· Private foundation
D a Hamel Family Charitable Trust Xxxxx5007
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $78k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOST TREE VILLAGE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| NEW HAMPSHIRE HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $8,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| WOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT | $5,000 |
| THE TURTLE HOSPITAL | $5,000 |
| SQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER | $5,000 |
| LOON PERSERVATION COMMITTEE | $5,000 |
| LASELL COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| THE BARNSTORMERS | $5,000 |
| CROSS ROADS HOUSE INC | $5,000 |
| TUFTONBORO FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| END OF 68 HOURS OF HUNGER | $5,000 |
| LOST TREE CHAPEL INC | $5,000 |
| TUFTONBRO SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $5,000 |
| MALTZ JUPITER THEATER | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
36 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED3× · 2020–2022 · $11M · revenue +28%- LTLost Tree Village Charitable Foundation5× · 2020–2025 · $250k · revenue +45%
- KYKINGSWOOD YOUTH CENTER INC5× · 2020–2024 · $90k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- CHChildren's Hospital Corporationgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $53k · revenue +55%
HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGESgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +74%- NBNORTH BENNET ST SCHOOLone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Piscataquog Land Conservancy is a nonprofit land conservation organization founded in 1970. Its purpose is to conserve the natural and scenic environment of the Piscataquog, Souhegan and Nashua River watershed communities of southern…
To illuminate and advance greater understanding of and support for Wabanaki Nations' heritage, living cultures, and homelands.
To protect, preserve and interpret the martime heritage of the lower Merrimack Valley region and how it relates to American History
Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.
The Organization works with local landowners to permanently protect natural land and waters that define its community and enrich the quality of life by purchasing, managing, negotiating and developing conservations easements in the Upper…
The mission of Islesboro Islands Trust is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all residents as to the value of the island's natural ecosystems, and act as an environmental advocate on…
To conserve lands with significant ecological or cultural resources and manage them in a sustainable way for public benefit.
Protecting, enhancing and conserving open spaces encompassing meadows, woodlands, wetlands, and waterways in the town of wilton ct.
The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…
The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.
Loon Echo Land Trust protects land in the northern Sebago Lake region to conserve its natural resources and character for future generations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Hampshire Historical Society and the most unlike its peers is The Child Advocacy Center of Carroll County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds KINGSWOOD YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LASELL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds BALD PEAK COMMUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Historical Society ↗
- Who funds WOLFEBORO AREA MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds THE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Huggins Hospital ↗
- Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SAINT EDWARD'S SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Central New Hampshire VNA & Hospice ↗
- Who funds MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LIBBY MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds SQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds WOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT ↗
- Who funds THE BARNSTORMERS ↗
- Who funds TUFTONBORO FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Society of the Four Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds Cross Roads House Inc ↗
- Who funds END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER ↗
- Who funds GREAT WATERS MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds The Child Advocacy Center of Carroll County ↗
- Who funds HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES ↗
- Who funds INDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Loon Preservation Committee ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Booth Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Richard E & Nancy P Marriott Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · The Olcott Family Foundation Inc · Henry F Hurlburt III Charitable Trust Debra Golder Trustee · Hilltop Foundation Inc · The Beach Foundation · The Dinovi Family Foundation · The Pamela and Laurence Tarica Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization D a Hamel Family Charitable Trust Xxxxx5007 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
- Lasell University — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.