Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dame Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$250k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$367kInternational$306kPhilanthropy$91kCommunity Improvement$85kYouth Development$77kPublic Safety & Disaster$70kHousing & Shelter$4kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $199k
$4,824
Median grant
12
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GHANA MAKE A DIFFERENCE$34,000
CATHERINE CREEK CRISTIAN YOUTH CAMP$30,000
ANGELS FOR ANGELS FOR SANYU$30,000
ACADEMY FOR CREATING ENTERPRISE$25,000
WOMEN'S MICROFINANCE INITIATIVE$20,000
WELLS BRING HOPE$20,000
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY$17,799
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY$12,000
BYU MARRIOTT SCHOOL NATIONAL ADVISO$10,000
EASTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY$9,500
MARSHALL TOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE$6,000
YAYASAN INDONESIA ALUMNI FONDAZATIO$5,426
UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA$4,824
NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WELLS BRING HOPE: $20k → 14%DENVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $141 → 12%WELLS BRING HOPE: $20k → 14%WELLS BRING HOPE: $12k → 14%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER DENVER: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 21% of Dame Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Dame Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 21% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$810k · 24 repeat orgs$199k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
29

Total granted

$810k
$157k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+5%

Still filing today

33%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GM
    Ghana Make a Difference
    6× · 2020–2025 · $168k · revenue +458%
  • WM
    WOMENS MICROFINANCE INITIATIVE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $89k · revenue +40%
  • AF
    Academy for Creating Enterprise
    4× · 2022–2025 · $85k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -40%
  • COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -6%
  • ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +80%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
4
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
5
Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International
6
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
7
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
8
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
9
Firelight Foundation

Firelight supports catalytic community-based organizations in eastern and southern africa that work with their own communities to realize shared visions of sustainable change and true potential for children and youth.

International
10
World Hunger Relief Institute

World hunger relief institute equips people to alleviate hunger through education, research, and sustainable agriculture.

International
11
World Coffee Research

World coffee research unites the global coffee industry to drive science-based agricultural solutions to urgently secure a diverse and sustainable supply of quality coffee today and for generations to come. our mission is to grow, protect,…

International
12
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camfed Usa Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Catherine Creek Christian Youth Camp Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Youth CampsChristian Missionary Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Homeless Services & ShelterFood Pantries & AssistanceSouth Asian Cultural and Sp…Community Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%29%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%62%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%1%35–55yr16%6%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,531

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
18/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY — $90,799 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITYEASTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY — $40,500 · OtherEASTERN OREGON UNIVERSITYIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY — $32,500 · OtherIOWA STATE UNIVERSITYANGELS FOR ANGELS FOR SANYU — $30,000 · OtherANGELS FOR ANGELS FOR SANYUIndividual grant recipient — $24,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBYU MARRIOTT SCHOOL NATIONAL ADVISO — $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $17,579 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IDAHO — $17,500 · OtherUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY — $13,000 · OtherYAYASAN INDONESIA ALUMNI FONDAZATIO — $12,861 · Other+26 more — $81,867 · Other+26 moreGhana Make a Difference — $168,350 · InternationalGhana Make a DifferenceAcademy for Creating Enterprise — $85,000 · InternationalAcademy for Creating EnterpriseWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $50,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $50,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EV…+5 more — $3,325 · InternationalWOMENS MICROFINANCE INITIATIVE — $89,125 · PhilanthropyWOMENS MIC…+2 more — $1,575 · PhilanthropyCATHERINE CREEK CHRISTIAN YOUTH CAMP INC — $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentWELLS BRING HOPE — $52,125 · Human Services+3 more — $2,178 · Human ServicesThe University of Tampa Incorporated — $15,824 · EducationSOUTHERN VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY — $5,500 · EducationThe College of Idaho Inc — $3,000 · EducationSWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE — $2,500 · EducationTHE MALALA FUND — $2,000 · EducationGRAND VIEW UNIVERSITY — $1,500 · EducationALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC — $20,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$381,106International$356,675Philanthropy$90,700Youth Development$75,000Human Services$54,303Education$30,324Public Safety & Disaster$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGhana Make a Difference — $168,350 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetWOMENS MICROFINANCE INITIATIVE — $89,125 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetAcademy for Creating Enterprise — $85,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetCATHERINE CREEK CHRISTIAN YOUTH CAMP INC — $75,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetWELLS BRING HOPE — $52,125 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe University of Tampa Incorporated — $15,824 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe College of Idaho Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MALALA FUND — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN — $1,892 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND VIEW UNIVERSITY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION — $1,040 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION — $1,037 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER DENVER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $825 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $825 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAAGO FOUNDATION INC — $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMFED USA FOUNDATION — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStandUp for Kids — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATE GIRLS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASHOKA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Denver Children's Foundation — $141 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ghana Make a Difference
  • Who funds WOMENS MICROFINANCE INITIATIVE
  • Who funds Academy for Creating Enterprise
  • Who funds CATHERINE CREEK CHRISTIAN YOUTH CAMP INC
  • Who funds WELLS BRING HOPE
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
  • Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC
  • Who funds The University of Tampa Incorporated
  • Who funds SOUTHERN VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds The College of Idaho Inc
  • Who funds SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE
  • Who funds THE MALALA FUND
  • Who funds MALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds CARITAS OF AUSTIN
  • Who funds GRAND VIEW UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL12.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dame Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
  • The University of Tampa Incorporated0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph