Skip to content

· Private foundation

David and Laura Merage Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.4M
Granted FY2019
44
Grants FY2019
10
States reached
$875k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

77% of David and Laura Merage Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 14 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year David and Laura Merage Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 30 organizations, $2M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

16
’17
24
’18
30
’19
31
’20
22
’21
20
’22
23
’23
19
’24
14
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$13MHuman Services$3.9MHealth$1.2MReligion$1.1MArts & Culture$760kCivil Rights$439kCommunity Improvement$397kInternational$328kOther$0
02FY2019 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k25 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $187k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.1M
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$70M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Equitas Foundation$875,000
Early Learning Ventures$428,500
JPM Charitable Giving Fund$400,000
Black Cube$385,000
Executives Partnering to Invest in$60,000
Bipartisan Policy Center$50,000
Friends of the Israel Defense Force$33,000
Hebrew Educational Alliance$20,000
Persian American Womens Conference$20,000
Individual grant recipient$18,000
Arabella Advisors LLC$15,222
Jewish Colorado 2$10,550
Museum of Contemporary Art Denver$10,250
Mizel Institute$10,000
The Matthew Harris Ornstein Memoria$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $253k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Village Exchange Center Inc: $1k → 8%Wish for Wheels: $3k → 8%Bright by Three: $2k → 12%Shiloh House: $3k → 7%Visionary Women: $10k → 14%Visionary Women: $5k → 14%Belev Echad: $215k → 17%Bright by Three: $3k → 12%Jewish Family Service of CO: $3k → 12%Jewish Family Service of CO: $1k → 12%Wish for Wheels Inc: $6k → 12%WeeCycle: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
CO
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NC
SC
DC
HI
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 46 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2019, 18 since wound down; 67 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
16

Total granted

$13M
$270k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+34%

Still filing today

65%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EL
    EARLY LEARNING VENTURES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +127%
  • BC
    BLACK CUBE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +117% · 90% of their budget
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $389k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • E
    Equitas
    one grant, 2017 · $250k
  • JC
    Jewish Comm Center of OC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
2
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
3
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
4
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
5
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
6
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
7
The Denver Foundation

To inspire people and mobilize resources to strengthen our community.

Philanthropy
8
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
9
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
10
Jews of Color Initiative

The Jews of Color Initiatives mission is to advance racial equity in the U.S. Jewish community by centering the leadership of Jews of Color and ensuring that our communities and institutions reflect the multiracial reality of the Jewish…

Civil Rights
11
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
12
Colorado Fiscal Institute

To provide timely, credible and accessible analyses of fiscal and economic issues facing colorado to inform public policy debates and promote economic prosperity

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Little Imaginations Early Learning Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

92 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 92 of the 136 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
90/92
Grantees still filing
69/92
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $10,497,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTEARLY LEARNING VENTURES: $3,564,950 · PhilanthropyEARLY LEARNING VENTURESJEWISHColorado: $947,609 · PhilanthropyJEWISHColorado+15 more: $178,456 · PhilanthropyBLACK CUBE: $3,491,500 · OtherBLACK CUBEJPM Charitable Giving Fund: $1,616,500 · OtherJPM Charitable Giving FundEQUITAS FOUNDATION: $1,148,370 · OtherEQUITAS FOUNDATIONExecutives Partnering to Invest in: $398,000 · Other+76 more: $1,902,205 · Other+76 moreRedline: $335,250 · Arts & CultureFREE PRESS: $200,000 · Arts & CultureLION GLOBAL FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Arts & Culture+8 more: $31,110 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $251,000 · HealthHEALTHIER COLORADO: $240,000 · HealthTHE ARCHER GROUP: $32,500 · HealthJEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Health+11 more: $32,414 · HealthANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $388,770 · Civil Rights+2 more: $11,250 · Civil RightsBELEV ECHAD INC: $215,000 · Human ServicesVISIONARY WOMEN: $15,000 · Human ServicesWish for Wheels Inc: $8,800 · Human Services+5 more: $14,085 · Human ServicesBIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC: $105,000 · Public Benefit
Philanthropy$15,188,015Other$8,556,575Arts & Culture$646,360Health$580,914Civil Rights$400,020Human Services$252,885Public Benefit$105,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $10,497,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEARLY LEARNING VENTURES: $3,564,950 over 9y, 12% of budgetBLACK CUBE: $3,491,500 over 9y, 90% of budgetEQUITAS FOUNDATION: $1,148,370 over 2y, 100% of budgetJEWISHColorado: $947,609 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $388,770 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetRedline: $335,250 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $251,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHIER COLORADO: $240,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetBELEV ECHAD INC: $215,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFREE PRESS: $200,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetBIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC: $105,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF COLORADO: $83,145 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetLION GLOBAL FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetHEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO PHOTOGRAPHIC ARTS CENTER INC: $60,558 over 9y, 6.6% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $53,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KISHORIT INC: $50,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetTEAM FOR WEST VIRGINIA CHILDREN: $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCOLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGN: $45,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ARCHER GROUP: $32,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetHope Foundation of Iranian-American Jewish Communities: $26,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMOISHE HOUSE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVISIONARY WOMEN: $15,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DENVER: $11,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC: $10,123 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave the Children Action Network: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLA MAIDA PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPHILANTHROPY COLORADO: $9,233 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWish for Wheels Inc: $8,800 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDENVER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $7,860 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ENCINOS SCHOOL: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITA SOCIAL INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY: $5,145 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCraig Hospital Foundation: $5,125 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDAISM YOUR WAY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRose Community Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELLIS ISLAND HONORS SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $4,990 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHT BEGINNINGS: $4,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds EARLY LEARNING VENTURES ↗
  • Who funds BLACK CUBE ↗
  • Who funds EQUITAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISHColorado ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Redline ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHIER COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds BELEV ECHAD INC ↗
  • Who funds FREE PRESS ↗
  • Who funds BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds LION GLOBAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO PHOTOGRAPHIC ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KISHORIT INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM FOR WEST VIRGINIA CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGN ↗
  • Who funds THE ARCHER GROUP ↗
  • Who funds Hope Foundation of Iranian-American Jewish Communities ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MOISHE HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO46.2× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Boettcher Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · Gary Philanthropy · Libertygives Foundation · El Pomar Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David and Laura Merage Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David and Laura Merage Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to David and Laura Merage Foundation?

Find your warmest path to David and Laura Merage Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 136 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David and Laura Merage’s filings →

More from the funding graph