Skip to content

· Private foundation

Daniel P Haerther Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
73
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$460k
Largest
01What it funds
0145% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$7.7MAnimals$2.6MEnvironment$2.1MHuman Services$1.6MSocial Science$495kHousing & Shelter$301kYouth Development$260kCivil Rights$180kOther$0
02FY2024 · 73 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k52 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $143k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+1 grant · $460k
$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHEDD AQUARIUM$460,000
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$166,667
DE LASALLE INSTITUTE$154,650
DEPAUL PREP COLLEGE$148,300
HOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL$148,250
ST PATRICK HIGH SCHOOL$148,100
TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL$148,100
MOTHER MCAULEY HIGH SCHOOL$148,100
BROTHER RICE HIGH SCHOOL$140,895
MORTON ARBORETUM$125,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$100,000
HIGHSIGHT$100,000
CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY$52,500
ARRUPE COLLEGE OF LOYOLA UNIVERSITY$51,000
OFFICE OF HUMAN DIGINITY$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES: $8k → 14%MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES: $8k → 14%MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 75 repeat orgs$189k to everyone else

75 repeat relationships: 45 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

75
40

Total granted

$15M
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+90%

Still filing today

12%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationAnimalsEnvironmentHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +67%
  • TM
    THE MORTON ARBORETUM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +26%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • TP
    TRUSTEE PLEDGES
    one grant, 2022 · $45k
  • HJ
    HIGH JUMPgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +90%
  • DV
    Domestic Violence Outreach
    one grant, 2018 · $19k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
2
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
3
Providence St Mel School

Providence st. mel school is an independent, private school whose mission is to provide a high-quality, college preparatory education to students from preschool through grade 12. the school primarily targets students on chicago's west side.

—
4
Students Run Chicago
Health
5
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
6
The Chicago Scholars Foundation

Chicago scholars is transforming the leadership landscape of our city by resolving the fundamental barriers to success for academically driven, first generation college students from under-resourced communities.

Education
7
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
8
The Latin School of Chicago

It is the school's mission to provide its students with a rigorous and innovative educational program that embraces diversity of people, cultures and ideas. latin inspires its students to lead lives of purpose and excellence.

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
11
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
12
The University of Chicago Charter School Corporation

To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is High Jump; the most unlike its peers is Domestic Violence Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 143 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $1,425,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES INCDE LASALLE INSTITUTE: $793,514 · OtherDE LASALLE INSTITUTEHOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL: $787,164 · OtherHOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOLTRINITY HIGH SCHOOL: $783,499 · OtherTRINITY HIGH SCHOOLST PATRICK HIGH SCHOOL: $725,848 · OtherST PATRICK HIGH SCHOOLBROTHER RICE HIGH SCHOOL: $520,509 · OtherBROTHER RICE HIGH SCHOOLMOTHER MCAULEY HIGH SCHOOL: $488,214 · OtherMOTHER MCAULEY HIGH SCHOOLDEPAUL PREP COLLEGE: $352,920 · OtherCHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY: $327,750 · OtherMOTHER MCCAULEY HIGH SCHOOL: $303,316 · OtherSAN MIGUEL SCHOOLS: $280,000 · Other+122 more: $1,188,574 · Other+122 moreSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $2,589,000 · AnimalsSHEDD AQUARIUM SOC…The Trustees of Princeton University: $1,833,000 · EducationThe Trustees of P…HFS CHICAGO SCHOLARS: $281,500 · EducationHFS CHICAGO SCHOL…LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $255,000 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY…+1 more: $25,000 · EducationTHE MORTON ARBORETUM: $2,135,000 · EnvironmentTHE MORTON ARBO…The Resurrection Project: $301,250 · Housing & ShelterHIGHSIGHT: $177,500 · Community ImprovementMARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesDomestic Violence Outreach: $18,750 · Crime & Legal
Other$7,976,308Animals$2,589,000Education$2,394,500Environment$2,135,000Housing & Shelter$301,250Community Improvement$177,500Human Services$70,000Crime & Legal$18,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $2,589,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTHE MORTON ARBORETUM: $2,135,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $1,833,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Resurrection Project: $301,250 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHFS CHICAGO SCHOLARS: $281,500 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetLawrence Hall: $260,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $255,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHSIGHT: $177,500 over 4y, 8.5% of budgetMARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES INC: $70,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH JUMP: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE MORTON ARBORETUM ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds The Resurrection Project ↗
  • Who funds HFS CHICAGO SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds Lawrence Hall ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds HIGHSIGHT ↗
  • Who funds MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH JUMP ↗
  • Who funds Domestic Violence Outreach ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL21.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · WP & HB White Foundation · Irish Fellowship Educational & Cultural Foundation · The Cuneo Foundation · LINK Unlimited Scholars · Hfs Chicago Scholars · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Daniel P Haerther Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Daniel P Haerther Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Daniel P Haerther Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Daniel P Haerther Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 143 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Daniel P Haerther’s filings →

More from the funding graph