Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

David B Rothschild Mem Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10k
Granted FY2023
15
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192023.

Arts & Culture$16kPhilanthropy$15kReligion$14kEnvironment$5kHealth$4kHuman Services$2kCommunity Improvement$1kInternational$760Other$0
02FY2023 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$200
Median grant
6
States reached
$30k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAVINIA FESTIVAL$4,000
CONGREGATION HAKAFA$2,925
CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN$1,000
JEWISH COUNCIL ON URBAN AFFAIRS$700
WTTW$346
NORTHWOODS WILDLIFE CENTER$200
AMERICAN RED CROSS$200
ST JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL$200
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY$100
DIGESTIVE HEALTH FOUNDATION$100
NATIONAL TAY-SACHS ALLIED DISEASE A$100
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$100
SPECIAL GIFTS THEATRE$100
CHICAGO ACADEMY FOR THE ARTS$100
THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$35
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $900) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $100 → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $100 → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $200 → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $100 → 14%CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $300 → 14%CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
SD
VA
MD
AZ
AR
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$58k · 25 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2023, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
19

Total granted

$58k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+26%

Still filing today

76%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $235 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentAnimalsHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    3× · 2019–2022 · $15k · revenue +57%
  • RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2019–2023 · $8k · revenue +41%
  • TH
    THE HEARD MUSEUM
    3× · 2019–2021 · $3k · revenue +157%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWISH CHILD FAMILY SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $375
  • GI
    GASTRO INTESTINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $250 · revenue +584%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD
    one grant, 2022 · $200

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
2
Music Institute of Chicago

The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.

Arts & Culture
3
Chicago Historical Society

The Chicago History Museum strives to be a destination for learning, inspiration, and civic engagement. Through dynamic exhibitions, tours, programs, digital resources, and special events, the Museum connects people to Chicago's history…

Arts & Culture
4
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
5
Chicago Theatre Group Inc

The chicago theatre group is committed to producing both classic and contemporary works giving full voice to a wide range of artists and visions. by dedicating itself to three guiding principles - quality, equity, and community - the…

Arts & Culture
6
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
7
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
8
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
9
Chicago Zoological Society

To inspire conservation leadership by connecting people with wildlife and nature.

Animals
10
Lyric Opera of Chicago

We believe in the life-changing, transformational, revelatory power of great art and opera. Lyric Opera of Chicago exists to provide a broad, deep, and relevant cultural service to the Chicago region and the nation, and to advance the…

Arts & Culture
11
Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University Inc

The Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University ("The Auditorium"), an Illinois not-for-profit corporation, is committed to presenting the finest in international, cultural, community and educational programming to Chicago and to the…

Arts & Culture
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Chicago Lighthouse for People Who Are Blind Or Visually Impaired and the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersClassical Music EnsemblesWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Land Conservation Organizat…Government Accountability R…Christian Missionary Organi…Food Pantries & AssistanceCommunity Arts OrganizationsSenior Support ServicesVeteran Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and AdoptionCancer Support OrganizationsJewish Community Federations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%3%5–10yr18%7%10–20yr15%23%20–35yr14%20%35–55yr22%47%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%1%5–10yr18%1%10–20yr15%12%20–35yr14%7%35–55yr22%81%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,327

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
22/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONGREGATION HAKAFA — $13,150 · OtherCONGREGATION HAKAFATHE CHICAGO ACADEMY FOR THE ARTS — $1,100 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES LOSS PROGRAM — $800 · Other+30 more — $6,175 · Other+30 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $15,400 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROP…RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $8,000 · Arts & CultureRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATIO…THE HEARD MUSEUM — $3,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HEARD MUSEUMChicago Humanities Festival — $2,500 · Arts & CultureChicago Humanities FestivalSPECIAL GIFTS THEATRE INC CO ELISE LARSEN — $600 · Arts & CultureWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $546 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $35 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $5,000 · EnvironmentCHICAGO HO…NORTHWOODS WILDLIFE CENTER — $500 · EnvironmentNORTHWOODS…Endeavor Health Clinical Operations — $2,000 · HealthGASTRO INTESTINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $250 · HealthJewish Council on Urban Affairs — $1,200 · Community ImprovementCHICAGO CHESED FUND — $400 · Human ServicesTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED — $300 · Human ServicesNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER — $200 · Human Services
Other$21,225Philanthropy$15,400Arts & Culture$14,681Environment$5,500Health$2,250Community Improvement$1,200Human Services$900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $15,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEARD MUSEUM — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Humanities Festival — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEndeavor Health Clinical Operations — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Council on Urban Affairs — $1,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHICAGO ACADEMY FOR THE ARTS — $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL GIFTS THEATRE INC CO ELISE LARSEN — $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $546 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWOODS WILDLIFE CENTER — $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO CHESED FUND — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIGESTIVE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGASTRO INTESTINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIO ANIMAL FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORPHANS OF THE STORM — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Chicago Community Trust · Karmin Family Charitable Trust · Circle of Service Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · AbbVie Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization David B Rothschild Mem Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to David B Rothschild Mem Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to David B Rothschild Mem Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph