Skip to content
D a Hamel Family Charitable Trust Xxxxx5007 at a glance

· Private foundation

D a Hamel Family Charitable Trust Xxxxx5007

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$98k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$12MHealth$470kPhilanthropy$295kArts & Culture$173kYouth Development$170kHuman Services$75kFood & Nutrition$64kEnvironment$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOST TREE VILLAGE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$20,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE HISTORICAL SOCIETY$8,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
WIGGIN MEMORIAL LIBRARY$5,000
MALTZ JUPITER THEATER$5,000
WOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT$5,000
LASELL COLLEGE$5,000
THE BARNSTORMERS$5,000
LOST TREE CHAPEL INC$5,000
TUFTONBORO FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION$5,000
TUFTONBRO SCHOLARSHIP FUND$5,000
CROSS ROADS HOUSE INC$5,000
THE TURTLE HOSPITAL$5,000
SQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER$5,000
END OF 68 HOURS OF HUNGER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT: $5k → 5%WOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT: $5k → 5%WOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT: $5k → 5%WOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT: $5k → 5%WOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT: $5k → 5%Child Advocacy Center of Carroll County: $5k → 9%Child Advocacy Center of Carroll County: $5k → 9%Child Advocacy Center of Carroll County: $5k → 9%BALD PEAK COMMUNITY FUND INC: $10k → 9%BALD PEAK COMMUNITY FUND INC: $10k → 9%BALD PEAK COMMUNITY FUND INC: $10k → 9%BALD PEAK COMMUNITY FUND INC: $10k → 9%BALD PEAK COMMUNITY FUND INC: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
NY
MA
OH
PA
AZ
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 36 repeat orgs$124k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
16

Total granted

$13M
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+67%

Still filing today

67%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
    3× · 2020–2022 · $11M · revenue +28%
  • LT
    Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation
    5× · 2020–2025 · $250k · revenue +45%
  • KY
    KINGSWOOD YOUTH CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $90k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporationgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $53k · revenue +76%
  • HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGESgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +74%
  • NB
    NORTH BENNET ST SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Piscataquog Land Conservancy

The Piscataquog Land Conservancy is a nonprofit land conservation organization founded in 1970. Its purpose is to conserve the natural and scenic environment of the Piscataquog, Souhegan and Nashua River watershed communities of southern…

—
2
Abbe Museum

To illuminate and advance greater understanding of and support for Wabanaki Nations' heritage, living cultures, and homelands.

Arts & Culture
3
Newburyport Maritime Society Inc

To protect, preserve and interpret the martime heritage of the lower Merrimack Valley region and how it relates to American History

Arts & Culture
4
Kennebunk Land Trust

Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.

Environment
5
Upper Saco Valley Land Trust

The Organization works with local landowners to permanently protect natural land and waters that define its community and enrich the quality of life by purchasing, managing, negotiating and developing conservations easements in the Upper…

Food & Nutrition
6
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Islesboro Islands Trust

The mission of Islesboro Islands Trust is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all residents as to the value of the island's natural ecosystems, and act as an environmental advocate on…

Philanthropy
8
Somerset Woods Trustees

To conserve lands with significant ecological or cultural resources and manage them in a sustainable way for public benefit.

Environment
9
Wilton Land Conservation Trust

Protecting, enhancing and conserving open spaces encompassing meadows, woodlands, wetlands, and waterways in the town of wilton ct.

Environment
10
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
11
Midcoast Conservancy

The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.

Environment
12
Loon Echo Land Trust Inc

Loon Echo Land Trust protects land in the northern Sebago Lake region to conserve its natural resources and character for future generations.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Hampshire Historical Society; the most unlike its peers is The Child Advocacy Center of Carroll County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/38
Grantees still filing
27/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $11,300,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED+4 more: $175,439 · EducationLost Tree Village Charitable Foundation: $250,000 · OtherLost Tree…CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $210,000 · OtherCLEVELAND…WARA - YOUTH ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $80,000 · OtherWARA - YO…TUFTONBRO SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $45,000 · OtherBASCOM PALMER EYE INSTITUTE ALUMNI: $44,000 · OtherWIGGIN MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $40,000 · OtherWOLFEBORO AREA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $47,000 · Other+26 more: $325,000 · Other+26 moreNew Hampshire Historical Society: $48,000 · Arts & CultureMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureThe Society of the Four Arts Inc: $19,000 · Arts & CultureGREAT WATERS MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $4,000 · Arts & CultureChildren's Hospital Corporation: $53,000 · HealthHuggins Hospital: $43,000 · HealthINDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · HealthKINGSWOOD YOUTH CENTER INC: $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentBALD PEAK COMMUNITY FUND: $50,000 · Human ServicesWOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT: $25,000 · Human ServicesThe Child Advocacy Center of Carroll County: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · PhilanthropyJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $42,000 · Philanthropy
Education$11,475,439Other$1,041,000Arts & Culture$116,000Health$102,000Youth Development$90,000Human Services$90,000Philanthropy$87,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $11,300,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetLost Tree Village Charitable Foundation: $250,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetKINGSWOOD YOUTH CENTER INC: $90,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetLASELL UNIVERSITY: $85,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $53,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALD PEAK COMMUNITY FUND: $50,000 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetNew Hampshire Historical Society: $48,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetWOLFEBORO AREA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $47,000 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetTHE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetHuggins Hospital: $43,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $42,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT EDWARD'S SCHOOL INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCentral New Hampshire VNA & Hospice: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LIBBY MUSEUM INC: $28,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetWOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT: $25,000 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetSQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BARNSTORMERS: $23,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetTUFTONBORO FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC: $21,000 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetCross Roads House Inc: $19,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Society of the Four Arts Inc: $19,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEND 68 HOURS OF HUNGER: $17,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGREAT WATERS MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Child Advocacy Center of Carroll County: $15,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetHOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES: $10,439 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLoon Preservation Committee: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFriends of Abenaki Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetLakes Region Conservation Trust: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYORK LAND TRUST: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWOLFEBORO AREA RECREATION ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF MACARTHUR BEACH STATE PARK INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HENRY MORRISON FLAGLER MUSEUM INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPortland Museum of Art: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCurrier Gallery of Art: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation ↗
  • Who funds KINGSWOOD YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LASELL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds BALD PEAK COMMUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds New Hampshire Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds WOLFEBORO AREA MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Huggins Hospital ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SAINT EDWARD'S SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Central New Hampshire VNA & Hospice ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LIBBY MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT ↗
  • Who funds SQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE BARNSTORMERS ↗
  • Who funds TUFTONBORO FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Cross Roads House Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Society of the Four Arts Inc ↗
  • Who funds END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER ↗
  • Who funds GREAT WATERS MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Child Advocacy Center of Carroll County ↗
  • Who funds HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Loon Preservation Committee ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…The Booth FoundationThe Ayco Charitable F…Richard E & Nancy P M…Ibm International Fou…Fidelity FoundationThe Olcott Family Fou…Henry F Hurlburt III …Hilltop Foundation IncThe Beach FoundationThe Dinovi Family Fou…The Pamela and Lauren…
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH41.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Booth Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Richard E & Nancy P Marriott Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · The Olcott Family Foundation Inc · Henry F Hurlburt III Charitable Trust Debra Golder Trustee · Hilltop Foundation Inc · The Beach Foundation · The Dinovi Family Foundation · The Pamela and Laurence Tarica Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization D a Hamel Family Charitable Trust Xxxxx5007 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from D a Hamel Family Charitable Trust Xxxxx5007. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Lasell University: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on D a Hamel Family Charitable Trust Xxxxx5007’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home