Skip to content

· Private foundation

Daftuar Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$833k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$7.2MEducation$7.1MScience & Tech$2.6MFood & Nutrition$150kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kSocial Science$34kArts & Culture$2kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $48k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $628k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.7M
$100,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$105M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$833,333
GREENWICH ACADEMY INC$600,000
MAYO CLINIC$250,000
PALO ALTO VETERANS INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH$125,000
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY$125,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$125,000
EXPII INC$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHARITE BERLIN$96,580
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER$56,356
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON$48,094
LUDWIG BOLTZMANN INSTITUTE FOR TRAUMATOLOGY$9,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC WEB DEPOSITORY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 83% of grant dollars ($14M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 17% that went abroad ($3.0M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 44% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $300k → 15%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $833k → 8%MAYO CLINIC: $250k → 9%EXPII INC: $100k → 11%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY - OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION: $126k → 22%PALO ALTO VETERANS INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH: $125k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC WEB DEPOSITORY: $132k → 12%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $125k → 14%KLINIKUM ERNST VON BERGMANN GEMEINNUTZIGE GMBH: $156k → 14%CITY HARVEST: $150k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER: $124k → 11%UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $83k → 14%TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $134k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA: $140k → 13%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $125k → 21%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $134k → 14%BENAROYA RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $120k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $196k → 14%THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $97k → 22%LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $125k → 19%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $100k → 23%UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG: $136k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $808k → 15%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE: $833k → 8%MASSACHUSSETS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $83k → 16%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY - OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION: $124k → 22%LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $125k → 12%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $125k → 14%KLINIKUM ERNST VON BERGMANN GEMEINNUTZIGE GMBH: $148k → 14%THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $100k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER: $121k → 11%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $125k → 21%GREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $600k → 9%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $89k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $181k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $500k → 15%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $833k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC WEB DEPOSITORY: $118k → 12%THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $100k → 17%GREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $600k → 9%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $354k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $147k → 14%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $833k → 8%THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $100k → 17%GREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $600k → 9%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE: $833k → 8%GREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $600k → 9%GREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $500k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
LA
GA
TX

Beyond the US: 17% of all-years giving ($3.0M)

8 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Germany$726k · 8 grants
Switzerland$710k · 5 grants
Australia$621k · 6 grants
United Kingdom$551k · 5 grants
Italy$140k · 1 grant
Belgium$125k · 1 grant
Austria$122k · 1 grant
Canada$8k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Daftuar Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Daftuar Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 17% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 27 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
28

Total granted

$13M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+46%

Still filing today

41%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $386k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationScience & TechCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GA
    GREENWICH ACADEMY INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2.9M · revenue +8%
  • University of Arizona Foundation
    2× · 2017–2018 · $800k · revenue +109%
  • VU
    Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    3× · 2017–2023 · $578k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • CITY HARVEST INC
    one grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue +3%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA
    one grant, 2023 · $140k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG
    one grant, 2023 · $136k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
6
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
7
Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…

Health
8
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
9
Van Andel Research Institute

Medical research organization van andel research institute is an independent biomedical research organization committed to improving the health and enhancing the lives of current and future generations.

Health
10
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
11
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
12
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Microcirculatory Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
20/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $2,500,000 · OtherPRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $922,506 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAUNIVERSITY OF ZURICH: $579,065 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ZURICHUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA: $430,429 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER: $366,195 · OtherST GEORGES HOSPITAL MEDICAL SCHOOL: $306,249 · OtherKLINIKUM ERNST VON BERGMANN GEMEINNUTZIGE GMBH: $304,660 · Other+35 more: $3,493,303 · Other+35 moreGREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $2,900,000 · EducationGREENWICH ACADEMY INCPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,666,667 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $800,000 · EducationUniversity of Arizona FoundationUniversity of Chicago: $523,814 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $300,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $260,000 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $250,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $250,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationVanderbilt University Medical Center: $577,705 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $250,000 · HealthPALO ALTO VETERANS INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH: $125,000 · HealthBENAROYA RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT VIRGINIA: $119,851 · HealthGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $71,390 · Health+4 more: $23,500 · HealthCITY HARVEST INC: $150,000 · Food & NutritionGORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES INC: $20,430 · Science & TechKEYSTONE SYMPOSIA ON MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY: $10,000 · Science & TechJUNIOR LEAGUE OF GREENWICH CONN INC: $2,000 · Community Improvement
Other$8,902,407Education$6,955,481Health$1,167,446Food & Nutrition$150,000Science & Tech$30,430Community Improvement$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $2,900,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,666,667 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $800,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $577,705 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $523,814 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $260,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $250,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $250,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPALO ALTO VETERANS INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH: $125,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBENAROYA RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT VIRGINIA: $119,851 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $71,390 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $34,454 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES INC: $20,430 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMICROCIRCULATORY SOCIETY INC: $12,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetKEYSTONE SYMPOSIA ON MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WHITBY SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAST CELL DISEASE SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF GREENWICH CONN INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC: $894 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREENWICH ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds PALO ALTO VETERANS INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds BENAROYA RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT VIRGINIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC9.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Daftuar Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Daftuar Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 39%
  • Health Resources in Action Inc: 39% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Daftuar Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Daftuar Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Daftuar Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph