How much did DAN GIBBONS TURKEY TROT FOUNDATION NFP grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of DAN GIBBONS TURKEY TROT FOUNDATION NFP’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

—

2022

compassionate

2023

seniorcompassionatefinancial

2024

financialfood pantriescompassionate

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k17 grants · $256k

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$361k

Total assets

Largest grants

UNITED COMMUNITY CONCERNS$20,250
ELMHURSTYORKFIELD FOOD PANTRY$20,000
LOAVES AND FISHES PANTRY$20,000
OUTREACH HOUSE$20,000
PEOPLES RESOURCE CENTER$20,000
WEST SUBURBAN COMMUNITY PANTRY$20,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$15,000
NEIGHBORHOOD FOOD PANTRIES$15,000
DUPAGE PADS$15,000
WAYNE TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY$15,000
HCS FAMILY SERVICES$15,000
ELMHURST WALKIN ASSISTANCE NETWORK$11,000
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCH$10,000
DISCIPLES FOOD PANTRY$10,000
BENSENVILLE WOOD DALE FOOD PANTRY$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $217k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$704k · 13 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +124% since the first grant, against +110% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$704k

$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+124%

+110%

Still filing today

92%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UC
UNITED COMMUNITY CONCERNS
5× · 2020–2024 · $80k · revenue +108%
CC
CATHOLIC CHARITIES
5× · 2020–2024 · $79k · revenue +33%
WS
WEST SUBURBAN COMMUNITY PANTRY
5× · 2020–2024 · $78k · revenue +295%

Funded once

DS
DUPAGE SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCILgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +110%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Illinois Valley Food Pantry

Providing food to needy families in the illinois valley area.

Food & Nutrition

Waushara County Food Pantry Inc

We provide food, household and personal items as available to combat food scarcity and poverty in our community.

Food & Nutrition

Ossining Food Pantry

Feeding the hungry and providing food assistance to needy families.

Human Services

Ravenswood Community Services Inc

Operation of a food pantry/community kitchen for those in need of emergency food.

Human Services

Central Illinois Foodbank Inc

Charitable food distribution.

Food & Nutrition

Eastern Illinois Foodbank

Eastern illinois foodbank exists to alleviate hunger in eastern illinois by providing a reliable source of food for the hungry through cooperation with a network of food pantries and agencies.

Food & Nutrition

Human Needs Food Pantry Inc

The human needs food pantry provides food, clothing, household goods and other services to people in need who live in montclair, nj and other neighboring communities in essex county.

Human Services

New Hope House Northwest

New hope house northwest is a volunteer-driven food pantry dedicated to providing emergency food assistance to individuals and families in need. the pantry serves chicago's far northwest side, norridge, and harwood heights residents,…

Food & Nutrition

Paul's Pantry Inc

A volunteer based food pantry. the organization's major goal is to recover all unsaleable and surplus food items available from the community and distribute that food directly to families and individuals in need.

Food & Nutrition

Oshkosh Area Community Pantry Inc

The oshkosh area community pantry strives to eliminate food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition

Westchester Food Pantry

To provide a reliable source of healthy food assistance for those in need living in the western Cook county communities served by the Westchester Food Pantry.

Human Services

The Pastors Pantry

The pastor's pantry (targeting senior hunger)(the organization) was established to promote and maintain a food pantry for senior adults who are financially unable to obtain adequate food, and to provide food on an emergency basis to…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Suburban Community Pantry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of York Township. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/17

Grantees still filing

17/17

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$352,000Human Services$217,000Food & Nutrition$90,000Housing & Shelter$62,500Philanthropy$30,000Community Improvement$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dupage Community FoundationIL39.2× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dupage Community Foundation · Northern Illinois Food Bank · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Ft Cares Foundation · Community Memorial Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Alben F & Clara G Bates Foundation · George M Eisenberg Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation DAN GIBBONS TURKEY TROT FOUNDATION NFP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FRIENDS OF YORK TOWNSHIP.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 15.0× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 364614086 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FRIENDS OF YORK TOWNSHIP, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 52% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Dan Gibbons Turkey Trot Foundation Nfp?

Find your warmest path to Dan Gibbons Turkey Trot Foundation Nfp through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

DAN GIBBONS TURKEY TROT FOUNDATION NFP

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Dan Gibbons Turkey Trot Foundation Nfp?

More from the funding graph

DAN GIBBONS TURKEY TROT FOUNDATION NFP

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Dan Gibbons Turkey Trot Foundation Nfp?

More from the funding graph