Skip to content

· Private foundation

Custom Cares Charities

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$147kHuman Services$90kPhilanthropy$37kHealth$20kReligion$11kHousing & Shelter$8kYouth Development$6kRecreation & Sports$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$150k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ISSA CHARITIES$36,679
INDIVIDUALS-DETAILS UPON REQUEST$28,150
OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP$5,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
THE VINEYARD CHURCH OF AURORA$1,000
VINEYARD AURORA LITTLE FOOD PANTRY$1,000
JUVINILE JUSTICE INITIATIVE$750
MISERICORDIA HEART OF MERCY$500
Individual grant recipient$500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$500
Individual grant recipient$500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$500
ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$500
OPERATION SUPPORT OUR TROOPS$500
CRU INNER CITY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CROSS LINES COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $1k → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $40k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $25k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
CA
AZ
NM
KS
NC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$429k · 12 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against -17% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
19

Total granted

$429k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
-17%

Still filing today

17%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    7× · 2017–2023 · $147k
  • SR
    ST RITA OF CASCIA HIGH SCHOOL CORPORATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $71k
  • EN
    ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE
    2× · 2020–2025 · $66k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • AI
    ADOG INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • AS
    A SAFE HAVEN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +7%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
2
Augies Quest to Cure Als Inc

Founded by Augie Nieto, Augies Quest to Cure ALS is the unwavering force driving breakthroughs in ALS research, defying limitations, and empowering hope for a future without this devastating disease.

Health
3
Aids Foundation of Chicago

The aids foundation of chicago mobilizes communities to create equity and justice for people living with and vulnerable to hiv and related chronic disease.

Health
4
Arthritis National Research Foundation

To provide initial research funding to brilliant, investigative scientists with new ideas to cure arthritis and related autoimmune diseases.

Health
5
Accelerated Cure Project Inc

The organization's mission is to accelerate research efforts to improve diagnosis, to optimize treatment, and to cure multiple sclerosis.

Health
6
Cystic Fibrosis Research Institute

To fund cystic fibrosis research, provide educational and personal support, and to spread awareness of cystic fibrosis, a life-threatening genetic disease.

Health
7
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
8
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
9
Partnership for Cures

Cures Within Reach leverages the speed, safety and cost-effectiveness of testing approved therapies for new indications/diseases without effective treatment driving more treatments quicker to more patients.

Health
10
Als One Inc

The organization is a partnership of world leaders in als research and care focused on expediting breakthrough treatments and ultimately a cure for als while providing resources and equipment to those living with the disease now. the team…

Health
11
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
12
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc; the most unlike its peers is Radcliffe's Youth Sports Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
7/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $147,188 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST RITA OF CASCIA HIGH SCHOOL CORPORATION: $70,500 · OtherST RITA OF CASCIA HIGH SCHOOL CORPORATIONINDIVIDUALS-DETAILS UPON REQUEST: $57,300 · OtherINDIVIDUALS-DETAILS UPON REQUESTST RITA OF CASCIA HS: $57,000 · OtherST RITA OF CASCIA HSLOYOLA ACADEMY: $14,000 · Other+35 more: $53,760 · Other+35 moreERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $65,500 · Human ServicesERIE NEIGHBORH…+2 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesISSA Charities: $36,679 · PhilanthropyA SAFE HAVEN FOUNDATION: $7,500 · HealthIN SEARCH OF A CURE: $5,000 · HealthOLD IRVING PARK COMMUNITY CLINIC: $5,000 · HealthRORY DAVID DEUTSCH FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Health+5 more: $2,500 · HealthWALTER & CONNIE PAYTON FOUNDATION INC: $2,521 · Crime & LegalThe Juvenile Justice Initiative Attn Elizabeth Clarke: $750 · Crime & LegalRADCLIFFE'S YOUTH SPORTS ORGANIZATION: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsJESSE WHITE FOUNDATION LTD: $500 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $500 · Education
Other$399,748Human Services$67,000Philanthropy$36,679Health$23,500Crime & Legal$3,271Recreation & Sports$2,500Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $65,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetA SAFE HAVEN FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIN SEARCH OF A CURE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOLD IRVING PARK COMMUNITY CLINIC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRORY DAVID DEUTSCH FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWALTER & CONNIE PAYTON FOUNDATION INC: $2,521 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetRADCLIFFE'S YOUTH SPORTS ORGANIZATION: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCROSS-LINES COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALS UNITED GREATER CHICAGO: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGirl Scouts of Greater Chicago and Northwest Indiana: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ISSA Charities ↗
  • Who funds A SAFE HAVEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IN SEARCH OF A CURE ↗
  • Who funds OLD IRVING PARK COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds RORY DAVID DEUTSCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WALTER & CONNIE PAYTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RADCLIFFE'S YOUTH SPORTS ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds CROSS-LINES COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds The Juvenile Justice Initiative Attn Elizabeth Clarke ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds JESSE WHITE FOUNDATION LTD ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL16.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Imc Chicago Charitable Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Motorola Solutions Foundation · Greater Horizons · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Custom Cares Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Custom Cares Charities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Custom Cares Charities?

Find your warmest path to Custom Cares Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Custom Cares Charities’ filings →

More from the funding graph