Skip to content
Currie Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Currie Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$85kPublic Safety & Disaster$69kReligion$40kEnvironment$31kRecreation & Sports$14kHealth$14kCrime & Legal$13kHuman Services$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
6
States reached
$190k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
SORIN SOCIETY OF NOTRE DAME$1,700
TIMNATH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$1,500
ESTES PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT$1,500
FOOD BANK OF LARIMER COUNTY$1,000
HOPE COLLEGE$1,000
ESTES VALLEY RESTORATIVE JUSTICE$1,000
TOWN OF ESTES PARK$560
SALVATION ARMY$200
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$200
MEALS ON WHEELS$200
STEADMAN PHILIPPON RESEARCH INSTITU$100
PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CHURCH$100
Individual grant recipient$100
VAIL HEALTH FOUNDATION$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%SAMARITAS: $200 → 21%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%CROSSROADS MINISTRY OF ESTES PARK: $4k → 11%CROSSROADS MINISTRY OF ESTEST PARK: $1k → 11%CROSSROADS MINISTRY OF ESTES PARK: $500 → 11%FORT COLLINS RESCUE MISSION: $103 → 11%FORT COLLINS RESCUE MISSION: $100 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
PA
CA
CO
MO
KS
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$255k · 34 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
28

Total granted

$255k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+21%

Still filing today

41%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalAnimalsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HOPE COLLEGE
    7× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +37%
  • TF
    The Food Bank for Larimer County
    5× · 2019–2025 · $5k · revenue +57%
  • NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $800 · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • MF
    MARY FREE BED REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +18%
  • UF
    UNIVERSAL FOREST PRD FDN
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • ET
    EMPOWER THE EXTRAORDINARY CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
10
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Pet Association of Estes Park Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
22/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN RED CROSS: $35,500 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $28,650 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCHUNIVERSAL FOREST PROD FDN: $25,115 · OtherUNIVERSAL FOREST PROD FDNAMERICAN RED CROSS - CA FIRE: $16,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS - CA FIREGLEN HAVEN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMEN: $13,320 · OtherGLEN HAVEN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENSORIN SOCIETY OF NOTRE DAME: $9,400 · OtherSKY RANCH LUTHERAN CAMP: $6,709 · OtherESTES VALLEY RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PT: $6,500 · Other+42 more: $37,816 · Other+42 moreHOPE COLLEGE: $80,000 · EducationHOPE COLLEGEUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $3,250 · EducationCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Education+4 more: $2,400 · EducationMARY FREE BED REHABILITATION HOSPITAL: $10,000 · HealthSTEADMAN PHILIPPON RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $1,300 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $800 · Health+3 more: $600 · HealthCROSSROADS MINISTRY OF ESTES PARK: $5,700 · Human ServicesHUNT WITH HEART INCORPORATED: $1,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 · Human Services+2 more: $403 · Human ServicesThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $5,000 · Food & NutritionCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $2,080 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF LARIMER COUNTY: $500 · PhilanthropyPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF NORTHERN COLORADO: $1,500 · Religion
Other$179,010Education$88,650Health$12,700Human Services$7,353Food & Nutrition$5,000Philanthropy$3,580Religion$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $80,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARY FREE BED REHABILITATION HOSPITAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS MINISTRY OF ESTES PARK: $5,700 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $3,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $2,080 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF NORTHERN COLORADO: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEADMAN PHILIPPON RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LARIMER COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLARIMER COUNTY PARTNERS DBA PARTNERS MENTORING YOUTH: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL FRIENDS ALLIANCE: $225 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $203 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPET ASSOCIATION OF ESTES PARK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $70 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCounty Sheriffs of Colorado: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSUMER REPORTS INC: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MARY FREE BED REHABILITATION HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS MINISTRY OF ESTES PARK ↗
  • Who funds The Food Bank for Larimer County ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF NORTHERN COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds STEADMAN PHILIPPON RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LLOYD R SMITH VFW POST 10293 ↗
  • Who funds HUNT WITH HEART INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Colorado Gives Founda…Otter Cares Foundatio…Shell USA Company Fou…Charities Aid Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …
Community Foundation of Northern ColoradoCO21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · Colorado Gives Foundation · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · Shell USA Company Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Currie Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Currie Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Currie Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home