How much did CW SCHRENK & MARJORIE J SCHRENK grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 62% of CW SCHRENK & MARJORIE J SCHRENK’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

buckstripsstudentscampershipseducationsuppliesspecial

2019

riding loweducationsuppliesspecial

2020

riding loweducationsupplies children

2021

givingkidsattend summerbikechild

2022

babyrequirediapersridersattendbabiesfood

2023

babyrequirediapersbabiesattendfoodwell

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k22 grants · $87k
$10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$50k–250k1 grant · $100k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$5.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

YMCA OF BUCKS COUNTY$100,000
WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES$25,000
PARKWOOD THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$10,000
BRISTOL RIVERSIDE THEATRE$7,500
SPECIAL OLYMPICS PA$7,000
EMERGENCY RELIEF$5,833
SPECIAL EQUESTRIANS$5,000
THE BABY BUREAU$5,000
HOPE SPRINGS EQUESTRIANS$5,000
BUCKS COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH (CHARLIE KANE EMERGENCY FUND)$5,000
AMERICA'S GROW A ROW$5,000
MERCY CAREER & TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
NEIGHBORHOOD BIKE WORKS$5,000
LEG UP FARM$5,000
ANN SILVERMAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC$4,800

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 8%. 12% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.2M · 39 repeat orgs$215k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.2M

$207k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%

+24%

Still filing today

38%

28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

LU
LEG UP FARM
7× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +10%
SE
SPECIAL EQUESTRIANS
7× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +31%
BR
BRISTOL RIVERSIDE THEATRE
5× · 2018–2024 · $32k · revenue +49%

Funded once

PS
PENN STATE UNIVERSITY
one grant, 2019 · $29k
SR
ST ROSE OF LIMA CATHOLIC SCHOOL
one grant, 2021 · $25k
IM
INDEPENENCE MISSION SCHOOLS
one grant, 2020 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Hearts & Horses Inc

Equine assisted therapeutic services to individuals with disabilities and special needs.

Health

Dynamic Strides Therapy Inc

Dynamic Strides Therapy is a non-profit outpatient pediatric therapy facility that offers occupational, physical and speech therapies to children with special needs. Patients receive unique treatment that combines traditional occupational,…

Health

Tradewinds Services Inc

Provides services and support to individuals with special needs to help them realize their full potential.

Health

Riding to the Top

Riding to the top provides equine-assisted services to more than 250 children and adults with physical, cognitive and learning disabilities. while clients range in age from 3 to 60 plus years, more than 65% of rtt's clientele are children.

Human Services

Cape Abilities Inc

Training & job placement and resident services to disabled adults.

Human Services

The Children's Theraplay Foundation

To provide individualized skill development for children with disabilities and/or unique needsthrough physical, occupational and speech therapies using a horse as a treatment tool in a safe and caring environment.

Health

Joyride Center Inc

Joyride center provides therapeutic horsemanship activities and therapies to improve the physical and cognitive conditions of people with disabilities ages 3 to adult.

Animals

Brian's House Inc

Brian's house specializes in the care and treatment of people with disabilities.

Human Services

Special Equestrians Inc

Our Vision: A community where the impossible becomes possible. Our mission: To enrich the lives of people with physical, cognitive or emotional challenges through a relationship with a horse.

Human Services

Vocational Solutions

Developmental and rehabilitation services for disabled individuals

—

Arc Industries Inc of Franklin County

Training and employment services for developmentally disabled adults.

—

Quiet Oaks

Provide comfort and care to terminally ill persons and their families in a home-like setting

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Resources for Human Development Inc and the most unlike its peers is Williamson College of the Trades. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/26

the rest of the field

11%

2,808/24,560

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

23/23

Grantees still filing

18/23

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$941,855Education$256,043Health$81,480Human Services$48,042Animals$35,000Recreation & Sports$35,000Arts & Culture$31,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA22.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Foundations Community Partnership · Independence Foundation · Sanders Caroline J S Td No 2 · The Gordon Charter Foundation · The Cedarcrest Charitable Foundation Aka · Phillies Charities Inc · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Connelly Foundation · The Wawa Foundation Inc · Ethel S C Smith No 5 Charitable Tw · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CW SCHRENK & MARJORIE J SCHRENK funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE BABY BUREAU.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.4× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 455568559 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE BABY BUREAU, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Cw Schrenk & Marjorie J Schrenk?

Find your warmest path to Cw Schrenk & Marjorie J Schrenk through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CW SCHRENK & MARJORIE J SCHRENK

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Cw Schrenk & Marjorie J Schrenk?

More from the funding graph

CW SCHRENK & MARJORIE J SCHRENK

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Cw Schrenk & Marjorie J Schrenk?

More from the funding graph