· Private foundation
Dass Family Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND | $4,575 |
| KIND FOOT PRINT | $4,000 |
| MANNA FOOD BANK | $3,000 |
| SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| ASHA FOR EDUCATION | $2,000 |
| LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO - STRITCH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE | $1,750 |
| ADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION | $1,250 |
| WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT | $1,000 |
| CHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| ALL HANDS AND HEARTS | $1,000 |
| DANCE MARATHON - SHANDS CHILDREN HOSPITAL | $750 |
| UF BISHAN & ANJANA DASS MEMORIAL FOSE | $500 |
| LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KFKIND FOOTPRINT2× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +227%
- PBPalm Beach County Food Bank Inc2× · 2020–2021 · $8k · revenue +48%
- MBMAGIC BUS USA2× · 2021–2023 · $8k · revenue +76%
Funded once
- USUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +106%
- SMSELECTIVE MUTISM RESEARCH INSTITUTEone grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue -25%
- SHSUNCOAST HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the foundation is to simultaneously address childhood hunger and malnutrition and to promote education for children throughout india.
To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.
We support, through philanthropic efforts, the improvement of urological care globally by funding research, clinical education, patient education, and humanitarian programs.
The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…
Organization mission: florida's children first is a non-profit, nonpartisan, independent advocacy organization committed to protecting and advancing the rights of children and youth impacted by the child welfare, juvenile justice, and…
The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.
To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.
Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…
At conquering chd we exist to conquerin the most common birth defect. we engage, listen, learn, and act. we create visibility and empower all impacted by chd. we accomplish this through awareness, knowledge, community and research.
The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…
Our mission is to enable and finance the development of life-saving genetic medicines for ultra-rare patient populations previously deemed too rare to treat. to realize this, our unique ecosystems facilitates collaboration between…
Transparency is key: we believe spent contributions should be accounted for in this non-profit and thats exactly why we pledge to share our financials for every effort. you, our loyal patrons, will have transparency into how our funds are…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Selective Mutism Research Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC ↗
- Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SELECTIVE MUTISM RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds KIND FOOTPRINT ↗
- Who funds Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds MAGIC BUS USA ↗
- Who funds THE PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds CHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PALM BEACH INDIA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
- Who funds Little Smiles Inc ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Asha for Education ↗
- Who funds ADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BAVAJI CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds JUPITER POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
- Who funds LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTOPHER AGUIRRE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds QUANTUM HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE HOMETOWN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CANES BASEBALL CORP ↗
- Who funds Hope For The Warriors ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Admirals Cove Foundation Inc · Children's Healthcare Charity Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dass Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Epilepsy Foundation of America — 22% of income from government
- The Lord's Place Inc — 12% of income from government
- Florida Sheriffs Association Inc — 4% of income from government
- Center for Creative Education — 2% of income from government
- Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc — 0% of income from government
- Jack the Bike Man Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.