Skip to content

Michigan · Private foundation

Dan and Sherry Bowen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.8M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
24
Grants FY2025
17
Organizations funded FY2024
41%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$2,000,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 21
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$16M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 41% of the organizations Dan and Sherry Bowen Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 85% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving24$3.8M25%
FY202417$2.7M41%
FY202321$1000k33%
FY202217$1.3M53%
FY20218$1.1M38%
FY20205$1.1M40%
FY20194$1.2M75%
FY20182$1.0M50%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$5.0MEducation$3.6MInternational$450kHealth$240kCommunity Improvement$83kArts & Culture$50kHuman Services$45kEmployment$15kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Michigan State University$1,122,0004n/a
Our Shepherds Our Future$750,0003n/a
Aquinas College$275,00060%
Grand Action Foundation 20$166,66620%
Hope College$165,00050%
One World Surgery$150,00030%
HELP Pregnancy Crisis Aid Inc$50,00031%
Grand Rapids Civic Theatre Inc$50,00021%
Grand Rapids Public Schools Foundation$50,00021%
Beer City Dog Biscuits$40,00033%
Show all 21 grantees
All grantees of Dan and Sherry Bowen Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Michigan State University$1,122,0004n/a
Our Shepherds Our Future$750,0003n/a
Aquinas College$275,00060%
Grand Action Foundation 20$166,66620%
Hope College$165,00050%
One World Surgery$150,00030%
HELP Pregnancy Crisis Aid Inc$50,00031%
Grand Rapids Civic Theatre Inc$50,00021%
Grand Rapids Public Schools Foundation$50,00021%
Beer City Dog Biscuits$40,00033%
Artists Creating Together$40,00034%
Brown-Hutcherson Ministries$30,0002n/a
Children's Healing Center$30,00020%
Sisters of the Order of St Dominic of Grand Rapids$25,0004n/a
Catholic Charities West Michigan$22,00030%
Franciscan Renewal Center Inc$20,0002n/a
New Growth Project$20,00042%
Van Andel Institute$10,00020%
Grand Rapids Early Discovery Center$5,00010%
American Heart Association Inc$5,00010%
Camp Blodgett$2,5001n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 21 recipients with no EIN on record ($10M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Dan and Sherry Bowen Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAquinas College: $275,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGrand Action Foundation 20: $166,666 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHope College: $165,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOne World Surgery: $150,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHELP Pregnancy Crisis Aid Inc: $50,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetGrand Rapids Civic Theatre Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGrand Rapids Public Schools Foundation: $50,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBeer City Dog Biscuits: $40,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetArtists Creating Together: $40,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetChildren's Healing Center: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCatholic Charities West Michigan: $22,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew Growth Project: $20,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetVan Andel Institute: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Rapids Early Discovery Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Rapids Community FoundationMI29.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Frey Foundation · Jmj Foundation · The Meijer Foundation · Wolverine World Wide Foundation · Douglas & Maria Devos Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Paradise Foundation · The Meijer Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Dan and Sherry Bowen Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dan and Sherry Bowen Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dan and Sherry Bowen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Dan and Sherry Bowen Foundation

How much does Dan and Sherry Bowen Foundation give?
Dan and Sherry Bowen Foundation reported 24 grants totaling $3,759,665 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 21 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Dan and Sherry Bowen Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (53%), Education (38%), International (5%).
Who are Dan and Sherry Bowen Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Michigan State University ($1.1M), Our Shepherds Our Future ($750k), Aquinas College ($275k).
Does Dan and Sherry Bowen Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 41% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Dan and Sherry Bowen Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Dan and Sherry Bowen Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Grand Rapids Community Foundation, Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation, Frey Foundation.
Where is Dan and Sherry Bowen Foundation based?
Dan and Sherry Bowen Foundation is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dan and Sherry Bowen’s filings →

More from the funding graph