosity and creativity, sparking empathy and joy - bringing all Arizonans together.

Arts & Culture
12
Signature Theatre Company Inc

Signature theatre celebrates playwrights and gives them an artistic home. signature makes an extended commitment to a playwright's body of work, producing several plays by each resident writer and delivering an intimate and immersive…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Theatrewashington and the most unlike its peers is Potomac Massage Training Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Professional Ballet Compani…Cancer Support OrganizationsGovernment Accountability R…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr19%24%20–35yr15%40%35–55yr13%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr19%41%20–35yr15%51%35–55yr13%8%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
11%
4,913/43,141

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SIGNATURE THEATRE INC — $231,900 · Arts & CultureSIGNATURE THEATRE INCSITAR ARTS CENTER — $180,000 · Arts & CultureSITAR ARTS CENTERMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC — $35,000 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC+10 more — $4,798 · Arts & CultureTEMPLE RODEF SHALOM — $101,708 · OtherTEMPLE RODEF SHALOMTHEATREWASHINGTON — $11,500 · OtherTHEATREWASHINGTON+9 more — $1,158 · OtherSPUR LOCAL INC — $28,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $55 · PhilanthropyGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $5,400 · EducationGEORGETOWN DAY SCHOOL — $5,000 · EducationAppellate Project Inc — $613 · EducationPotomac Massage Training Institute — $4,500 · HealthNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $150 · Civil RightsARLINGTON THRIVE — $52 · Human ServicesMIRIAM'S KITCHEN — $50 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $53 · International
Arts & Culture$451,698Other$114,366Philanthropy$28,055Education$11,013Health$4,500Civil Rights$150Human Services$102International$53

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSIGNATURE THEATRE INC — $231,900 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSITAR ARTS CENTER — $180,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC — $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSPUR LOCAL INC — $28,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTHEATREWASHINGTON — $11,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $5,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN DAY SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPotomac Massage Training Institute — $4,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetThe Studio Theatre Inc — $2,720 over 3y, 0.0% of budget1ST STAGE INC — $1,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAppellate Project Inc — $613 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROUND HOUSE THEATRE INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWoolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc — $175 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $160 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHAKESPEARE THEATRE — $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC — $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZIMS FOUNDATION INC — $55 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $53 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARLINGTON THRIVE — $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIRIAM'S KITCHEN — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC — $28 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTS IGNITE INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC24.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Weissberg Foundation · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · The Shubert Foundation Inc · Dallas Morse Coors Foundation for the Performing Arts · The Shiloh Foundation · The Robert P and Arlene R Kogod Family Foundation · Galena-Yorktown Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc · Seattle Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization David S Shrager Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Round House Theatre Inc5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph