Skip to content

· Private foundation

Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation

ORGANIZATION WAS ORGANIZED EXCLUSIVELY FOR CHARITABLE, RELIGIOUS, EDUCATIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC PURPOSES.

$113k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Religion$136kHealth$68kHuman Services$54kCrime & Legal$38kPhilanthropy$4kYouth Development$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kEducation$849Other$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $68k
$2,614
Median grant
6
States reached
$261k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIONHEART CHILDREN'S MINISTRY$13,797
AGAPE PREGNANCY RESOURSE CENTER$12,000
VICTOR AND VALOR VETERAN NP SERVICE$11,000
TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME$11,000
CELEBRATION CHURCH$10,092
Individual grant recipient$10,000
THE KEY2FREE$8,500
SIMPLE SPARROW$8,250
KINGDOM KIDS MINISTRIES$5,135
SERVE SOURCE$5,000
RESET MENTORING$5,000
SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION$3,620
Individual grant recipient$2,614
CIRCLE OF HOPE FOOD PANTRY$2,500
CHILDREN OF THE KING$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%A21 USA INC: $30 → 11%4 KIDS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $1k → 6%TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $11k → 6%TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $11k → 6%TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $8k → 6%TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $7k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$409k · 23 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
24

Total granted

$409k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
0%

Still filing today

43%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsCrime & LegalEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    AGAPE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $67k · revenue +53%
  • WT
    WHITE TOWER HOLDINGS
    4× · 2022–2025 · $46k · revenue +64%
  • TB
    TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $36k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • SI
    ServiceSource Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +17%
  • FC
    FISHNET CARE AND SHARE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Our Rescue

Our rescue works collaboratively with law enforcement agencies worldwide to identify, arrest, and prosecute traffickers. we provide compassionate care for our survivors, beginning with crisis relief and ending months or years later with…

Arts & Culture
2
Prevention Now Inc

Prevention now leverages data and technology to stop human trafficking before it starts.

Human Services
3
Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County

A local united christian organization and ministry dedicated to providing love, hope, respect and a new beginning for the homeless, offering a holistic care program that leads to true lasting healing.

—
4
UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

—
5
A Bridge to Opportunity Inc

To operate a 30 unit permanent and temporary housing facility known as Destiny Village for rental to low income individuals and families who are survivors of domestic violence and or sexual assault

Housing & Shelter
6
The Retreat Home for Children

Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.

Crime & Legal
7
Children's Advocacy Centers of Texas Inc

Children's advocacy centers of texas, inc. (cactx) is the statewide organization for its 70 children's advocacy centers (cac's) across texas. cactx leads efforts, in partnership with investigatory and prosecution agencies, to pursue…

Crime & Legal
8
Miracle Farm Inc

Miracle farm provides an environment for christ to forge young men of integrity who are firmly connected to the sense of security, acceptance, and significance that comes from an identity in christ.

—
9
Texas Council On Family Violence Inc

Texas council on family violence is the only 501(c)3 nonprofit coalition in texas dedicated solely to creating safer communities and freedom from family violence. with a statewide reach and direct local impact, tcfv, with the collective…

Crime & Legal
10
Agape House of Northwest Tennessee

Pregnancy testing, limited obstetrical ultrasounds, sti testing and treatment, and educational programs.

Health
11
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace exists to point people to what matters most: jesus.

Religion
12
Covenant HomeCare

Covenant HomeCare provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Baptist Children's Home Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boys2Men of God dba Children of the King Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
7/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CELEBRATION CHURCH: $89,048 · OtherCELEBRATION CHURCHCHILDREN OF THE KING: $39,077 · OtherCHILDREN OF THE KINGVICTOR AND VALOR VETERAN NP SERVICE: $32,750 · OtherVICTOR AND VALOR VETERAN NP SERVICEIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLIONHEART CHILDREN'S MINISTRY: $13,797 · OtherBoys2Men of God dba Children of the KING Ministries: $12,650 · Other+38 more: $51,989 · Other+38 moreAGAPE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $66,500 · HealthAGAPE PREGNANCY RE…SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $9,340 · HealthSANKARA EYE FOUNDA…+2 more: $295 · HealthWHITE TOWER HOLDINGS: $46,327 · Crime & LegalWHITE TOWER…TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $36,300 · Human ServicesTEXAS BAPTI…RESET MENTORING: $8,000 · Human ServicesRESET MENTO…+2 more: $1,030 · Human ServicesSimple Sparrow: $11,250 · AnimalsTake Me Home Pet Rescue Inc: $762 · AnimalsSERVE SOURCE: $7,000 · Public Safety & DisasterServiceSource Inc: $5,000 · Employment
Other$269,311Health$76,135Crime & Legal$46,327Human Services$45,330Animals$12,012Public Safety & Disaster$7,000Employment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAGAPE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $66,500 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetWHITE TOWER HOLDINGS: $46,327 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetTEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $36,300 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBoys2Men of God dba Children of the KING Ministries: $12,650 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetSimple Sparrow: $11,250 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $9,340 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRESET MENTORING: $8,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSERVE SOURCE: $7,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetServiceSource Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget4Points Family Services: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTake Me Home Pet Rescue Inc: $762 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $641 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $265 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $102 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA21 USA INC: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AGAPE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WHITE TOWER HOLDINGS ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Boys2Men of God dba Children of the KING Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Simple Sparrow ↗
  • Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds RESET MENTORING ↗
  • Who funds SERVE SOURCE ↗
  • Who funds ServiceSource Inc ↗
  • Who funds 4Points Family Services ↗
  • Who funds Take Me Home Pet Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Georgetown Healthcare System IncTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Georgetown Healthcare System Inc · Central Texas Community Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Daniel and Kimberly Chew’s filings →

    More from the funding graph