Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation

ORGANIZATION WAS ORGANIZED EXCLUSIVELY FOR CHARITABLE, RELIGIOUS, EDUCATIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC PURPOSES. THE BUSINESS ACTIVITY FOR SAID ORGANIZATION IS TO CREATE AN ENTITY TO PLACE ASSETS IN THAT WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED TO NON-PROFIT AND CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS. Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not…

$113k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
25
Grants FY2025
27
Organizations funded FY2024
59%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$2,614
Largest grant, FY2025
$13,797
Organizations funded a year
18 to 27
FY2022 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
6
Total assets, FY2025
$261k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 59% of the organizations Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 24% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterEmploymentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving25$113k40%
FY202427$150k59%
FY202324$127k54%
FY202218$71kn/a
78% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Religion$136kHealth$68kHuman Services$54kCrime & Legal$38kPhilanthropy$4kYouth Development$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kEducation$849Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Celebration Church$89,0484n/a
Agape Pregnancy Resource Center$66,50042%
White Tower Holdings$46,32745%
Children of the King$39,0774n/a
Texas Baptist Children's Home Inc$36,30040%
Boys2Men of God dba Children of the KING Ministries$12,65026%
Simple Sparrow$11,25022%
Sankara Eye Foundation USA$9,34030%
Reset Mentoring$8,00031%
Serve Source$7,00021%
Show all 22 grantees
All grantees of Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Celebration Church$89,0484n/a
Agape Pregnancy Resource Center$66,50042%
White Tower Holdings$46,32745%
Children of the King$39,0774n/a
Texas Baptist Children's Home Inc$36,30040%
Boys2Men of God dba Children of the KING Ministries$12,65026%
Simple Sparrow$11,25022%
Sankara Eye Foundation USA$9,34030%
Reset Mentoring$8,00031%
Serve Source$7,00021%
ServiceSource Inc$5,00010%
Mission Church Inc$1,0001n/a
4Points Family Services$1,00010%
Take Me Home Pet Rescue Inc$76210%
Donorschooseorg$64110%
National Multiple Sclerosis Society$26510%
Girl Scouts of Central Texas$20030%
Marriage Today$1151n/a
Central Texas Food Bank Inc$10220%
Safebloodus Inc$601n/a
A21 USA Inc$3010%
Eb Hope Foundation$301n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 35 recipients with no EIN on record ($126k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAgape Pregnancy Resource Center: $66,500 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetWhite Tower Holdings: $46,327 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetTexas Baptist Children's Home Inc: $36,300 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBoys2Men of God dba Children of the KING Ministries: $12,650 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetSimple Sparrow: $11,250 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSankara Eye Foundation USA: $9,340 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetReset Mentoring: $8,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetServe Source: $7,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetServiceSource Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget4Points Family Services: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTake Me Home Pet Rescue Inc: $762 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDonorschooseorg: $641 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Multiple Sclerosis Society: $265 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGirl Scouts of Central Texas: $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $102 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA21 USA Inc: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Georgetown Healthcare System IncTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Georgetown Healthcare System Inc · Central Texas Community Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation with peer funders

About Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation

How much does Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation give?
Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation reported 25 grants totaling $113,224 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 18 and 27 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2024.
What does Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (39%), Health (20%), Human Services (16%).
Who are Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2025: Celebration Church ($89k), Agape Pregnancy Resource Center ($67k), White Tower Holdings ($46k).
Does Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 59% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Georgetown Healthcare System Inc, Central Texas Community Foundation, United Way Worldwide.
Where is Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation based?
Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Daniel and Kimberly Chew’s filings →

More from the funding graph