Skip to content

· Private foundation

Daniel Cowles Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$744k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$3.2MHealth$2.9MInternational$1.9MHuman Services$247kArts & Culture$170kCrime & Legal$100kEducation$59kCivil Rights$48kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $833k
  • $250k+1 grant · $744k
$56,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLIANCE$744,000
WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS$200,000
INTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP USA$156,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES$100,000
WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS$96,000
NEIGHBORHOOD CHURCH$96,000
BOWERY MISSION$75,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$56,000
MISSION TO THE WORLD$54,000
FRONTIERS USA$24,000
INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS INC$10,000
EMMAUS JOURNEY$6,000
CHRISTIAN HEALTH SERVICES CORPS$5,000
CUP OF COLD WATER MINISTRIES$4,000
ANCLA DE ESPERANZA$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $12k → 11%PROJECT SWEET PEAS: $4k → 7%ALLIANCE: $744k → 12%ALLIANCE: $614k → 12%ALLIANCE: $600k → 12%ALLIANCE: $528k → 12%DO FOR ONE NYC: $12k → 17%ALLIANCE: $240k → 12%DO FOR ONE NYC: $6k → 17%DO FOR ONE NYC: $6k → 17%AVAIL NYC: $32k → 17%AVAIL NYC: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
SD
IA
PA
CT
RI
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 91% of Daniel Cowles Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 17% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 3%.

Daniel Cowles Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.4M · 39 repeat orgs$387k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
18

Total granted

$8.4M
$126k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+34%

Still filing today

54%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $261k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalAnimalsHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • A
    ALLIANCE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +64% · 72% of their budget
  • WR
    WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $670k · revenue +134%
  • MAP International Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $204k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • CL
    CITY LIGHT CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2022 · $16k
  • LO
    LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue 0%
  • UI
    URBAN IMPACT OF BLACK ROCK INCORPORATEDgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue +48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
World Renew

Compelled by a deep passion for justice and mercy, World Renew joins communities around the world to renew hope, reconcile lives, and restore creation with programs focused on disaster response, community health, economic opportunity, food…

—
3
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services
4
Redeem International

Redeem's mission is to protect widows and orphans from violent abuse and exploitation.

International
5
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
6
Eyewitness Missions
Philanthropy
7
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
8
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
9
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
10
World Reach Inc

World reach is a global, evangelical missions organization serving fields in east africa, central and south america, europe and the u.s. our purpose is to fulfill the the great commission of jesus christ by reaching the world with the…

Religion
11
What Matters Ministries and Missions

The organizations exempt purpose is to rescue orphans and widows, feed the poor, build the local church through ministry, crusades and outreaches and to win souls around the world.

Religion
12
A Jesus Mission

A Jesus Mission creates unique opportunities for individuals or teams to serves as Christian missionaires around the world through traditional evangelism, discipleship training, and outreach.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Justice Mission; the most unlike its peers is Project Sweet Peas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/34
Grantees still filing
25/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALLIANCE: $2,726,000 · Human ServicesALLIANCE+4 more: $87,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD CHURCH: $651,000 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD CHURCHPRISON FELLOWSHIP: $340,000 · OtherPRISON FELLOWSHIPWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $332,000 · OtherWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INCMISSION TO THE WORLD: $210,000 · OtherMISSION TO THE WORLDCHAPEL POINTE: $194,000 · OtherCHAPEL POINTELIGONIER MINISTREIS: $170,000 · OtherLIGONIER MINISTREISINTERNATIONAL CARE MINISTRIES: $154,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL CARE MINISTRIESHOPE ACADAMY OF THE BRONX: $125,000 · Other+24 more: $580,000 · Other+24 moreChristian Herald Association Inc: $915,000 · ReligionChristian Herald Asso…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $180,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $156,000 · ReligionInterVarsity Christia…MIO Frontiers: $105,000 · ReligionMIO FrontiersExpect Hope Inc: $95,000 · ReligionExpect Hope IncSAT-7 NORTH AMERICA: $91,000 · ReligionSAT-7 NORTH AMERICAEVANGELISM RESOURCES INC: $60,000 · Religion+4 more: $88,000 · ReligionWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $670,000 · InternationalWORLD RELIEF CORP…World Hope International Inc: $243,500 · InternationalWorld Hope Intern…MAP International Inc: $204,000 · InternationalMAP International…ECHO Inc: $174,000 · InternationalECHO IncINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $86,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUS…PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $100,000 · Crime & LegalALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $48,000 · Civil RightsCAROLINA WATERFOWL RESCUE INC: $11,000 · AnimalsIndependent Animal Rescue Inc: $6,000 · AnimalsPIEDMONT FARM ANIMAL REFUGE: $6,000 · AnimalsCAROLINA WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENT ER: $5,000 · AnimalsSAFE HAVEN FOR CATS: $5,000 · Animals
Human Services$2,813,000Other$2,756,000Religion$1,690,000International$1,377,500Crime & Legal$100,000Civil Rights$48,000Animals$33,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLIANCE: $2,726,000 over 5y, 72% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc: $915,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $670,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWorld Hope International Inc: $243,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMAP International Inc: $204,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $180,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetECHO Inc: $174,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetExpect Hope Inc: $95,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetSAT-7 NORTH AMERICA: $91,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $86,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEVANGELISM RESOURCES INC: $60,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $48,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAVAIL NYC: $47,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCUP OF COLD WATER MINISTRIES: $41,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetEMMAUS JOURNEY INC: $29,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetDo For One NYC: $24,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetTHE FATHER'S HEART MINISTRIES: $24,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPioneer Bible Translators: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAncla de Esperanza Anchor of Hope Bolivia: $17,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetBLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN IMPACT OF BLACK ROCK INCORPORATED: $12,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCAROLINA WATERFOWL RESCUE INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAUDIO SCRIPTURE MINISTRIES: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIndependent Animal Rescue Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPROMISE OF LIFE NETWORK: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSIGN FRACTURE CARE INTERNATIONAL: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPIEDMONT FARM ANIMAL REFUGE: $6,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCAROLINA WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENT ER: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSAFE HAVEN FOR CATS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetProject Sweet Peas: $4,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Christian Herald Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
  • Who funds World Hope International Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAP International Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds ECHO Inc ↗
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds MIO Frontiers ↗
  • Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Expect Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAT-7 NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds EVANGELISM RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds AVAIL NYC ↗
  • Who funds CUP OF COLD WATER MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds EMMAUS JOURNEY INC ↗
  • Who funds Do For One NYC ↗
  • Who funds THE FATHER'S HEART MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Pioneer Bible Translators ↗
  • Who funds Ancla de Esperanza Anchor of Hope Bolivia ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments FoundationTX12.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Servant Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · Verizon Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Daniel Cowles Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Daniel Cowles Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Daniel Cowles’ filings →

More from the funding graph