Skip to content

· Private foundation

David M Wark and Mary Ann Barrows Wark Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$448k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$759kHuman Services$615kPhilanthropy$388kEducation$230kScience & Tech$40kCrime & Legal$13kCivil Rights$8k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $408k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THINK SMALL$120,000
MOUNT ZION TEMPLE (FKA MOUNT ZION HEBREW CONGREGATION)$100,000
ST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATION (UJFC)$87,550
MAAYANOT COMMUNITY MIKVEH OF MINNESOTA$50,000
ST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL$50,000
THE JEAN LYLE CHILDREN'S CENTER$20,000
MAAYANOT COMMUNITY MIKVEH OF MINNESOTA$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $600k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%THINK SMALL: $120k → 14%THINK SMALL: $120k → 14%THINK SMALL: $120k → 14%THINK SMALL: $120k → 14%THINK SMALL: $120k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 8 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against -20% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$1.8M
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
-20%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $130k · revenue +64%
  • MM
    MINNESOTA MULTIFAITH NETWORK
    3× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue +135%
  • NH
    NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • NS
    NEGOTIATION STRATEGIES INSTITUTE (FKA SHADES LLC)
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY ACTION
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -20%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER ST PAUL
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Hillel

To enrich the lives of students so they may enrich the jewish community and the world.

—
2
Jewish Historical Society of the Upper Midwest

The purpose of the society is to promote the vitality and continuity of jewish culture in the upper midwest through preservation, interpretation and education.

—
3
Minnesota Jewish Community Center

The minnesota jcc is dedicated to strengthening our community by providing inclusive programs that inspire personal growth, foster connection, and promote well-being through arts, culture, education, fitness, early childhood, day camp and…

—
4
The Board of Jewish Education

To provide early childhood and jewish education to the community.

Education
5
Friends School of Minnesota

To prepare children to embrace life, learning, and community with hope, skill, understanding and creativity. we are committed to the quaker values of peace, justice, simplicity and integrity.

Education
6
Jewish Community Centers of Greater Boston

To advance the aspirations of families and individuals to enrich their lives, bodies and spirits, by providing the best in contemporary programs and experiences, informed by jewish values for today's jews and the people in their lives.

Human Services
7
Minnesota Jewish Community Center Foundation

The minnesota jcc foundation's sole purpose is to support the minnesota jcc.

Human Services
8
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
9
Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas

As the voice of the jewish community, to protect jewish interests & promote jewish ideals.

—
10
Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Mitchell hamline school of law is an independent law school that advances its mission through a combination of legal education, public service, and community engagement. it is dedicated to preparing students to practice law, while also…

Education
11
Park Square Theatre

To enrich the community by producing and presenting exceptional live theatre that touches the heart, engages the mind and delights the spirit.

—
12
B'nai Brith Hillel Foundation At Princeton

Cjl partners with students and other members of the princeton community to sustain and grow a welcoming, multi-faceted and pluralistic jewish community that is fully-integrated into the fabric of campus life and which provides personally…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The United Jewish Fund and Council St Paul Jewish Federation; the most unlike its peers is Jean Lyle Children's Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOUNT ZION TEMPLE (FKA MOUNT ZION HEBREW CONGREGATION): $624,000 · OtherMOUNT ZION TEMPLE (FKA MOUNT ZION HEBREW CON…ST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATION (UJFC): $172,550 · OtherST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATION (UJFC)+2 more: $18,000 · OtherThink Small: $600,000 · Human ServicesThink SmallST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL: $130,000 · EducationST PAUL ACADEM…JEAN LYLE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $100,000 · EducationJEAN LYLE CHIL…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $40,000 · EducationPresident and …THE UNITED JEWISH FUND AND COUNCIL ST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATION: $215,000 · PhilanthropyTHE UNITED …MAAYANOT COMMUNITY MIKVEH OF MINNESOTA: $120,000 · ReligionMINNESOTA MULTIFAITH NETWORK: $15,000 · ReligionNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $9,500 · Community ImprovementJEWISH COMMUNITY ACTION: $7,500 · Civil Rights
Other$814,550Human Services$600,000Education$270,000Philanthropy$215,000Religion$135,000Community Improvement$9,500Civil Rights$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThink Small: $600,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE UNITED JEWISH FUND AND COUNCIL ST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATION: $215,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL: $130,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAAYANOT COMMUNITY MIKVEH OF MINNESOTA: $120,000 over 2y, 49% of budgetJEAN LYLE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $100,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA MULTIFAITH NETWORK: $15,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $9,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY ACTION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Think Small ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED JEWISH FUND AND COUNCIL ST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds ST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MAAYANOT COMMUNITY MIKVEH OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds JEAN LYLE CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA MULTIFAITH NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY ACTION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David M Wark and Mary Ann Barrows Wark Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David M Wark and Mary Ann Barrows Wark Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to David M Wark and Mary Ann Barrows Wark Foundation?

Find your warmest path to David M Wark and Mary Ann Barrows Wark Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David M Wark and Mary Ann Barrows Wark’s filings →

More from the funding graph