Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Dallas Afterschool

DALLAS AFTERSCHOOL levels the playing field for children of all races and economic backgrounds by increasing the quality and availability of afterschool and summer programs in dallas county.

$240k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Youth Development$291kEducation$90kHuman Services$80kCommunity Improvement$50kHousing & Shelter$20kRecreation & Sports$20kPhilanthropy$20kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AFTER SCHOOL ALL STARS$10,000
AMERICAN CARE - MASTERS$10,000
JUNIORS PLAYERS GUILD$10,000
C5 YOUTH FOUNDATION OF TX$10,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF AMERICA$10,000
BIG THOUGHT$10,000
Creative Steps Academy$10,000
READERS 2 LEADERS$10,000
2nd Step DC & Learning Ctr$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$10,000
PROJECT TRANSFORMATION N TX$10,000
VICKERY MEADOWS$10,000
PACE AND ROSS$10,000
El Kinder Bilingual Academy$10,000
UNION CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN CARE - RL THORTON: $10k → 14%AMERICAN CARE - MASTERS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN CARE - MASTERS: $10k → 14%El Kinder Bilingual Academy: $10k → 14%AMERICAN CARE - RL THORTON: $10k → 14%JUBILEE PARK AND COMMUNITY: $10k → 14%JUBILEE PARK AND COMMUNITY: $10k → 14%Aunt Faye Learning Academy: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$451k · 17 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$451k
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+53%

Still filing today

71%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VI
    Vox Invictus Mentoring
    2× · 2020–2021 · $101k · revenue +356%
  • AC
    American Care Foundation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $40k · revenue 0%
  • FR
    Frazier Revitalization Inc
    3× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue -84%

Funded once

  • CF
    CAMP FIRE
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +2%
  • FC
    FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES GROUP RETURNgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +53%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Fay School

See Schedule O. The Fay School ("the School") is a nonsectarian, not-for-profit, co-educational school in which children of diverse talents and backgrounds with strong academic abilities are offered a high-quality education in a secure,…

2
Youth Development Center Inc

Our mission is to inspire, equip, and guide urban youth to live! Our mission is accomplished by providing a free, faith-based, after-school academic program for literacy remediation and character development for low-income students in…

Youth Development
3
Camp Fire West Texas

OUR PROMISE Young people want to shape the world. Camp Fire provides the opportunity to find their Spark, Lift their voice and discover who they are.

Youth Development
4
Girls Incorporated of Greater Houston

The mission of Girls Incorporated of Greater Houston is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart and bold.

Youth Development
5
The YouthVantage Alliance

The youthvantage alliance empowers children and teens to discover their full potential. for 49 years, girls incorporated of tarrant county has fulfilled our mission through life-changing programs and experiences that help girls navigate…

6
Boys & Girls Clubs of Deep East Texas

To provide a place for children to go where they will have supervised activities, arts, crafts, and recreation.

Youth Development
7
Fort Worth Sparc

To strengthen after-school programs through Advocacy, Resources, and Collaboration

Education
8
Boys and Girls Club of McAllen Inc

To enable all young people especially those who need us most to reach their full potential as productive caring responsible citizens.

9
La Academia de Estrellas

To teach our students to be life-long learners, who will actively participate in their own learning, remain engaged in the educational process and show mastery of the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills.

Education
10
Beacon Hill Preparatory Institute

Beacon Hill supplements existing school systems and prepares students and families for success by providing reading and math tutoring, parent education, college preparation, and enrichment activities for students in Southern Dallas, Fort…

Education
11
Trinity Athletics

To use functional fitness to raise a generation of Servant Leaders in North Texas

Youth Development
12
Little Thinkers Inc

Our mission is to prepare the children of our community for the road ahead. We take a whole-child approach that blends personalized care plans with physical play, social development, and academic readiness.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Dallas Inc and the most unlike its peers is Aunt Faye Early Learning Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
3/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Vox Invictus Mentoring — $101,472 · OtherVox Invictus MentoringNV KIDS ACADEMY — $20,000 · OtherNV KIDS ACADEMYUNION CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $20,000 · OtherUNION CHRISTIAN ACADEMYPACE AND ROSS LEARNING CENTER — $20,000 · OtherPACE AND ROSS LEARNING CENTERAFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS — $20,000 · OtherAFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARSDOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT COMPANY OF DENISON TEX — $20,000 · OtherDOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT COMPANY OF DENISON TEXPOINT OF LIGHT CHURCH INC — $10,000 · OtherCreative Steps Academy — $10,000 · Other2nd Step DC & Learning Ctr — $10,000 · OtherKALEIDOSCOPE CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $10,000 · OtherCAMP FIRE — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP FIREForerunner Mentoring — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentForerunner MentoringGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXASREADERS 2 LEADERS — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentREADERS 2 LEADERSPROJECT TRANSFORMATION NORTH TEXAS — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT TRANSFORMATION NORTH TEX…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DA…C5 Youth Foundation of Texas Inc — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentC5 Youth Foundation of Texas IncAmerican Care Foundation — $40,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Care F…JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION — $20,000 · Human ServicesJUBILEE PARK & …EL KINDER BLINGUAL ACADEMY INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesEL KINDER BLING…Aunt Faye Early Learning Academy — $10,000 · Human ServicesAunt Faye Early…Frazier Revitalization Inc — $30,000 · Community ImprovementVICKERY MEADOW YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyBIG THOUGHT — $20,000 · Arts & CultureFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES GROUP RETURN — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterSpida Inc Braswell Child Development Center — $10,000 · Education
Other$241,472Youth Development$170,000Human Services$80,000Community Improvement$30,000Philanthropy$20,000Arts & Culture$20,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Education$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAMP FIRE — $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAmerican Care Foundation — $40,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetFrazier Revitalization Inc — $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetForerunner Mentoring — $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVICKERY MEADOW YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetREADERS 2 LEADERS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPROJECT TRANSFORMATION NORTH TEXAS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBIG THOUGHT — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES GROUP RETURN — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetC5 Youth Foundation of Texas Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSpida Inc Braswell Child Development Center — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEL KINDER BLINGUAL ACADEMY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetAunt Faye Early Learning Academy — $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Metropolitan Dallas IncTX19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Elizabeth Toon Charities · Byrne Family Foundation Trust · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dallas Afterschool funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph