Skip to content

· Private foundation

David B Lynch Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$232k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.2MHealth$294kPublic Benefit$192kArts & Culture$123kPhilanthropy$57kScience & Tech$45kHuman Services$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $144k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND CHARITABLE GRANT$50,000
INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC DIALOGUE US$40,000
ELECTION REFORMERS NETWORK INC$40,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NANTUCKET$25,000
WGBH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$17,000
CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC$12,000
PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY$10,000
WBUR$7,000
NOBLE & GREENOUGH SCHOOL$5,000
ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE LOBKOWICZ COLLECTIONS$5,000
BRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL$5,000
ROBERT PACKARD CENTER FOR ALS$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FDN$2,000
JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NANTUCKET: $25k → 6%JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER: $20k → 16%HOPE FOR DEPRESSION RESEARCH FDN: $15k → 17%JOHN'S ISLAND COMMUNITY SERVICE LEAGUE: $20k → 12%IDF LIFE FOR A CHILD (USA) INC: $15k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FDN: $20k → 15%INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC DIALOGUE US: $40k → 18%REEVE FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND CHARITABLE GRANT: $150k → 22%ELECTION REFORMERS NETWORK INC: $40k → 8%ROBERT PACKARD CENTER FOR ALS: $13k → 19%PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $20k → 5%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $50k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NANTUCKET: $20k → 6%WBUR: $20k → 16%IDF LIFE FOR A CHILD (USA) INC: $11k → 19%INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC DIALOGUE US: $40k → 18%REEVE FOUNDATION: $11k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND CHARITABLE GRANT: $75k → 22%ELECTION REFORMERS NETWORK INC: $25k → 8%PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $15k → 5%INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC DIALOGUE US: $40k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND CHARITABLE GRANT: $60k → 22%ELECTION REFORMERS NETWORK INC: $25k → 8%PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $11k → 5%INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC DIALOGUE US: $40k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND CHARITABLE GRANT: $50k → 22%ELECTION REFORMERS NETWORK INC: $25k → 8%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHONOLY: $20k → 8%INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC DIALOGUE US: $25k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND CHARITABLE GRANT: $50k → 22%ELECTION REFORMERS NETWORK INC: $15k → 8%ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $13k → 8%INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC DIALOGUE US: $25k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND CHARITABLE GRANT: $50k → 22%ELECTION REFORMERS NETWORK INC: $15k → 8%INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC DIALOGUE US: $20k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND CHARITABLE GRANT: $20k → 22%DANA HALL SCHOOL: $20k → 7%NOBLE & GREENOUGH SCHOOL: $20k → 7%CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 16%CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $12k → 16%CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $12k → 16%CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $12k → 16%CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $11k → 16%WGBH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $17k → 16%WGBH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%WGBH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
OR
OH
NJ
CT
RI
VA
MD
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 23 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
2

Total granted

$1.9M
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+94%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC DIALOGUE-US
    7× · 2019–2025 · $230k · revenue ×12
  • ER
    ELECTION REFORMERS NETWORK INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $164k · revenue +509%
  • PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $106k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • JI
    JOHN'S ISLAND COMMUNITY SERVICE LEAGUE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +40%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KISHORIT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue +94%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
5
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
8
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
9
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
10
Fisk University

Fisk university produces graduates from diverse backgrounds with the integrity and intellect required for substantive contributions to society. our curriculum is grounded in the liberal arts. our faculty and administrators emphasize the…

Education
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Northeastern University
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Noble and Greenough School; the most unlike its peers is Election Reformers Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND CHARITABLE GRANT: $465,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND CHARITABLE GRANTTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $75,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYROBERT PACKARD CENTER FOR ALS: $67,500 · OtherROBERT PACKARD CENTER FOR ALSTHE REEVES FOUNDATION INC: $50,500 · OtherTHE REEVES FOUNDATION INCMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHONOLY: $36,000 · OtherAMERICAN PROMISE EDUCATION FUND INC: $28,000 · Other+3 more: $47,000 · Other+3 moreINSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC DIALOGUE-US: $230,000 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC DIALOGUE-USPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $106,338 · EducationPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMYCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $92,000 · EducationCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INCNOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL: $75,000 · EducationNOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $55,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATIONTrustees of Dartmouth College: $50,000 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth CollegeDANA HALL SCHOOL: $30,000 · EducationBRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL: $25,000 · Education+1 more: $20,000 · EducationALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $64,000 · HealthALS THERAPY …JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC: $64,000 · HealthJOSLIN DIABE…LIFE FOR A CHILD USA INC: $58,500 · HealthLIFE FOR A C…HOPE FOR DEPRESSION RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $39,518 · HealthHOPE FOR DEP…ELECTION REFORMERS NETWORK INC: $164,000 · Civil RightsELECTION …WGBH Educational Foundation: $65,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE LOBKOWICZ COLLECTIONS INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureCommunity Foundation for Nantucket Inc: $45,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KISHORIT INC: $12,000 · Philanthropy
Other$769,000Education$683,338Health$226,018Civil Rights$164,000Arts & Culture$105,000Philanthropy$57,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC DIALOGUE-US: $230,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetELECTION REFORMERS NETWORK INC: $164,000 over 8y, 21% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $106,338 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $92,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL: $75,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $75,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation: $65,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $64,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC: $64,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE FOR A CHILD USA INC: $58,500 over 9y, 8.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE REEVES FOUNDATION INC: $50,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Foundation for Nantucket Inc: $45,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LOBKOWICZ COLLECTIONS INC: $40,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetHOPE FOR DEPRESSION RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $39,518 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDANA HALL SCHOOL: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN PROMISE EDUCATION FUND INC: $28,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST GEORGE'S SCHOOL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN'S ISLAND COMMUNITY SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KISHORIT INC: $12,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC DIALOGUE-US ↗
  • Who funds ELECTION REFORMERS NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE FOR A CHILD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE REEVES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LOBKOWICZ COLLECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR DEPRESSION RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DANA HALL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PROMISE EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ST GEORGE'S SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds JOHN'S ISLAND COMMUNITY SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KISHORIT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY12.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David B Lynch Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David B Lynch Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Joslin Diabetes Center Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to David B Lynch Foundation?

Find your warmest path to David B Lynch Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David B Lynch’s filings →

More from the funding graph