Skip to content

· Private foundation

Darald & Julie Libby Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$130k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$204kArts & Culture$162kEducation$120kPhilanthropy$78kHuman Services$56kHealth$33kCrime & Legal$25kFood & Nutrition$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
$9,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$920k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALMOST HOME RESCUE OF NEW ENGLAND$30,000
PENINSULA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$15,000
THE NAPLES PLAYERS$15,000
SMITHVILLE COMMUNITY COALITION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
AMY POSOCCO LEGACY FUND MOVING MOUN$10,000
THE STUDIO PLAYERS$9,000
NEIGHBORHOOD CARE CENTER$7,000
UNCHAINING MOORE DOGS$5,000
ROGUE VALLEY GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY$5,000
BRIDGE OF HEARTS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NICK STRONG FOUNDATION$3,000
JINGLED ELVES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EVA'S CLOSET AND FOUNDATION: $600 → 11%BRIDGE OF HEARTS: $10k → 9%BRIDGE OF HEARTS: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
NY
MA
OH
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$765k · 17 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
27

Total granted

$765k
$144k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+8%

Still filing today

47%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NAPLES PLAYERS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $138k · revenue +106%
  • SP
    STUDIO PLAYERS INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +45%
  • Feeding America
    3× · 2021–2023 · $17k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CRIMINOLOGYINC
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -1%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • I
    ISLAH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeast Animal Shelter Inc

To provide, promote, and advance humane protection, care and treatment of animals thru education of the public and the operation of an animal shelter which cares for, spays and neuters, and places homeless pets in permanent homes.

—
2
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
3
New Hampshire Historical Society

To educate a diverse public about the significance of New Hampshire's past and its relationship to our lives today. To this end, the Society collects, preserves, and interprets material pertaining to New Hampshire history.

Arts & Culture
4
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
5
North Carolina Medical Society

To organize members of the medical profession to advance medical science.

—
6
Pines of Sarasota Foundation Inc

Pines of sarasota foundation secures funding to provide compassionate care, vital resources, and financial assistance for the seniors, children, and the nursing community serving them.

Health
7
The North Carolina Aquarium Society

The purpose of the Society is to develop, encourage, and promote public awareness of, interest in, and support for the NC Aquariums and to serve as an philanthropic society for the continued maintenance, support, and promotion of the…

Animals
8
Nantucket Historical Association

The nantucket historical association preserves and interprets the history of nantucket through its programs, collections, and properties, in order to promote the island's significance and foster an appreciation of it among all audiences.

Arts & Culture
9
National Association of Corporate Directors New England Chapter Inc

The organization promotes high professional standards and provides governance education to boards of directors and senior corporate management.

Philanthropy
10
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
11
National Perinatal Information Center

The national perinatal information center (npic) is dedicated to the improvement of perinatal health through comparative data analysis, program evaluation, health services research and professional continuing education.

Health
12
Pediatric Specialty Group Inc

Pediatric specialty group, inc. (d/b/a nicklaus children's pediatric specialists ("ncps")) is a physician-directed, multi-specialty pediatric group with a regional, national, and international presence in providing pediatric-centric care…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Naples Players Inc; the most unlike its peers is Islah. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/30
Grantees still filing
20/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALMOST HOME RESCUE OF NEW ENGLAND: $215,000 · OtherALMOST HOME RESCUE OF NEW ENGLANDUNIVERSIRY OF ALBANY: $115,000 · OtherUNIVERSIRY OF ALBANYIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $48,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKLINGBERG FAMILY CENTERS: $45,000 · OtherKLINGBERG FAMILY CENTERSAMERICAN SOCIETY OF CRIMINOLOGYINC: $25,000 · Other+29 more: $165,250 · Other+29 moreTHE NAPLES PLAYERS INC: $138,400 · Arts & CultureTHE NAPLES PLAYERS …STUDIO PLAYERS INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSTUDIO PLAYERS INCCENTER FOR THE ARTS OF BONITA SPRINGS INC: $9,500 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR THE ARTS…+1 more: $2,500 · Arts & CulturePENINSULA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF VIRGINIA INC: $60,000 · PhilanthropyPENINSULA …THE PENINSULA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PENINS…NEIGHBORHOOD CARE CENTER INC: $7,000 · PhilanthropyNEIGHBORHO…Birthday Wishes Inc: $5,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $4,000 · PhilanthropySMITHVILLE COMMUNITY COALITION INC: $20,000 · Community ImprovementTHE WAY HOME INC: $14,000 · Housing & ShelterROSIE'S PLACE INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterFeeding America: $17,000 · Food & NutritionBRIDGE OF HEARTS: $15,000 · Human ServicesEvas Foundation Inc: $600 · Human Services
Other$673,250Arts & Culture$175,400Philanthropy$96,000Community Improvement$20,000Housing & Shelter$19,000Food & Nutrition$17,000Human Services$15,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NAPLES PLAYERS INC: $138,400 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetPENINSULA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF VIRGINIA INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF CRIMINOLOGYINC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSTUDIO PLAYERS INC: $25,000 over 7y, 6.3% of budgetSMITHVILLE COMMUNITY COALITION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE PENINSULA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetFeeding America: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE OF HEARTS: $15,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetTHE WAY HOME INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWAYPOINT CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetISLAH: $10,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetCENTER FOR THE ARTS OF BONITA SPRINGS INC: $9,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMOORE HUMANE SOCIETY: $7,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CARE CENTER INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR AUTISM AND NEURODIVERSITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPSC PARTNERS SEEKING A CURE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEDIC ALLY: $4,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetMARCO ISLAND PLAYERS INC: $3,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetNICK STRONG FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNew Hampshire Charitable Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLITHEWOLD INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJINGLED ELVES INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEvas Foundation Inc: $600 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NAPLES PLAYERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CRIMINOLOGYINC ↗
  • Who funds STUDIO PLAYERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SMITHVILLE COMMUNITY COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PENINSULA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE OF HEARTS ↗
  • Who funds THE WAY HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds WAYPOINT CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ISLAH ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR THE ARTS OF BONITA SPRINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds MOORE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR AUTISM AND NEURODIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROGUE VALLEY GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PSC PARTNERS SEEKING A CURE ↗
  • Who funds Birthday Wishes Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDIC ALLY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amica Companies FoundationRI12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amica Companies Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Darald & Julie Libby Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Darald & Julie Libby Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Association for Autism and Neurodiversity Inc: 24% of income from government
  • American Antiquarian Society: 7% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Darald & Julie Libby’s filings →

More from the funding graph