· Private foundation
Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation
ORGANIZATION WAS ORGANIZED EXCLUSIVELY FOR CHARITABLE, RELIGIOUS, EDUCATIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC PURPOSES.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k20 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE KEY2FREE | $32,827 |
| CELEBRATION CHURCH | $24,053 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| CHILDREN OF THE KING | $13,677 |
| AGAPE PREGNANCY RESOURSE CENTER | $12,000 |
| VICTOR AND VALOR VETERAN NP SERVICE | $11,250 |
| TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME | $11,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,698 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,328 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,184 |
| SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION | $3,120 |
| SIMPLE SPARROW | $3,000 |
| SERVE SOURCE | $2,000 |
| RESET MENTORING | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,010 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- APAGAPE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER3× · 2022–2024 · $55k · revenue +53%
- WTWHITE TOWER HOLDINGS3× · 2022–2024 · $38k · revenue +64%
- TBTEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC3× · 2022–2024 · $25k · revenue +41%
Funded once
- SIServiceSource Incone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +17%
- FCFISHNET CARE AND SHAREone grant, 2022 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our rescue works collaboratively with law enforcement agencies worldwide to identify, arrest, and prosecute traffickers. we provide compassionate care for our survivors, beginning with crisis relief and ending months or years later with…
Prevention now leverages data and technology to stop human trafficking before it starts.
Pregnancy testing, limited obstetrical ultrasounds, sti testing and treatment, and educational programs.
Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…
To operate a 30 unit permanent and temporary housing facility known as Destiny Village for rental to low income individuals and families who are survivors of domestic violence and or sexual assault
A local united christian organization and ministry dedicated to providing love, hope, respect and a new beginning for the homeless, offering a holistic care program that leads to true lasting healing.
Simplifying ministry HR through education, expertise and specialized services so that churches can grow a healthy and thriving staff.
Miracle farm provides an environment for christ to forge young men of integrity who are firmly connected to the sense of security, acceptance, and significance that comes from an identity in christ.
Heartsent Adoptions Inc is a full service domestic and international adoption agency that provides assistance and education to adopting parents and families.
Children's advocacy centers of texas, inc. (cactx) is the statewide organization for its 70 children's advocacy centers (cac's) across texas. cactx leads efforts, in partnership with investigatory and prosecution agencies, to pursue…
Support law enforcement and promote public safety awareness and crime prevention in Fort Worth.
Jones Alternative provides Therapeutic Residential Group Home services to female victims ofsexual trauma, including molestation, rape, incest, and human trafficking, who are underthe care of the Florida Department of Children and Families…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Baptist Children's Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boys2Men of God dba Children of the King Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AGAPE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds WHITE TOWER HOLDINGS ↗
- Who funds TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds Boys2Men of God dba Children of the KING Ministries ↗
- Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds ServiceSource Inc ↗
- Who funds RESET MENTORING ↗
- Who funds Simple Sparrow ↗
- Who funds SERVE SOURCE ↗
- Who funds 4Points Family Services ↗
- Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
- Who funds Marriage Today ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Georgetown Healthcare System Inc · Central Texas Community Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Daniel and Kimberly Chew Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.