Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cynthia M Reed Inc Heart & Solle Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$34kHealth$14kFood & Nutrition$3kHuman Services$760Religion$40Arts & Culture$20Other$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,830
Median grant
3
States reached
$59k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Postpartum Support International$1,840
Hope 4 Utah$1,830
Brain and Behavior Research Foundat$1,275
Espere Community Counseling Center$1,160
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $20) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Artisans 4 Hope: $20 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
CA
UT
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Cynthia M Reed Inc Heart & Solle Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 86% of the giving stays in UT; by stated purpose, 47%.

Cynthia M Reed Inc Heart & Solle Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 39% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wondherful Inc

Organizations main purpose is to encourage people suffering from anxiety/depression to choose life and not give up through the distribution of lifeboxes.

Health
2
Hope4vets
Housing & Shelter
3
Q4Impact
Religion
4
4 Us

4us equips pregnancy centers with the tools, technology, and talent to save more lives by providing ultrasound machines free to these centers to help women and families chose life.

Philanthropy
5
WAR4LIFE We Are Ready 4 Life

Suicide prevention by improving the quality of life of individuals and families that dwell in destitute regions or conditions. we provide hope where the "hopeless" are by exhibiting actions over words, making it, one community at a time.

—
6
Alliance for Hope International

To create pathways to hope for women, children, and men who are survivors of domestic violence and related sexual assault and child abuse through collaborative, integrative centers, teams and initiatives.

Philanthropy
7
Aid for Life International Inc

Provide services to in-transit migrant populations throughout their journeys and assist with resettlement processes of asylum seekers and migrants.

Health
8
Be Hope International
Religion
9
Hope for Her International

Hope for Her International is dedicated to advocating for a just and peaceful world with a profound emphasis on the rights of women and girls. Our mission is to build a supportive community, foster social entrepreneurship, eradicate…

Human Services
10
Heartbeat International Inc

Heartbeat international's life-saving mission is to reach and rescue as many lives as possible, around the world, through an effective network of life-affirming pregnancy help to renew communities for life.

—
11
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
12
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Postpartum Support International; the most unlike its peers is Village Book Builders Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VILLAGE BOOK BUILDERS INC: $34,050 · EducationVILLAGE BOOK BUILDERS INCHope Squad: $2,097 · OtherHope SquadPOSTPARTUM SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL: $1,840 · OtherPOSTPARTUM SUPPOR…Brain and Behavior Research Foundat: $1,275 · OtherBrain and Behavio…Espere Community Counseling Center: $1,160 · OtherEspere Community …Espere: $1,000 · OtherEspereIndividual grant recipient: $440 · OtherIndividual grant …+4 more: $80 · OtherHOPE4UTAH: $6,207 · HealthHOPE4UTAHHEROES IN TRANSITION INC: $720 · HealthHEROES IN TRANS…+1 more: $20 · Health412 FOOD RESCUE INC: $3,060 · Food & NutritionDARE FOR MORE MINISTRIES INC: $40 · ReligionARTISANS4HOPE: $20 · Human ServicesWARHAWK AIR MUSEUM INC: $20 · Arts & Culture
Education$34,050Other$7,892Health$6,947Food & Nutrition$3,060Religion$40Human Services$20Arts & Culture$20

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVILLAGE BOOK BUILDERS INC: $34,050 over 2y, 12% of budgetHOPE4UTAH: $6,207 over 3y, 0.5% of budget412 FOOD RESCUE INC: $3,060 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOSTPARTUM SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL: $1,840 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEROES IN TRANSITION INC: $720 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDARE FOR MORE MINISTRIES INC: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTISANS4HOPE: $20 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWARHAWK AIR MUSEUM INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cynthia M Reed Inc Heart & Solle Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cynthia M Reed Inc Heart & Solle Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 41%
  • Postpartum Support International: 41% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cynthia M Reed Inc Heart & Solle Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Cynthia M Reed Inc Heart & Solle Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cynthia M Reed Inc Heart & Solle’s filings →

More from the funding graph