Skip to content
Custom-Shoot-Out Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Custom-Shoot-Out Inc

The organization's primary mission is to raise funds for various foundations and 501(c)(3) charitable organizations.

$89k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$263kHealth$154kEducation$40kHuman Services$20kPhilanthropy$15kFood & Nutrition$10kEnvironment$6kCommunity Improvement$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $72,903, the rows itemized in this filing. The $88,704 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,801 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $62k
$30,803
Median grant
1
States reached
$96k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NIKLAUS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$31,044
THE INTERNATIONAL GAME FISH ASSOCIATION INC$30,803
GUY HARVEY FOUNDATION$5,888
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,168
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BIRDS EYE VIEW PROJECT: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$445k · 7 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$445k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
0%

Still filing today

86%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    INTERNATIONAL GAME FISH ASSOCIATION INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $135k · revenue +48%
  • TB
    THE BILLFISH FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $126k · revenue +5%
  • MC
    Miami Children's Health System Inc
    2× · 2023–2025 · $71k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • BB
    BEVP Birds Eye View Project
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • PS
    PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS CHARITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +61%
  • DF
    DERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH FLgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +102%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Coral Reef and Marine Science Foundation Inc C/O James Bildner
—
2
Gulf Fishery Research Foundation
Environment
3
Global Foundation for Oceanographic & Atmospheric Research Inc
Philanthropy
4
Schmidt Ocean Institute
Science & Tech
5
Oceanit Research Foundation
Science & Tech
6
Blue Nevus Melanoma Foundation

A foundation to support research for Blue Nevus Melanoma (BNM). BNM is an ultra rare condition and an aggressive form of Melanoma cancer. There is a dire need to develop new treatments and drugs for it as the standard of care for Melanoma…

Health
7
Florida Research Center for Agricultural Sustainability Inc
Philanthropy
8
Seaworld & Busch Gardens Conservation Fund
Environment
9
Promise Foundation Inc

Promote melanoma awareness and research

Philanthropy
10
Mote Marine Laboratory Inc

The advancement of marine and environmental sciences through scientific research, education and public outreach, leading new discoveries, revitalization and sustainability of our oceans and greater public understanding of our marine…

—
11
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
12
Florida Animal Protection Foundation
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Publix Super Markets Charities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL GAME FISH ASSOCIATION INC: $134,740 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL GAME FISH ASSOC…THE BILLFISH FOUNDATION INC: $126,245 · AnimalsTHE BILLFISH FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $200 · AnimalsMiami Children's Health System Inc: $71,044 · HealthMiami Children's Hea…RICHARD DAVID KANN MELANOMA TASK FORCE INC: $20,000 · HealthRICHARD DAVID KANN M…MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA: $20,000 · OtherMEDICAL COLLEGE…PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS CHARITIES INC: $10,000 · OtherPUBLIX SUPER MA…DERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH FL: $10,000 · OtherDERMATOLOGY FOU…MARSH HARBOUR SPRING CITY TOWNSHIP: $10,000 · OtherMARSH HARBOUR S…THE ROTARY CLUB OF ABACO: $2,500 · OtherGUY HARVEY OCEAN FUND INC: $5,888 · OtherGUY HARVEY OCEA…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BROWARD INC: $5,168 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUND…+4 more: $6,200 · Other+4 moreTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $53,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE BREAST …MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $20,000 · EducationBEVP Birds Eye View Project: $20,000 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$134,740Animals$126,445Health$91,044Other$69,756Public Safety & Disaster$53,000Education$20,000Human Services$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL GAME FISH ASSOCIATION INC: $134,740 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BILLFISH FOUNDATION INC: $126,245 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetMiami Children's Health System Inc: $71,044 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $53,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBEVP Birds Eye View Project: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH FL: $10,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BROWARD INC: $5,168 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE INDUSTRY CARES FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDACHSHUND RESCUE SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA9.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Custom-Shoot-Out Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Custom-Shoot-Out Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • International Game Fish Association Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Guy Harvey Ocean Fund Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Custom-Shoot-Out Inc?

Find your warmest path to Custom-Shoot-Out Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Custom-Shoot-Out’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home