Skip to content

· Public charity

Darke County United Way Inc

To increase the capacity to care for one another.

$386k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$1.3MHealth$510kHuman Services$277kCommunity Improvement$147kFood & Nutrition$111kEducation$103kPublic Safety & Disaster$59kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $374,023, the rows itemized in this filing. The $385,856 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,833 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $311k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$947k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORS-GATEWAY YOUTH$56,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENVILLE$45,000
20242025 DESIGNATIONS$34,023
CANCER ASSOCIATION OF DARKE CO$32,500
Individual grant recipient$28,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$27,600
COMMUNITY UNITY$25,000
CORS-ACES$25,000
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP$17,000
GRACE RESURRECTION ASSOCIATION$15,000
RECOVERY & WELLNESS OF MIDWEST OH$14,000
BRIDGES TO COLLEGE$13,300
EMPOWERING DARKE COUNTY YOUTH$13,100
DARKE COUNTY SENIOR OUTREACH$11,500
DARKE COUNTY YMCA - CHILDCARE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $334k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GRACE RESURRECTION ASSOCIATION: $19k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $17k → 11%GRACE RESURRECTION ASSOCIATIO: $17k → 11%GRACE RESURRECTION ASSOCIATION: $15k → 11%GRACE RESURRECTION ASSOCIATIO: $15k → 11%GRACE RESURRECTION ASSOCIATION: $15k → 11%DARKE COUNTY YMCA-CHILDCARE: $15k → 11%GRACE RESURRECTION ASSOCIATION: $15k → 11%GRACE RESURRECTION ASSOCIATION: $15k → 11%GRACE RESURRECTION ASSOCIATION: $15k → 11%DARKE COUNTY YMCA FINANCIAL ASST: $14k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $13k → 11%DARKE COUNTY YMCA - CHILDCARE: $13k → 11%DARKE COUNTY YMCA CHILD CARE: $12k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $12k → 11%GRACE RESURRECTION ASSOCIATION: $11k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $11k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $10k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $10k → 11%DARKE COUNTY YMCA-CHILDCARE: $10k → 11%DARKE COUNTY YMCA - CHILDCARE: $10k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $9k → 11%FISH: $8k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $8k → 11%DARKE COUNTY YMCA-CHILDCARE: $8k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $7k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $6k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 17 repeat orgs$238k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
8

Total granted

$2.6M
$193k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+81%

Still filing today

47%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COUNCIL ON RURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $624k · revenue +16%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREENVILLEINC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $316k · revenue +84% · 71% of their budget
  • CA
    CANCER ASSOCIATION OF DARKE COUNTY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $274k · revenue +54% · 25% of their budget

Funded once

  • 2D
    2223 DESIGNATIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $43k
  • 2D
    20232024 DESIGNATIONS
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2020 · $36k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Darke County Recovery Services Inc

Prevention of drug & alcohol abuse and provide mental health services.

Health
2
Indiana County Community Action Program

Provide resources for low income clients.

Human Services
3
Greenbrier County Committee On Aging Inc

The organization operates a senior citizen's center in greenbrier county west virgnia. senior citizens are provided with transportation, nutrition, in-home care and other personal and social services.

Human Services
4
Fish Choice Pantry

Community food pantry

Food & Nutrition
5
Minerva Area Commission On Aging

To serve the elderly.

Human Services
6
Greene County Council On Aging

The council promotes independence and quality of life for greene county senior citizens by facilitating and supporting the development, implementation, and continual improvement of a comprehensive and coordinated system of contact and care.

Human Services
7
Family Health Services of Darke County Inc

Provide primary health care services for low-income individuals by managing & operating a health facility & its programs for all darke county residents.

Health
8
Tri-County Community Action Agency Inc

To help the general welfare of the community by providing services to the elderly and low income persons in oldham, trimble, and henry counties in ky.

—
9
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
10
Darke County Sheriff's Patrol

Social welfare organization

—
11
Christian Care

Provide meals, clothing, counseling, referrals, spiritual guidance and shelter to anyone in need without charge

Housing & Shelter
12
Yancey County Committee On Aging Inc

Provide services for elderly

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Social Services of the Miami Valley; the most unlike its peers is Cancer Association of Darke County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COUNCIL ON RURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS INC: $624,075 · OtherCOUNCIL ON RURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS INCBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $340,912 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSRECOVERY & WELLNESS OF MIDWEST OH: $124,650 · OtherRECOVERY & WELLNESS OF MIDWEST OHIndividual grant recipient: $112,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOMMUNITY UNITY: $110,720 · OtherCOMMUNITY UNITYBRIDGES TO COLLEGE: $103,300 · OtherBRIDGES TO COLLEGEEMPOWERING DARKE COUNTY YOUTH: $79,100 · Other+13 more: $389,351 · Other+13 moreGRACE RESURRECTION ASSN FOR CHRISTIAN ENDEAVORS: $136,875 · Human ServicesGRACE RESURRE…MIAMI VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $108,192 · Human ServicesMIAMI VALLEY …DARKE COUNTY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $80,513 · Human ServicesDARKE COUNTY …+1 more: $8,000 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREENVILLEINC: $315,688 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIR…CANCER ASSOCIATION OF DARKE COUNTY: $274,375 · HealthCANCER ASSO…SAFEHAVEN INC: $11,987 · Health
Other$1,884,308Human Services$333,580Youth Development$315,688Health$286,362

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOUNCIL ON RURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS INC: $624,075 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREENVILLEINC: $315,688 over 9y, 71% of budgetCANCER ASSOCIATION OF DARKE COUNTY: $274,375 over 9y, 25% of budgetGRACE RESURRECTION ASSN FOR CHRISTIAN ENDEAVORS: $136,875 over 9y, 20% of budgetMIAMI VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $108,192 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDARKE COUNTY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $80,513 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE MIAMI VALLEY: $37,190 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR MEDICAL EMERGERCIES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 68% of budgetSAFEHAVEN INC: $11,987 over 2y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COUNCIL ON RURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREENVILLEINC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER ASSOCIATION OF DARKE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds GRACE RESURRECTION ASSN FOR CHRISTIAN ENDEAVORS ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds DARKE COUNTY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE MIAMI VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR MEDICAL EMERGERCIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FISH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harry D Stephens Memorial IncOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harry D Stephens Memorial Inc · Ketrow Foundation · Lydia Schaurer Memorial Trust Fund · Shared Harvest Foodbank Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Darke County United Way Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Darke County United Way Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Darke County United Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph