Skip to content
David and Patricia Giuliani Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

David and Patricia Giuliani Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.9MCivil Rights$870kInternational$465kFood & Nutrition$300kEnvironment$295kArts & Culture$290kEducation$258kHuman Services$190kOther$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k28 grants · $490k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $630k
$20,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$125,000
FRED HUTCH CANCER RESEARCH CENTER$104,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$100,000
ORION CENTER FOR INTEGRATED MEDICINE$50,000
AWAMAKI US$50,000
CANCER LIFELINE$50,000
CENTER FOR AN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
FIND MY PARENT$50,000
FIELD ACADEMY$40,000
BEYOND TOXICS$40,000
WHITE BIRD CLINIC$30,000
CAREPOINT CLINIC$20,000
SAN JUAN COMMUNITY HOME TRUST$20,000
WASHINGTON WATER TRUST$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $10k → 13%SAN JUAN ISLAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $20k → 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $10k → 13%SAN JUAN ISLAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $20k → 10%SAN JUAN ISLAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $20k → 10%HOPELINK: $40k → 9%HOPELINK: $40k → 9%HOPELINK: $40k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MN
NY
OR
CT
CA
CO
MD
KS
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 37 repeat orgs$817k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against -35% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
8

Total granted

$4.3M
$313k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
-35%

Still filing today

73%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $505k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’22’23’24
HealthEnvironmentEducationCivil RightsInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $415k · revenue +10%
  • CL
    CANCER LIFELINE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $295k · revenue +44%
  • BT
    Beyond Toxics
    6× · 2017–2024 · $260k · revenue +161%

Funded once

  • OH
    OVERLAKE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF THE NW FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • SC
    SEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue -35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aclu of Washington Endowment Fund

To protect and extend civil liberties and civil rights by supporting the aclu-wa foundation.

—
2
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
3
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
4
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
5
Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

Health
6
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

—
7
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
8
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Oregon Inc

The aclu foundation of oregon is dedicated to preserving and defending civil liberties and civil rights.

Civil Rights
9
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services
10
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
11
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
12
Healthpoint

Healthpoint strengthens communities and improves people's health by delivering quality services, breaking down barriers and providing access to all.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Immigration Law Center; the most unlike its peers is Find My Parent. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/41
Grantees still filing
31/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $460,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODOVERLAKE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $250,000 · OtherOVERLAKE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Washington: $180,000 · OtherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of WashingtonORION CENTER FOR INTEGRATED MEDICINE: $150,000 · OtherORION CENTER FOR INTEGRATED MEDICINEFIELD ACADEMY: $140,000 · OtherACLU FOUNDATION: $110,000 · OtherFRED HUTCH CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $104,500 · OtherNMDP FOUNDATION: $160,000 · OtherNMDP FOUNDATIONHOPELINK: $120,000 · Other+28 more: $1,036,880 · Other+28 moreCANCER LIFELINE: $295,050 · HealthCANCER LIFELI…WHITE BIRD CLINIC: $140,000 · HealthWHITE BIRD CL…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $100,000 · HealthPLANNED PAREN…+4 more: $70,000 · Health+4 moreBeyond Toxics: $260,000 · EnvironmentBeyond Toxi…CENTER FOR AN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY INC: $210,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR …WASHINGTON WATER TRUST: $20,000 · Environment+1 more: $10,000 · EnvironmentAWAMAKI US: $305,000 · InternationalAWAMAKI USInternational Rescue Committee INC: $100,000 · InternationalInternatio…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $60,000 · InternationalMEDECINS S…SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $415,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN …UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $150,000 · EducationField Academy: $40,000 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · EducationSEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $12,500 · EducationNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $120,000 · Civil RightsTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $40,000 · Civil RightsREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $25,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Civil Rights
Other$2,711,380Health$605,050Environment$500,000International$465,000Crime & Legal$415,000Education$232,500Civil Rights$205,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $415,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAWAMAKI US: $305,000 over 6y, 52% of budgetCANCER LIFELINE: $295,050 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetBeyond Toxics: $260,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetCENTER FOR AN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY INC: $210,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Washington: $180,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE BIRD CLINIC: $140,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHOPELINK: $120,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $120,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN JUAN COMMUNITY HOME TRUST: $80,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetWASHINGTON BUSINESS ALLIANCE FUND: $78,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA: $70,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $61,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOYCE L SOBEL FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $60,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetOREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $42,430 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetField Academy: $40,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON WATER TRUST: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCarePoint Clinic: $20,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetWild Orca: $20,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetCELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRESILIENT HEARTS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $20,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES: $20,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SW OREGON: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUR CHILDREN'S TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AWAMAKI US ↗
  • Who funds CANCER LIFELINE ↗
  • Who funds Beyond Toxics ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR AN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Civil Liberties Union of Washington ↗
  • Who funds NMDP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WHITE BIRD CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds HOPELINK ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN JUAN COMMUNITY HOME TRUST ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON BUSINESS ALLIANCE FUND ↗
  • Who funds CASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds JOYCE L SOBEL FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FIND MY PARENT ↗
  • Who funds OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR LANE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Field Academy ↗
  • Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationThe Oregon Community …Morgan Stanley Global…The Pfizer Foundation…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …
Seattle FoundationWA11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David and Patricia Giuliani Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David and Patricia Giuliani Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • White Bird Clinic: 29% of income from government
  • Beyond Toxics: 13% of income from government
  • Center for an Agricultural Economy Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Food for Lane County: 5% of income from government
  • Oregon Public Broadcasting: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to David and Patricia Giuliani Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to David and Patricia Giuliani Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David and Patricia Giuliani Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home