Skip to content

· Private foundation

David N and Ann Early Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$241k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$361kAnimals$224kHuman Services$108kHealth$77kFood & Nutrition$44kHousing & Shelter$14kArts & Culture$9kCrime & Legal$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $206k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEAGUE FOR ANIMAL WELFARE BATAVIA OHIO$44,960
LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF CINCINNATI & HAMILTON COUNTY$44,960
THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY FAMILY SCIENCES DEPT$25,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CINCINNATI$21,000
NOTRE DAME OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY URBAN EDUCATION$10,000
CINCINNATI ZOO & BOTANICAL GARDEN$10,000
MATTHEW 25 MINISTRIES$10,000
ALLIANCE OF CATHOLIC URBAN EDUCATION$10,000
JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH$5,000
MAY WE HELP$5,000
BRIGHTEN CENTER$5,000
CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$5,000
PROKIDS$4,000
OHIO ALLEYCAT RESOURCENEUTER CLINIC$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LEAGUE FOR ANIMAL WELFARE BATAVIA OHIO: $45k → 9%CINCINNATI ZOO & BOTANICAL GARDEN: $10k → 16%BRIGHTON CENTER: $8k → 10%NOTRE DAME URBAN EDUCATION CENTER: $15k → 11%LEAGUE FOR ANIMAL WELFARE: $43k → 9%CINCINNATI ZOO & BOTANICAL GARDEN: $10k → 16%BRIGHTEN CENTER: $5k → 10%NOTRE DAME URBAN EDUCATION CENTER: $14k → 11%LEAGUE FOR ANIMAL WELFARE BATAVIA OHIO: $42k → 9%CINCINNATI ZOO & BOTANICAL GARDEN: $10k → 16%BRIGHTEN CENTER: $5k → 10%NOTRE DAME OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY URBAN EDUCATION: $11k → 11%LEAGUE FOR ANIMAL WELFARE: $37k → 9%CINCINNATI ZOO & BOTANICAL GARDEN: $10k → 16%NOTRE DAME OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY URBAN EDUCATION: $10k → 11%MAY WE HELP: $5k → 16%ALLIANCE OF CATHOLIC URBAN EDUCATION: $10k → 11%MAY WE HELP: $5k → 16%ALLIANCE FOR CATHOLIC URBAN EDUCATION: $10k → 11%MAY WE HELP: $5k → 16%ALLIANCE OF CATHOLIC URBAN EDUCATION: $10k → 11%OHIO ALLEYCAT RESOURCENEUTER CLINIC: $3k → 16%THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY: $30k → 11%OHIO ALLEYCAT RESOURCENEUTER CLINIC: $3k → 16%THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 11%MAY WE HELP: $3k → 16%THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 11%THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 11%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CINCINNATI: $29k → 16%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CINCINNATI: $21k → 16%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CINCINNATI: $20k → 16%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CINCINNATI: $20k → 16%BETHANY HOUSE: $7k → 16%CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $5k → 16%BETHANY HOUSE: $5k → 16%CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $4k → 16%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH: $5k → 16%HEARTT ANIMAL RESCUE: $3k → 16%LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF CINCINNATI & HAMILTON COUNTY: $45k → 16%LIBRARY FOUNDATION FOR CINCINNATI AND HAMILTON COUNTY: $43k → 16%LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF CINCINNATI & HAMILTON COUNTY: $42k → 16%LIBRARY FOUNDATION FOR CINCINNATI AND HAMILTON COUNTY: $37k → 16%CINCINNATI ART MUSEUM: $7k → 16%PROKIDS: $4k → 16%MATTHEW 25 MINISTRIES: $14k → 16%MATTHEW 25 MINISTRIES: $10k → 16%MATTHEW 25 MINISTRIES: $10k → 16%MATTHEW 25 MINISTRIES: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of David N and Ann Early Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 69% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 0%.

David N and Ann Early Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$815k · 19 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
6

Total granted

$815k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+7%

Still filing today

42%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationArts & CultureInternationalHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    The Public Library of Cincinnati and Hamilton County Foundation Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $166k · revenue +28%
  • TM
    THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $82k · revenue +30%
  • ZS
    ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI
    4× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • BC
    Brighton Center Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +7%
  • CM
    CINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue -9%
  • HA
    HEARTT ANIMAL REFUGE
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cincinnati Animal Care Humane Society

We meet the immediate needs of animals in our community through individualized care, life saving solutions, and temporary shelter en-route to a safe, compatible home. we envision a community where all animals are valued, protected and have…

Animals
2
Legal Aid Society of Cincinnati

To resolve serious legal problems of low income people, to promote economic and family stability, and reduce poverty through effective legal assistance.

