Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

David M Wark and Mary Ann Barrows Wark Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$448k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What you fund
0160% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202024.

Human Services$600kEducation$270kPhilanthropy$215kReligion$135kCommunity Improvement$10kCivil Rights$8kOther$815k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $408k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THINK SMALL$120,000
MOUNT ZION TEMPLE (FKA MOUNT ZION HEBREW CONGREGATION)$100,000
ST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATION (UJFC)$87,550
ST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL$50,000
MAAYANOT COMMUNITY MIKVEH OF MINNESOTA$50,000
MAAYANOT COMMUNITY MIKVEH OF MINNESOTA$20,000
THE JEAN LYLE CHILDREN'S CENTER$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $600k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%THINK SMALL: $120k → 14%THINK SMALL: $120k → 14%THINK SMALL: $120k → 14%THINK SMALL: $120k → 14%THINK SMALL: $120k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 8 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against -20% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$1.8M
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
-20%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $130k · revenue +64%
  • MM
    MINNESOTA MULTIFAITH NETWORK
    3× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue +135%
  • NH
    NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • NS
    NEGOTIATION STRATEGIES INSTITUTE (FKA SHADES LLC)
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY ACTION
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -20%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER ST PAUL
    one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Hillel

To enrich the lives of students so they may enrich the jewish community and the world.

2
Jewish Historical Society of the Upper Midwest

The purpose of the society is to promote the vitality and continuity of jewish culture in the upper midwest through preservation, interpretation and education.

3
Minnesota Jewish Community Center

The minnesota jcc is dedicated to strengthening our community by providing inclusive programs that inspire personal growth, foster connection, and promote well-being through arts, culture, education, fitness, early childhood, day camp and…

4
The Board of Jewish Education

To provide early childhood and jewish education to the community.

Education
5
Friends School of Minnesota

To prepare children to embrace life, learning, and community with hope, skill, understanding and creativity. we are committed to the quaker values of peace, justice, simplicity and integrity.

Education
6
Jewish Community Centers of Greater Boston

To advance the aspirations of families and individuals to enrich their lives, bodies and spirits, by providing the best in contemporary programs and experiences, informed by jewish values for today's jews and the people in their lives.

Human Services
7
Minnesota Jewish Community Center Foundation

The minnesota jcc foundation's sole purpose is to support the minnesota jcc.

Human Services
8
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
9
Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas

As the voice of the jewish community, to protect jewish interests & promote jewish ideals.

10
Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Mitchell hamline school of law is an independent law school that advances its mission through a combination of legal education, public service, and community engagement. it is dedicated to preparing students to practice law, while also…

Education
11
Park Square Theatre

To enrich the community by producing and presenting exceptional live theatre that touches the heart, engages the mind and delights the spirit.

12
B'nai Brith Hillel Foundation At Princeton

Cjl partners with students and other members of the princeton community to sustain and grow a welcoming, multi-faceted and pluralistic jewish community that is fully-integrated into the fabric of campus life and which provides personally…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The United Jewish Fund and Council St Paul Jewish Federation and the most unlike its peers is Jean Lyle Children's Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MOUNT ZION TEMPLE (FKA MOUNT ZION HEBREW CONGREGATION) — $624,000 · OtherMOUNT ZION TEMPLE (FKA MOUNT ZION HEBREW CON…ST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATION (UJFC) — $172,550 · OtherST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATION (UJFC)+2 more — $18,000 · OtherThink Small — $600,000 · Human ServicesThink SmallST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL — $130,000 · EducationST PAUL ACADEM…JEAN LYLE CHILDREN'S CENTER — $100,000 · EducationJEAN LYLE CHIL…President and Fellows of Harvard College — $40,000 · EducationPresident and …THE UNITED JEWISH FUND AND COUNCIL ST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATION — $215,000 · PhilanthropyTHE UNITED …MAAYANOT COMMUNITY MIKVEH OF MINNESOTA — $120,000 · ReligionMINNESOTA MULTIFAITH NETWORK — $15,000 · ReligionNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $9,500 · Community ImprovementJEWISH COMMUNITY ACTION — $7,500 · Civil Rights
Other$814,550Human Services$600,000Education$270,000Philanthropy$215,000Religion$135,000Community Improvement$9,500Civil Rights$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThink Small — $600,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE UNITED JEWISH FUND AND COUNCIL ST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATION — $215,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL — $130,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAAYANOT COMMUNITY MIKVEH OF MINNESOTA — $120,000 over 2y, 49% of budgetJEAN LYLE CHILDREN'S CENTER — $100,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA MULTIFAITH NETWORK — $15,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $9,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY ACTION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Think Small
  • Who funds THE UNITED JEWISH FUND AND COUNCIL ST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATION
  • Who funds ST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL
  • Who funds MAAYANOT COMMUNITY MIKVEH OF MINNESOTA
  • Who funds JEAN LYLE CHILDREN'S CENTER
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College
  • Who funds MINNESOTA MULTIFAITH NETWORK
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY ACTION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization David M Wark and Mary Ann Barrows Wark Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to David M Wark and Mary Ann Barrows Wark Foundation?

Find your warmest path to David M Wark and Mary Ann Barrows Wark Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph