Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Olcott Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$89k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Arts & Culture$399kPhilanthropy$167kEducation$156kHealth$107kRecreation & Sports$11kHousing & Shelter$10kInternational$2kYouth Development$250Other$0
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k5 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
$7,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$503k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DRAMATISTS GUILD FUND$25,000
GREAT WATERS MUSIC FESTIVAL$20,000
GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$15,000
LOOMIS CHAFFEE ANNUAL FUND$10,000
FUTURE IN SIGHT$7,000
CON VIVO MUSIC$5,000
CASTLE PRESERVATION SOCIETY$2,850
CHANTICLEER$2,500
GRANITE STATE ADAPTIVE$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TOUCH FOUNDATION: $1k → 20%TOUCH FOUNDATION: $500 → 20%THE KEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $250 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$541k · 16 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
12

Total granted

$541k
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+84%

Still filing today

56%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TD
    THE DRAMATISTS GUILD FUND INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $200k · revenue +2%
  • GW
    GREAT WATERS MUSIC FESTIVAL INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $114k · revenue +333%
  • GR
    GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $45k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • GF
    GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • OR
    OCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +16%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $11k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
2
Land Conservancy of Ridgefield Inc

The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…

Environment
3
Alaska Whale Foundation

Alaska Whale Foundation is dedicated to marine mammal conservation through research monitoring and education.

Environment
4
Wilton Land Conservation Trust

Protecting, enhancing and conserving open spaces encompassing meadows, woodlands, wetlands, and waterways in the town of wilton ct.

Environment
5
Kennebunk Land Trust

Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.

Environment
6
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment
7
Georges River Land Trust

The Georges River Land Trust's mission is to conserve the ecosystems and traditional heritage of the Georges River Watershed Region through permanent land protection, stewardship, education, and outdoor experiences.

Environment
8
Lowell Observatory Foundation

To sustain and enhance lowell observatory's mission of research and education by generating perpetual financial support.

Science & Tech
9
The Great Pond Foundation Inc

Our mission is to cultivate the resilience of our coastal pond ecosystems through science, collaboration, and education.

Environment
10
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
11
Bourne Conservation Trust

To provide the general public with woodland trails through a wildlife sanctuary in a natural state for their appreciation and enjoyment

Environment
12
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ocean Reef Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%50%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%60%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%30%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
5%
1/22
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,543

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
17/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE DRAMATISTS GUILD FUND INC — $200,409 · Arts & CultureTHE DRAMATISTS GUILD FUND INCGREAT WATERS MUSIC FESTIVAL INC — $113,809 · Arts & CultureGREAT WATERS MUSIC FESTIVAL INCOCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureCASTLE PRESERVATION SOCIETY — $14,400 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $2,600 · Arts & CultureLOOMIS CHAFFEE ANNUAL FUND — $65,000 · OtherLOOMIS CHAFFEE ANNUAL FU…MADSONIAN MUSEUM — $34,200 · OtherMADSONIAN MUSEUMGLAUCOMA FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherGLAUCOMA FOUNDATIONNew Hampshire Association for the Blind D/B/A Future in Sight — $15,000 · OtherNew Hampshire Associatio…Individual grant recipient — $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…NH BOAT MUSEUM — $10,250 · OtherNH BOAT MUSEUMCON VIVO MUSIC INC — $8,200 · Other+11 more — $15,450 · Other+11 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $150,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTE…OCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $100,578 · PhilanthropyOCEAN REEF CO…GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $45,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $11,500 · HealthBaptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc — $10,000 · HealthFamilies in Transition — $9,500 · Housing & ShelterGRANITE STATE ADAPTIVE — $6,200 · Youth Development
Arts & Culture$346,218Other$184,100Education$150,000Philanthropy$100,578Health$66,500Housing & Shelter$9,500Youth Development$6,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE DRAMATISTS GUILD FUND INC — $200,409 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT WATERS MUSIC FESTIVAL INC — $113,809 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $100,578 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNew Hampshire Association for the Blind D/B/A Future in Sight — $15,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetOCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCASTLE PRESERVATION SOCIETY — $14,400 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $11,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBaptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamilies in Transition — $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGRANITE STATE ADAPTIVE — $6,200 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWOLFEBORO AREA RECREATION ASSOCIATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO CHANTICLEER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOUCH HEALTH INC — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Wright Museum of World War II — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY20.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Lovett-Woodsum Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · D a Hamel Family Charitable Trust Xxxxx5007 · The Beach Foundation · The Booth Foundation · The Hajim Family Foundation · The Penates Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Olcott Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph