Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dahl Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$640
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$250
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Animals$1kHealth$797Human Services$671Public Benefit$546Education$540International$218Arts & Culture$170Science & Tech$150Other$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$120
Median grant
4
States reached
$24k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEGACY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$250
CAPTAIN SAX FOUNDATION$130
THE TWIN TO TWIN TRANSFUSION SYNDROME FOUNDATION$120
COMO FRIENDS$100
SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC$40
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $653) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $226 → 9%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $177 → 11%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $150 → 11%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $100 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
OH
PA
CA
NC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3k · 6 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +97% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$3k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+37%

Still filing today

50%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $290 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsPublic BenefitInternationalHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    COMO FRIENDS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1k · revenue +97%
  • LEASHES OF VALOR
    3× · 2020–2022 · $546 · revenue +184%
  • KT
    KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $427 · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • 4P
    4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $226 · revenue +13%
  • SF
    SEMPER FI COMMUNITY TASK FORCE
    one grant, 2023 · $218 · revenue -13%
  • DD
    DYLAN'S DOGS FOR DIABETES
    one grant, 2018 · $205
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Companions for Heroes

To champion public awareness of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and challenges confronting our countrys heroes and rally support for shelter animal adoption by connecting heroes and companions.

Human Services
2
Dogs to Dog Tags Inc

D2dt creates an opportunity to save at risk, rescued, or donated dogs, train them, and place them with deserving service members who have been diagnosed with post combat stress and anxiety. the purpose is to provide the veteran, at no…

Public Benefit
3
Pets for Patriots Inc

The organization's mission is to transform the lives of veterans by helping them save an at risk shelter dog or cat, and to end all animal homelessness in the us and enrich the lives of men and women who serve, and have served our country.…

Animals
4
Fidos for Freedom Inc

To provide quality trained assistance dogs for mobility-challenged individuals, hearing-impaired individuals and veterans with combat related ptsd.

—
5
Duty First Assistance Dogs

Providing service dogs to veterans and first responders

Human Services
6
Pets for Vets Inc

Pets for Vets enriches the lives of veterans by creating a life-changing Super Bond with expertly selected and trained shelter or rescue pets. It provides ongoing expert support to ensure a reciprocal and thriving partnership at no cost to…

Public Benefit
7
Happy Tails Rescue Foundation

Happy tails rescue foundation, founded in 2005, is a 501(c)(3) non- profit organization dedicated to rescuing homeless and abandoned animals. by working with committed volunteers, foster homes, and trainers, we are able to rescue dogs and…

—
8
Operation At Ease Inc

Takes dogs from shelters, pairs them with deserving veterans and first responders and provides a free guided training program for post traumatic stress and light mobility service dogs.

Animals
9
Twin Cities Pet Rescue

Our mission is to rescue abandoned, homeless, abused, neglected and otherwise unwanted dogs and cats, with the ultimate goal of finding each one a stable and loving forever home

Animals
10
Service Dogs for Veterans

To complement traditional treatment for veterans with ptsd, tbi, and mst by training them and a dog to become highly effective service dog teams

Public Benefit
11
Fallen Soldiers March

Providing highly trained service dogs for wounded united states military veterans in need of assistance

—
12
Mutts With a Mission

Our mission is to train and provide service dogs for veteran and wounded warriors and to raise public awareness.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 4 Paws for Ability Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dylan's Dogs for Diabetes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEGACY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $500 · OtherLEGACY ELEMENTARY SCHOOLKEISTER FOR A CURE: $472 · OtherKEISTER FOR A CURED CUBED: $320 · OtherD CUBEDMADISON COUNTY FOSTER CHILDRENS ALLIANCE: $204 · OtherMADISON COUNTY FOSTER CHILDRENS ALLIANCETALONS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $150 · OtherTALONS RESEARCH FOUNDATIONCAPTAIN SAX FOUNDATION: $130 · OtherCAPTAIN SAX FOUNDATIONTHE TWIN TO TWIN TRANSFUSION SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $120 · OtherTHE TWIN TO TWIN TRANSFUSION SYNDROME FOUNDATIO…+3 more: $120 · Other+3 moreCOMO FRIENDS: $1,092 · AnimalsCOMO FRIENDSKIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $427 · Human ServicesKIDS TO LOVE FO…4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $226 · Human Services4 PAWS FOR ABIL…LEASHES OF VALOR: $546 · Public BenefitLEASHES OF V…SEMPER FI COMMUNITY TASK FORCE: $218 · InternationalDYLAN'S DOGS FOR DIABETES: $205 · HealthHabitat for Humanity of the River Valley: $100 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,016Animals$1,092Human Services$653Public Benefit$546International$218Health$205Housing & Shelter$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMO FRIENDS: $1,092 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLEASHES OF VALOR: $546 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $427 over 3y, 0.0% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $226 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI COMMUNITY TASK FORCE: $218 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TWIN TO TWIN TRANSFUSION SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $120 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of the River Valley: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater HuntsvilleAL13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Huntsville · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dahl Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dahl Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dahl Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Dahl Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dahl Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph