· Public charity
Daughters of Charity Foundation
The Foundations purpose is to engage in the solicitation, receipt and administration of contributions and their disbursements to and for the benefit of the Daughters of Charity of St.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 22 grants below total $16,241,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $19,175,310 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,934,310 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $573k
- $250k+16 grants · $16M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Ministry Services of the DOC of St Vincent de Paul | $1,832,000 |
| St Vincent's - Santa Barbara | $1,566,000 |
| St Patrick School | $1,100,000 |
| St Louise Resource Services | $1,100,000 |
| Mt St Josep - St Elizabeth | $1,100,000 |
| Our Lady of the Miraculous Medal School | $1,070,000 |
| De Marillac Academy | $975,000 |
| St Vincent School | $950,000 |
| Mother of Sorrows | $950,000 |
| Our Lady of Talpa School | $950,000 |
| St Elizabeth Seton School | $900,000 |
| Our Lady of the Visitacion School | $900,000 |
| St Vincent de Paul School | $750,000 |
| GRACE | $600,000 |
| Villa Siena | $500,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $14.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SVST VINCENT'S INSTITUTION9× · 2017–2025 · $15M · revenue +139% · 39% of their budget
- MSMount St Joseph-St Elizabeth9× · 2017–2025 · $15M · revenue +85% · 39% of their budget
- SLST LOUISE RESOURCE SERVICES6× · 2018–2025 · $6.4M · revenue +9% · 82% of their budget
Funded once
- MOMother of Sorrowsone grant, 2017 · $1.0M
- SVSt Vincent Meals on Wheelsone grant, 2017 · $1.0M
- SLSt Louis Rsource Servicesone grant, 2017 · $899k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Catholic Charities provides social services and administers various governmental and social programs. Designed to meet the challenge of the ever-changing community by utilizing spiritual, human and financial resources, our programs enable…
Charity
St. vincent depaul middletown (svdm) was founded in 1980 by the sisters of mercy and the catholic diocese of norwich. svdm's mission is to provide food, shelter and basic human services to poor and homeless individuals regardless of race,…
Catholic charities creates access to opportunities for self-sufficiency by providing innovative and compassionate services to people of all backgrounds, beliefs, and cultures.
Inspired by Gospel values, the Society of St. Vincent de Paul, a Catholic lay organization, leads women and men to join together to grow spiritually by offering person-to-person service to the needy and suffering in the tradition of its…
Inspired by the Gospel mandates to love, serve and teach, Catholic Charities provides care and services to improve the lives of Marylanders in need.
St. Elizabeth Catholic Charities exists to affirm the dignity of and respect for all human life by assisting individuals and families in need to achieve empowerment and self-sufficiency.
For the performance of charitable acts and service to the less fortunate.
Assisting elderly as a witness to the Presence of Christ
A network of friends, inspired, by Gospel values, growing in holiness and building a more just worls through personal relationships with and service to people in need.
To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louise Resource Services and the most unlike its peers is Give Me a Chance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST VINCENT'S INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds Mount St Joseph-St Elizabeth ↗
- Who funds ST LOUISE RESOURCE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Villa Siena ↗
- Who funds GIVE ME A CHANCE INC ↗
- Who funds GRACE ↗
- Who funds Rosalie Rendu Inc ↗
- Who funds Daughters of Charity Foundation ↗
- Who funds DEPAUL USA INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE SHARING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MARIAN OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds LADIES OF CHARITY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL OF SALT LAKE CITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Daughters of Charity Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.