How much did Cupertino Rotary Endowment Foundation grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of Cupertino Rotary Endowment Foundation’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

shinlow incomeeducation

2020

—

2021

district

2022

district

2023

childrendistrict

2024

backeducationscholarshipsdistrict

2025

childrenscholarshipsinternationaldistrict

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k6 grants · $49k
$10k–50k7 grants · $123k
$50k–250k1 grant · $59k

$12,801

Median grant

States reached

$3.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

Rotary D5170 Foundation$59,445
Foothill-DeAnza Foundation$28,124
SJSU$20,000
Community Cycles$20,000
Rotary D5000 Foundation$17,900
The Rotary Foundation$13,550
West Valley Community Serv$12,801
CAF America$10,500
Pacific Clinics$9,500
Rebuilding Together$9,326
Life Services Alternative$8,284
Shakespeare-San Francisco$8,000
FUHSD$6,912
Rotary International D5170$6,650

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$862k · 9 repeat orgs$245k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$862k

$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%

+60%

Still filing today

78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalEducationHousing & ShelterHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RI
Rotary International D5170
7× · 2018–2024 · $281k · revenue +62%
The Rotary Foundation
4× · 2018–2024 · $60k · revenue +1%
WV
West Valley Community Service
7× · 2018–2024 · $58k · revenue +64%

Funded once

AI
Assist Internationalgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $38k · revenue +35%
MS
Marine Science Institutegraduated
one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +92%
VM
Valley Medical Center Foundat
one grant, 2020 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights

Rotary Club of Sacramento Foundation

Our mission is to provide leadership,perpetual funding and resources necessary to support the diverse humanitarian efforts of the rotary club of sacramento in local and world communities.

Community Improvement

Rotary Club of Monterey

Encourage and foster professional standards of services.

—

Himalayan Childrens Fund

HCF provides crucial financial support for education, food, clothing and medical care for the impoverished people of the Himalayan region who are primarily of Tibetan and Buddhist heritage.

International

League of California

The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…

Philanthropy

Unitarian Universalist Justice Ministry of California

Is a statewide justice ministry that cultivates and connects leaders and communities to empower the public voice of those who share uu values and principals

—

Space Coast Center for Independent

Provide services and programs promoting independence for all people with disabilities.

Civil Rights

Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

the organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the UCSF Foundation.

Education

Children's Council of San Francisco

Since 1974, Children's Council has been at the heart of early care and education in San Francisco.

Human Services

The American Institute of Architects

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—

A-Z Foundation Group

To help fund California's local communities that will benefit youth, disabled and elderly veterans, special needs, educational, conservation and other local activities. To provide support to programs that focus on veterans, disabled youth…

—

Sacramento Area Bicycle Advocates

To improve the quality of life in the Sacramento region by enabling people in all communities to make more and safer trips by bicycle.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Valley Community Services and the most unlike its peers is Girl Scouts of the United States of. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/19

Grantees still filing

13/19

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$666,000Philanthropy$159,264International$98,489Human Services$62,784Housing & Shelter$57,571Education$40,226Health$22,684

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA20.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Bright Funds Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Rotary Club of San Jose Foundation · Star One Credit Union · Los Altos Mountain View · Agilent Technologies Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Cupertino Rotary Endowment Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Rotary International D5170.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~7 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +62% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 942616299 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Rotary International D5170, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 7 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 13% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Cupertino Rotary Endowment Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Cupertino Rotary Endowment Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Cupertino Rotary Endowment Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Cupertino Rotary Endowment Foundation?

More from the funding graph

Cupertino Rotary Endowment Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Cupertino Rotary Endowment Foundation?

More from the funding graph