—
3
Humane Society for Hamilton County

Humane Society for Hamilton County (HSHC) is saving lives, educating communities and completing families by providing a compassionate and healthy environment for the homeless animals of Hamilton County, Indiana, until they can be placed…

Animals
4
Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio

Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio serves and empowers people through God's love in their times of vulnerability. We do so through a full range of local services that engage the community in building solidarity.

Human Services
5
Citizens for Humane Action Inc

Our mission is to serve the people and animals of Central Ohio by providing safe, temporary shelter and care for abandoned or otherwise homeless cats and dogs, and to reduce pet overpopulation by means of spay and neuter, education, and…

Civil Rights
6
Pets Without Parents Columbus

To be a resource as a no-kill pet rescue service

Animals
7
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
8
Strategies to End Homelessness Inc

Strategies to End Homelessness leads a coordinated community effort to end homelessness in Greater Cincinnati.

Human Services
9
Cumberland Valley Animal Shelter Inc

Provide shelter for homeless animals and prevent animal cruelty

Animals
10
Animal Friends Inc

To rescue, rehabilitate, and rehome animals in crisis, ensure healthy pets through education, advocacy, and affordable services, and inspire a community where the animal-human bond is celebrated and nurtured.

Animals
11
Columbus Zoological Park Association

Empowering people. saving wildlife.

Animals
12
Cat Adoption Team

To save the lives of homeless, sick and injured cats and to work with our community to provide feline expertise and quality programs and services for people and cats.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cincinnati Museum Association; the most unlike its peers is Alliance for Catholic Urban Education Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CINCINNATI: $90,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CINCINNATILEAGUE FOR ANIMAL WELFARE BATAVIA OHIO: $86,490 · OtherLEAGUE FOR ANIMAL WELFARE BATAVIA OHIOUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY FAMILY SCIENCES DEPT: $45,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY FAMILY SCIENCES DEPTUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $32,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKYNOTRE DAME URBAN EDUCATION CENTER INC: $29,555 · OtherNOTRE DAME URBAN EDUCATION CENTER INCNOTRE DAME OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY URBAN EDUCATION: $21,115 · OtherNOTRE DAME OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY URBAN EDUCATIONBETHANY HOUSE: $12,000 · Other+9 more: $43,800 · Other+9 moreThe Public Library of Cincinnati and Hamilton County Foundation Inc: $166,391 · EducationThe Public Library of Cincinnati and …THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC: $82,000 · EducationTHOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INCALLIANCE FOR CATHOLIC URBAN EDUCATION INC: $30,000 · EducationALLIANCE FOR CATHOLIC URBAN EDUCATION…League for Animal Welfare: $79,901 · AnimalsLeague for Animal …ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI: $40,000 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY…Ohio Alleycat Resource & SpayNeuter Clinic Inc: $10,414 · AnimalsOhio Alleycat Reso…+2 more: $5,400 · AnimalsMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $44,400 · InternationalMAY WE HELP INC: $18,000 · HealthCINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $7,000 · Arts & CultureThe Children's Theatre of Cincinnati: $1,000 · Arts & CultureProKids: $4,000 · Civil Rights
Other$359,960Education$278,391Animals$135,715International$44,400Health$18,000Arts & Culture$8,000Civil Rights$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Public Library of Cincinnati and Hamilton County Foundation Inc: $166,391 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetTHOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC: $82,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLeague for Animal Welfare: $79,901 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $44,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAY WE HELP INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetOhio Alleycat Resource & SpayNeuter Clinic Inc: $10,414 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBrighton Center Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProKids: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTT ANIMAL REFUGE: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSAVE THE ANIMALS FOUNDATION: $2,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBethany House Services Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI NATURE CENTER: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Theatre of Cincinnati: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Public Library of Cincinnati and Hamilton County Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds League for Animal Welfare ↗
  • Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI ↗
  • Who funds MAY WE HELP INC ↗
  • Who funds Ohio Alleycat Resource & SpayNeuter Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds Brighton Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ProKids ↗
  • Who funds HEARTT ANIMAL REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE ANIMALS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Bethany House Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI NATURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Theatre of Cincinnati ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH20.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Josephine S Russell Charitable · Andrew Jergens Foundation · The Scripps Howard Foundation · American Modern Foundation · L & L Nippert Charitable Foundation Inc Attn Carter F Randolph Phd · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · Horizon Community Funds of Northern Kentucky · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David N and Ann Early Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David N and Ann Early Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to David N and Ann Early Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to David N and Ann Early Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on David N and Ann Early’s filings →

    More from the funding graph