Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Cynthia a Niekamp Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Youth Development$60kCrime & Legal$40kHealth$20kHuman Services$20kReligion$10k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$918k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN DETROIT$20,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN TWIN CITIES$15,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN CHICAGO$15,000
NAT ALLIANCE ON MENTAL HEALTH$10,000
IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESEARCH CTR$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESEARCH CTR: $10k → 10%TRIPS FOR KIDS CHARLOTTE: $10k → 10%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN CHICAGO: $15k → 14%THE CRADLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
CA
VA
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Children - Philadelphia

Friends of the children philadelphia has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships and professional mentors 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Education
2
Friends of the Children-Portland

Friends - portland commits to standing alongside our community's youth as they work to overcome barriers to their success. each child receives 1:1 support and guidance from a salaried, professional mentor (called a friend), from…

Youth Development
3
Fotc - Los Angeles

Friends of the children commits to standing alongside our community's youth as they work to overcome barriers to their success. each child receives 1:1 support and guidance from a salaried, professional mentor (called a friend), from…

Education
4
Friends of the Children - Seattle

Friends of the children - seattle has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what. youth in the friends…

Youth Development
5
Friends of the Children- New York

Friends of the children - new york has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Crime & Legal
6
Friends of the Children

Impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with paid professional mentors 12+ years, no matter what.

Youth Development
7
Friends of the Children - Austin

Friends of the children - austin is a texas based nonprofit with the mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years,no matter…

Youth Development
8
Friends of the Children Tacoma

Friends of the children - tacoma is a washington based nonprofit with the mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no…

Youth Development
9
Friends of the Children - San Francisco Bay Area

Impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what.

Education
10
Friends of the Children - Phoenix

Friends of the children - phoenix has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with profesional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what. 83% of our youth receive…

Youth Development
11
Friends of the Children - Utah

Friends of the children utah has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Youth Development
12
Friends of the Children- Tampa Bay Inc

Friends of the children tampa bay has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships and professional mentors 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the Children - Chicago and the most unlike its peers is Trips for Kids Charlotte. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - DETROIT — $20,000 · Crime & LegalFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - DETROITEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $20,000 · Crime & LegalEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND…HAVEN INC — $10,000 · Crime & LegalHAVEN INCFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO — $15,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGOThe Cradle Foundation — $10,000 · Human ServicesThe Cradle FoundationIMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER — $10,000 · Human ServicesIMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTERTRIPS FOR KIDS CHARLOTTE — $10,000 · Human ServicesTRIPS FOR KIDS CHARLOTTEFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - TWIN CITIES — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF THE CHI…BRAVEN INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBRAVEN INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $10,000 · HealthREFUGEEONE — $10,000 · ReligionNAT ALLIANCE ON MENTAL HEALTH — $10,000 · Other
Crime & Legal$50,000Human Services$45,000Youth Development$25,000Health$10,000Religion$10,000Other$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - DETROIT — $20,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - TWIN CITIES — $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cradle Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBRAVEN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIPS FOR KIDS CHARLOTTE — $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetREFUGEEONE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAVEN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cynthia a Niekamp Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph